BaldwinA.Y. (1977). Tests do underpredict: A case study. Phi Delta Kappan, 59(8), 620–621.
3.
BaldwinA.Y. (1987). I'm black but look at me, I am also gifted. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(4), 180–185.
4.
BernalE.M. (1981). Special problems and procedures for identifying minority gifted students.Texas: Creative Educational Enterprises. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 203 652).
5.
CooperG.C. (1980). Everyone does not think alike. English Journal, 69(4), 45–50.
6.
CreminsM.A. (1987). A rationale for reexamining definitions, identification, and programs for the gifted-disabled/disadvantaged.Arlington, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 289 284).
7.
DavisG.A.RimmS. (1989). Education of the gifted and talented (2nd edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
8.
DuboisP.H. (1970). A history of psychological testing.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
FarrahG.A.MilchusN.J.ReitzW. (1967). Self Concept and Motivation Inventory. Dearborn Heights, MI: Person-O-Metrics, Inc.
10.
GallagherJ.J.CourtrightR.D. (1986). The educational definition of giftedness and its policy implication. In SternbergR.J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.). Conceptions of giftedness.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind.New York: Basic Books.
12.
GardnerH. (1984). Assessing intelligences: A comment on testing intelligences without I.Q. tests. Phi Delta Kappon, 65(10), 699–700.
13.
GrantT.E.RenzulliJ.S. (1976). Relevant Aspects of Potential. RAP Researchers.
14.
HartyH.AdkinsD.M.SherwoodR.D. (1984). Predictability of giftedness identification indices for two recognized approaches to elementary school gifted education. Journal of Educational Research, 77(6), 337–342.
15.
HatchT.C.GardnerH. (1986). From testing intelligence to assessing competencies: A pluralistic view of intelligence. Roeper Review, 8(3), 147–150.
16.
JohnsonS.T.StarnesW.T.GregoryD.BlaylockA. (1985). Program of assessment, diagnosis, and instruction PADI: Identifying and nurturing potentially gifted and talented minority students. Journal of Negro Education, 24, 416–430.
KranzB. (1978). Multidimensional Screening Device (MSD) for the Identification of Gifted and Talented children. Grand Forks: University of North Dakota Bureau of Educational Research.
19.
McDanielT.R. (1989). Mainstreaming the gifted: Historical perspectives on excellence and equity. Roeper Review, 11(3), 171–173.
20.
McKenzieJ. (1986). The influence of identification practices, race and SES on the identification of gifted students. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 93–95.
21.
MeekerM.MeekerR. (1985). SOI-Learning Abilities Test: Screening Form for Atypical Gifted. Vida, OR: M & M Systems.
22.
MercerJ.R.LewisJ. (1977). System of Multicultural Pluralistic Assessment (SOMPA). New York: The Psychological Corporation.
23.
PassowA.H. (1972). The gifted and the disadvantaged. The National Elementary Principal, 51(5), 24–41.
24.
PassowA.H. (1984). Education of the gifted in world perspective.New York: Teachers College Columbia University. (ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED 292 239).
25.
PassowA.H. (1986). Educational programs for minority/disadvantaged gifted students.New York: Teachers College Columbia University. (ERIC Reproduction Series No. ED 268 190).
26.
Public Law 95–561 (1978). Educational Amendments of 1978. 92 Stat. 2143, 95th Congress. 2nd session.
27.
RenzulliJ.S. (1973). Talent potential in minority group students. Exceptional Children, 39, 437–444.
28.
RenzulliJ.S. (1978). What makes giftedness: Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 108–184.
29.
RenzulliJ.S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In SternbergR.J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.). Conceptions of giftedness.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
RenzulliJ.S.StoddardE.P. (1980). Gifted and talented education in perspective.Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
31.
RichertE.S. (1987). Rampant problems and promising practices in the identification of disadvantaged gifted children. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(4), 149–154.
32.
SternbergR.J. (1984a). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269–315.
33.
SternbergR.J. (1984b). What should intelligence tests test? Implications for a triarchic theory of intelligence for intelligence testing. Educational Researcher, 13(1), 5–15.
34.
SternbergR.J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
SternbergR.J.DavidsonJ.E. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
TannenbaumA.J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In SternbergR.J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.) Conceptions of giftedness.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
TermanL. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. In TermanL. (Ed.). Genetic studies of genius (Vol 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38.
TorranceE.P. (1977a). Discovery and nurturance of giftedness in the culturally different.Virginia: Council on Exceptional Children.
TorranceE.P. (1978). Ways of discovering gifted black children. In BaldwinA.Y.GearG. H.LucitoL. J. (Eds.). Educational planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
41.
U.S. Commissioner of Education (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42.
WeinbergR.A. (1989). Intelligence and IQ: Landmark issues and great debate. American Psychologist, 44(2), 98–104.
43.
YanceyE. (1983). Increasing participation of minority and culturally diverse students in gifted programs.Washington, D.C.: The American University Mid-Atlantic Center for Race Equity. (ERIC Document Reproduction Series No. ED 244 010).
