In our experiences as Black caregivers, we are very thoughtful and concerned about the STEM experiences of young Gifted and Talented (GATE) Black and other Students of Color in P-12 and higher education. In both academic settings, Black and Hispanic students are inequitably underrepresented in GATE, college, and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) (Hines et al., 2024a). Why does underrepresentation in such advanced programs exist? There is a myriad of factors, explained herein. In addition to presenting data, we share several barriers, recommendations, and resources. Also important, we highlight a sample of Black boys and girls who are trailblazers in STEM with the goal of explaining how educators can and must foster STEM engagement among all students, GATE Black and minoritized students.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon.
2.
BanksJ. A. (2018). An introduction to multicultural education (6th ed.). Pearson.
3.
CollinsK. H.JosephN. M.FordD. Y. (2020). Missing in action: Gifted Black girls in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Gifted Child Today, 43(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519880593
4.
CrenshawK. (2005). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color (1994). In BergenR. K.EdlesonJ. L.RenzettiC. M. (Eds.), Violence against women: Classic papers (pp. 282–313). Pearson Education.
5.
Easton-BrooksD. (2019). Ethnic matching: Academic success of students of color. Roman & Littlefield.
6.
FordD. Y. (2010). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed.). Prufrock Press.
7.
FordD. Y. (2011). Multicultural gifted education: Rationale, models, strategies, and resources (2nd ed.). Prufrock Press.
8.
FordD. Y. (2013). Recruiting and retaining culturally different students in gifted education. Prufrock Press.
9.
GranthamT. C.FordD. Y.HenfieldM.Trotman ScottM.HarmonD.PorchérS.PriceC. (2011). Gifted and advanced Black students in school: An anthology of critical works. Prufrock Press.
10.
GrissomJ. A.ReddingC. (2016). Discretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERA Open, 2(1), 233285841562217–233285841562225. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415622175
HendersonJ. A.HinesE. M.BoyceA. S.GoldenM. N.Singleton IIP.DavisJ. L.SlackT.JunqueiraW. (2022). Factors impacting advanced degree attainment in engineering for Black males. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 28(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2021036005
13.
HinesE. M.FletcherE. C.Jr.MooreJ. L.III. (2024b). Introduction to the special issue: Black males in STEM (Part 2). Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 30(1), ix–xi. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v30.i1.20
14.
HinesE. M.FletcherE. C.Jr.MooreJ. L.III. (2023). Introduction to the special issue: Black males in STEM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 29(5), ix–xi. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v29.i5.10
15.
HinesE. M.FletcherE. C.HarrisP. C.HendersonJ. A.Jr.MooreJ. L.III. (2024a). Using homeplace to guide STEM identity development in Black males. Theory Into Practice, 63(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2023.2287740
WrightB. L.FordD. Y.ScottM. T. (2017). Multicultural: Multicultural pathways to STEM: Engaging young gifted Black boys using the color-coded bloom-banks Matrix. Gifted Child Today, 40(4), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517722577
21.
YoungJ. L.YoungJ.FordD. Y. (2019). Culturally relevant STEM out-of-school time: A rationale to support gifted girls of color. Roeper Review, 41(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1553215
