BernS.L. (1974). The measure of psychological androgynyJournal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
2.
BernS. L. (1987a). Gender Schema Theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender-aschematic children in a gender schematic society In WalshM.R. (Ed.), The Psychology of Women (pp.226–245). New Haven: Yale University Press.
3.
BernS.L. (1987b). Probing the promise of androgyny In WalshM.R. (Ed.) The Psychology of Women (pp. 206–225). New Haven: Yale University Press.
4.
CardJ.J.SteeleL.AbelesR.P. (1980). Sex differences in realization of individual potential for achievementJournal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 1–20.
5.
CastenellL.A. (1983). Achievement motivations: An investigation of adolescent achievement patternAmerican Educational Research Journal, 20, 503–510.
6.
ClarkB. (1988) Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
7.
FriezeI.H.ParsonsJ.E.JohnsonP.B.RubleD.N.ZellmanG.L. (1978) Women and sex roles: A social psychological perspective. New York: W.W. Norton.
8.
GilliganC.LyonsN.P.HammerT.J. (Eds.) (1990). Making connections: The relational world of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
9.
GrauP.N. (1985). Counseling and the gifted girlThe Gifted Child Today, 38, 8–11.
10.
GreendorferS. (1983). Shaping the female athelete: The impact of the family In BoutlierM.A.SanGiovanniL. (Eds.), The Sporting Woman (pp. 135–156). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
11.
GrothN. (1975). Success and creativity in male and female professorsGifted Child Quarterly, 19, (328–325).
12.
HighamS.NavarreJ. (1984). Gifted adolescent females require differential treatmentJournal for the Education of the Gifted, 8, 43–58.
13.
Howard-HamiltonM.F. (1990). [The effects of a deliberate psychological intervention on the motive to achieve in gifted adolescents.] Unpublished raw data.
14.
HornerM.S. (1968). Sex differences in achievement motivation and performance in competitive situations. Dissertation AbstractsInternational, 30, 407B. (University Microfilms No. 69–12, 135).
15.
HornerM.S. (1987). Toward an understanding of achievement related conflicts in women In WalshM.R. (Ed.), The Psychology of Women (pp. 169–184). New Haven: Yale University.
16.
KaufmannF. (1981). The 1964–1968 presidential scholars: A follow-up studyExceptional Children, 48, 164–169.
NielsenJ.M. (1990). Sex and gender in society: Perspectives on stratification (2nd ed.). Prospects Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
19.
NobleK.D. (1987). The dilemma of the gifted womanPsychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 367–378.
20.
SadkerM.P.SadkerD.M. (1982). Sex equity handbook for schools. New York: Longman, Inc.
21.
SpenceJ.T.HelmreichR.StappJ. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininityJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.
22.
SprinthallN.A.ScottJ.R. (1989). Promoting psychological development, math achievement and success attribution of female students through deliberate psychological educationJournal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 440–446.
23.
TermanL.OdenM. (1959). The gifted group at mid-life; thirty five year's follow-up of the superior child In TermanL. (Ed.), Genetic Studies of Genius (Vol. 5). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
WolleatP.L. (1979). Guiding the career development of gifted females In ColangeloN.ZaffranR. T. (Eds.), New Voices in Counseling the Gifted (pp. 331–345). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.