BenbowC.P. (1979). The components of SMPY'S smorgasboard of accelerative options. Intellectually Talented Youth Bulletin, 5(10), 21–23.
2.
BrodyL.E.BenbowC.P. (1987). Accelerative strategies: How effective are they for the gifted?Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 105–110.
3.
BrodyL.E.LupkowskiA.E.StanleyJ.C. (1988). Early entrance to college: A study of academic and social adjustment during the freshman year. College and University, 63, 347–359.
4.
DauberS.L. (1988). International Mathematical Olympiad. The Gifted Child Today, 11(5), 8–11.
5.
LenchnerG. (1983). Creative problem solving in school mathematics.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
6.
LupkowskiA.E.AssoulineS.G. (in preparation). Jane and Johnny Love Math..
7.
LupkowskiA.E.AssoulineS.G.StanleyJ.C. (submitted). Beyond testing: Applying a mentor model for young mathematically talented students..
8.
SaulM.E.KesslerG.W.KrilovS.ZimmermanL. (1986). The New York City contest problem book.Palo Alto: Dale Seymour Publications.
9.
StanleyJ.C. (1978). SMPY's DT-PI mentor model: Diagnostic testing followed by prescriptive instruction. Intellectually Talented Youth Bulletin, 4(10), 7–8.
10.
StanleyJ.C. (1979). How to use a fast-pacing math mentor. Intellectually Talented Youth Bulletin, 5(6), 1–2.
11.
StanleyJ.C. (1986). Fostering use of mathematical talent in the USA: SMPY's rationale. In CropleyA.J.UrbanK. K.WagnerH.WieczerkowskiW. (Eds.). Giftedness: A continuing worldwide challenge (pp. 227–243). New York: Trillium Press. (Also appeared in the Journal of the Illinois Council for the Gifted, 1986, 5, 18–24.).