The Center for Gifted Education (Center) at William & Mary has provided diverse enrichment programs for high-ability students since 1988. With an aspiration to serve financially disadvantaged students, the Center developed and hosted a summer residential enrichment program in STEM areas. Camp Launch, for low-income, high-ability middle school students started in 2012. The program expanded to serve up to 10th-grade students. Follow-up surveys and interviews of alumni provide evidence of the program’s impact on their academic and career planning.
BurneyV. H.BeilkeJ. R. (2008). The constraints of poverty on high achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(3), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2008-771
2.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
3.
CrossT. L.ColemanL. J. (2005). School-based conception of giftedness. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 52–63). Cambridge University Press.
HairN. L.HansonJ. L.WolfeB. L.PollakS. D. (2015). Association of child poverty, brain development, and academic achievement. JAMA Pediatrics, 169(9), 822–829. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1475
6.
KimM.CrossJ. R.CrossT. L. (2017). Program development for disadvantaged high-ability students. Gifted Child Today, 40(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517690190
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children with America’s schools. Crown.
9.
LeeS.Olszewski-KubiliusP.PeternelG. (2009). Follow-Up with students after 6 years of participation in project EXCITE. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208330562
10.
MartinI.KarabelJ.JaquezS. W. (2005). High school segregation and access to the University of California. Educational Policy, 19(2), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904804274058
11.
MofieldE. L.MofieldW. E. (2022). Applying a Christian perspective to educating gifted students through the talent development framework. International Journal of Christianity & Education, 26(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/20569971211062565
Olszewski-KubiliusP.ThomsonD. (2015). Talent development as a framework for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 38(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514556531
14.
PetersS. (2022). The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
SiegleD. (2018). Understanding underachievement. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (2nd ed., pp. 285–297). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_16
17.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski‐KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
18.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski‐KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2019). Environmental factors and personal characteristics interact to yield high performance in domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 2804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02804
19.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2022). The curriculum planning and instruction standard in gifted education: From idea to reality. In JohnsenS. K.DaileyD.CotabishA. (Eds.), NAGC Pre-K–Grade 12 gifted education programming standards (2nd., pp. 128–151). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003236863-5
ZieglerA. (2005). The actiotope model of giftedness. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 411–436). Cambridge University Press.
