ArlinM. (1982). Teacher responses to students time differences in mastery learning. American Journal of Education, 90, 334–352.
2.
BenbowC.P. (in press). Meeting the needs of gifted students through use of acceleration. WangM.C.ReynoldsM.WalbergH. (Eds.), Handbook of Special Education: Research and Practice, Vol. 4. Pergamon.
3.
BenbowC.P.ArjmandO. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 430–431.
4.
5.
BenbowC.P.StanleyJ.C. Eds. (1983). Academic Precocity: Aspects of its development.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
BrodyL.E.BenbowC.P. (1987). Accelerative strategies: How effective are they for the gifted?Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 105–10.
7.
CarrollJ.B. (1989). The Carroll model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18, 26–31.
8.
ColangeloN.DavisG.A. Eds. (1991). Handbook of gifted education.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
ColemanJ.S. (1960). The adolescent subculture and academic achievement. American Journal of Sociology, 65, 337–347.
10.
ElkindD. (1988). Acceleration. Young Children, 43(4), 2.
11.
FeldhusenJ.F. (1989). Synthesis of research on gifted youth. Educational Leadership, 46, 6–11.
12.
GallagherJ.J.CourtrightR.D. (1986). The educational definition of giftedness and its policy implications. In SternbergR.J.DavidsonJ.E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 93–111). Cambridge University Press.
13.
HofstadterR. (1963). Anti-intellectualism in American life.New York: Knopf.
14.
HorowitzF.D.O'BrienM. (1986). Gifted and talented children: State of knowledge and directions for research. American Psychologist, 41, 1147–1152.
15.
KulikC.C.KulikJ.A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415–428.
16.
KulikJ.A.KulikC.C. (1984). Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54, 409–425.
17.
LandersS. (1989). More than a ‘quick fix’ needed for youngsters. The APA Monitor, 20(7), 35.
18.
RenzulliJ.S.ReisS.M. (1986). The enrichment triad/revolving door model: A schoolwide plan for the development of creative productivity. In RenzulliJ.S. (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 216–266). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
19.
RichertE.S.AlvinoJ.McDonnelR. (1982). The national report on identification: Assessment and recommendations for comprehensive identification of gifted and talented youth.Sewell, NJ: Educational Information and Resource Center, U.S. Department of Education.
20.
RobinsonA. (1990). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 9–27.
21.
RogersK. (1990, November). Effects of homogeneous grouping and acceleration on gifted students. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association for Gifted Children. Little Rock, AR.
22.
SchunkD.H.HansonA.R.CoxP.D. (1987). Strategy self-verbalizations during remedial listening comprehension instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 54–61.
23.
SirotnikK.A. (1983). What you see is what you get — Consistency, persistency, and mediocrity in classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 16–31.
24.
SjostrandW. (1967). School achievement and development of personality: Some results of Swedish homogenizing experiment. Pedagogica Europaea, 189–212.
25.
SlavinR.E. (1990). Ability grouping, cooperative learning, and the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 3–8.
26.
SouthernW.T.JonesE.D.FiscusE.D. (1989). Practitioner objections to the academic acceleration of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 29–35.
27.
StarkoA. (1990). Life and death of a gifted program: Lessons not yet learned. Roeper Review, 13, 33–38.
28.
SwiatekM.A.BenbowC.P. (1990, November). A ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association of Gifted Children. Little Rock, AR.
29.
SwiatekM.A.BenbowC.P. (1991). A ten-year longitudinal follow-up of participants in a fast-paced mathematics course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
30.
TannenbaumA.J. (1962). Adolescents' attitudes toward academic brilliance.New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers's College, Columbia University.
31.
TannenbaumA.J. (1991). The social psychology of giftedness. In ColangeloN.DavisG.A. (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 27–44). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.