Achey-CuttsP.GarvinK. (1983). Identifying the gifted: A step-by-step procedure. G/C/T, 27, 16–17.
2.
AsherJ.W. (1976). Educational research and evaluation methods.Boston: Little Brown.
3.
BogdanR.C.BiklenS.K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4.
BorlandJ. (1986). IQ tests: Throwing out the bathwater, saving the baby. Roeper Review, 8(3), 163–167.
5.
FeldhusenJ.F.AsherJ.W.HooverS.M. (1984). Problems in the identification of giftedness, talent or ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(4), 149–151.
6.
FeldhusenJ.F.BaskaL. (1985). Identification & assessment of the gifted and talented. In FeldhusenJ. F (Ed.). Toward excellence in gifted education (pp. 69–83). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.
7.
FeldhusenJ.F.HooverS.M.SaylerM.F. (1990). Identification of gifted students at the secondary level.Monroe, NY: Trillium Press.
8.
FeldhusenJ.F.KolloffM.B. (1979). A three stage model for gifted education. G/C/T, 1, 3–5, 55–57.
9.
FeldhusenJ.F.KolloffM.B. (1986). The Purdue three-stage enrichment model for gifted education at the elementary level. In RenzulliJ. S (Ed.). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 126–153). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
10.
HooverS.M.FeldhusenJ.F. (1987). Integrating identification, school services, and student needs in secondary gifted programs. Arkansas Gifted Educator's Magazine, 1, 8–16.
11.
KolloffM.B.FeldhusenJ.F. (1981). PACE (Program for Academic and Creative Enrichment): An application of the three-stage model. G/C/T, 18, 47–50.
12.
MoonS.M.SwiftM.S. (1989, July/August). Leadership in program development: A process model. The Gifted Child Today, 12(4), 16–21.
13.
MooreA.D.BettsG.T. (1987). Using judgment analysis in the identification of gifted and talented children. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(1), 30–33.
14.
RenzulliJ.S.HartmanR.K.CallahanC.M. (1975). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. In BarbeW.B.RenzulliJ. S (Eds.). Psychology and education of the gifted (pp. 264–273). New York: John Wiley.
15.
RenzulliJ.S.ReisS.M. (1986). The Enrichment Triad/Revolving Door Model: A school-wide plan for development of creative talent. In RenzulliJ. S (Ed.). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 216–266). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
16.
RenzulliJ.S.SmithL.H. (1977). Two approaches to identification of gifted students. Exceptional Children, 43, 512–518.
17.
RichertS.E.AlvinoJ.J.McDonnelR.C. (1982). National report on identification: Assessment and recommendations for comprehensive identification of gifted and talented youth.Sewell, NJ: Educational Resources Information Center.
18.
RobinsonN.M.ChammondD.L. (1986). Appropriate uses of intelligence tests with gifted children. Roeper Review, 8(3), 160–163.
19.
SternbergR.J. (1982). Lies we live by: Misapplication of tests in identifying the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(4), 157–160.
20.
TannenbaumA.J. (1986). The enrichment matrix model. In RenzulliJ. S (Ed.). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 391–429). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
21.
TreffingerD.J. (1986). Fostering effective, independent learning through individualized programming. In RenzulliJ. S (Ed.). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 429–461). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
22.
TuttleF.B.BeckerL.A. (1983). Characteristics and identification of gifted and talented students.2nd ed.Washington, DC: National Education Association.
23.
YarboroughB.H.JohnsonR.A. (1983). Identifying the gifted: A theory-practice gap. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27(3), 135–138.