FeldhusenJ.F. (1989). Synthesis of research on gifted youth. Educational Leadership, 46, 6–11.
2.
FeldhusenJ.F.KolloffM.B. (Reprinted from 1978 issue with 1988 update). A three-stage model for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 11, 14–20.
3.
FeatherstoneH. (ed.) 1987. Organizing classes by ability. The Harvard Education Letter, 3, 1–4.
4.
KulikJ.A.KulikC.L. (1987). Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity & Excellence, 22, 22–30.
5.
MarlandS.P. (1971). Education of the Gifted and Talented.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6.
ParkerJ. (Reprinted from 1979 issue with 1988 update). Differentiated programs for the g/c/t … luxury or necessity?Gifted Child Today, 11, 31–33.
7.
ShunkD.H. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 52, 149–174.
8.
SlavinR.E. (1987). Grouping for instruction: Equity and effectiveness. Equity & Excellence, 23, 31–36.
9.
TrimbleK.D.SinclairR. L. (1987). On the wrong track: Ability grouping and the threat to equity. Equity & Excellence, 23, 15–21.
10.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.CampbellM. (1988). Developing scope and sequence in curriculum for the gifted learner: A comprehensive approach. Gifted Child Today, 11, 2–7.