This article describes a Javits project that focused on expanding talent development opportunities for students from underserved populations. Findings from a case study of one school implementing the multi-tier talent development model are described. The study explored the experiences of students, teachers, and mentors through qualitative interviews. Analysis of the interview data revealed four themes: (a) increasing access for underserved students; (b) impact on students’ interest in STEM; (c) fostering students’ motivation, engagement, and self-efficacy; and (d) developing cognitive and executive functioning skills. The findings highlight the potential of targeted, research-based interventions to broaden participation and support the talent development of students from underrepresented populations in STEM fields.
BennerG. J.KutashK.NelsonJ. R.FisherM. B. (2013). Closing the achievement gap of youth with emotional and behavioral disorders through multi-tiered systems of support. Education & Treatment of Children, 36(3), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2013.0018
3.
BiancoM. (2010). Strength-based RTI: Conceptualizing a multi-tiered system for developing gifted potential. Theory into Practice, 49(4), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2010.510763
4.
DaunichtT.-M.EmmerdingerK. J.StoegerH.ZieglerA. (2025). Analyzing barriers to mentee activity in a school-based talent mentoring program: A mixed-method study. Education Sciences, 15(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020162
5.
DixsonD. D.WorrellF. C.Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F. (2016). Beyond perceived ability: The contribution of psychosocial factors to academic performance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13210
KimM. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216630607
11.
LockhartK.MeyerM. S.CrutchfieldK. (2022). A content analysis of selected state plans for gifted and talented education. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211026240
12.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. Jossey-Bass.
13.
MunR. U.EzzaniM. D.LeeL. E.OttweinJ. K. (2021). Building systemic capacity to improve identification and services in gifted education: A case study of one district. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(2), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220967376
Olszewski‐KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.DavisL. C.WorrellF. C.ZieglerA.SubotnikR.StoegerH.Olszewski-KubiliusP.AssoulineS. (2019). Benchmarking psychosocial skills important for talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20318
16.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C.AssoulineS. G.StoegerH.ZieglerA. (2024). Extending research on psychosocial skills and appropriate instruction in developing talents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 47(4), 335–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532241281566
17.
PereiraN.BrightS.OzenZ.SafitriS.Castillo-HermosillaH.MatosB. C.KaratasT.FonsecaP. (2025). A multitiered approach to computer science talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 69(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862241307662
18.
PereiraN.BrightS.SafitriS.ZhangY.Castillo-HermosillaH.MatosB. C.OzenZ. (2025). A multi-tier approach to STEM talent development: Using enrichment and social-emotional learning to inspire careers in STEM. [Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting.
19.
PetersS. J. (2022). The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
20.
PetersS. J.GentryM.WhitingG. W.McBeeM. T. (2019). Who gets served in gifted education? Demographic representation and a call for action. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219833738
21.
PreckelF.GolleJ.GrabnerR.JarvinL.KozbeltA.MüllensiefenD.Olszewski-KubiliusP.SchneiderW.SubotnikR.VockM.WorrellF. C. (2020). Talent development in achievement domains: A psychological framework for within- and cross-domain research. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 15(3), 691–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895030
22.
RavitchS. M.CarlN. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. Sage.
23.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Creative Learning Press.
24.
ResnickM.MaloneyJ.Monroy-HernándezA.RuskN.EastmodE.BrennanK.MillnerA.RosenbaumE.SilverJ.SilvermanB.KafaiY. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
25.
RinnA. N. (2012). Implications for addressing the psychosocial needs of gifted individuals: A response to Subotnik, Olszewski-Kubilius, & Worrell (2011). Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 206–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212456076
26.
RinnA. N. (2024). Conducting research on psychosocial skills associated with academic talent development. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 47(4), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532241278991
27.
RobertsonS.PfeifferS. (2016). Development of a procedural guide to implement response to intervention (RtI) with high-ability learners. Roeper Review, 38(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1112863
28.
SailorW.SkrticT. M.CohnM.OlmsteadC. (2021). Preparing teacher educators for statewide scale-up of multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS). Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 44(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420938035
29.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
30.
SmithS. A. (2025). Systemic integration of gifted and MTSS: A state-level approach. Gifted Child Today, 48(3), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621751330330
31.
StoegerH.HoppM.ZieglerA. (2017). Online mentoring as an extracurricular measure to encourage talented girls in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics): An empirical study of one-on-one versus group mentoring. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217702215
32.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.CorwithS.CalvertE.WorrellF. C. (2023). Transforming gifted education in schools: Practical applications of a comprehensive framework for developing academic talent. Education Sciences, 13(7), 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070707
33.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
34.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2021). The talent development megamodel: A domain-specific conceptual framework based on the psychology of high performance. In SternbergR. J.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 425–442). Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_24
YinR. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.
39.
ZhangJ.MartellaR. C.KangS.YeniogluB. Y. (2023). Response to intervention (RTI)/Multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS): A nationwide analysis. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 7(2), 1–26. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1396417.pdf.
