Identification Policy: Addressing Equity and Excellence for Advanced Learners

Abstract

Identification for gifted and talented services is governed by state and local policies. Inclusive, student-centered policies can support equity and excellence by ensuring that all students have access to appropriate levels of academic challenge. Gifted programming standards, evidence-based interventions, and emerging strategies can provide guidance for the creation of strong identification policies and for the revision of policies that do not adequately support equitable access, program alignment, and the proportional representation of students from culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse backgrounds. Some critical points to consider when creating identification policies for advanced learning programs include providing opportunities to learn, expanding access to advanced programming, embedding retention supports, ensuring flexibility to account for local needs, maintaining an emphasis on excellence, and inviting input from families and community members.

Keywords

identification policy gifted and talented education universal screening local norms

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Advanced Coursework Equity Act, H.R.2765, 117th Cong (2021). https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2765

Advanced Coursework Equity Act, S.1305, 117th Cong (2021). https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1305/text

Aurora Public Schools (2021). Demographics. https://aurorak12.org/about-aps/fast-facts/demographics/

Bernstein

B. O.

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2019). Psychological constellations assessed at age 13 predict distinct forms of eminence 35 years later. Psychological Science, 30(3), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618822524

Bishop

Tan

Barkatsas

T. N.

(2015). Diversity in mathematics education: Towards inclusive practices. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-05978-5

Callahan

C. M.

Azano

Park

Broderson

A. V.

Caughey

Dmitrieva

(2022). Consequences of implementing curricular-aligned strategies for identifying rural gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221082064

Carman

C. A.

Walther

C. A. P.

Bartsch

R. A.

(2018). Using the Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT) 7 nonverbal battery to identify the gifted/talented: An investigation of demographic effects and norming plans. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752097

Carman

C. A.

Walther

C. A. P.

Bartsch

R. A.

(2020). Differences in using the cognitive abilities test (CogAT) 7 nonverbal battery versus the Naglieri nonverbal ability test (NNAT) 2 to identify the gifted/talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(3), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220921164

College Board (2012). Equity and access in AP. https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/excelerator/AP-Equity-and-Access_IB_June-2012_FINAL.pdf

10.

Colorado Department of Education (2020). Advanced learning plans. https://www.cde.state.co.us/gt/alpguidance

11.

Dallas Independent School District (2022, February). Honors classes available to all 6th-12th grade students in 2022-2023. Dallas ISD News Hub.

12.

Dixson

D. D.

Peters

S. J.

Makel

M. C.

Jolly

J. L.

Matthews

M. S.

Miller

E. M.

Rambo-Hernandez

K. E.

Rinn

A. N.

Robins

J. H.

Wilson

H. E.

(2020). A call to reframe gifted education as maximizing learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(4), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720978057

13.

Exceptional Children’s Education Act Title 22 §22-20-101 (2018). https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/images/olls/crs2018-title-22.pdf

14.

Gay

(2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.

15.

Gentry

Gray

Whiting

G. W.

Maeda

Pereira

(2019). Gifted education in the United States: Laws, access, equity, and missingness across the country by locale, Title I school status, and race. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0lxzznnyh5u0jj1/Access%20Denied.pdf

16.

Gifted and Talented Children, Title 16 V.S.A. § 13 (2012). https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/16/001/00013

17.

Identification Procedures, Title 92, Nebraska Administrative Code . (1998). https://casetext.com/regulation/nebraska-administrative-code/education-department-of/title-92-nebraska-department-of-education/chapter-3-regulations-governing-high-ability-learners/section-92-3-004-identification-procedures

18.

Kell

H. J.

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2013). Who rises to the top? Early indicators. Psychological Science, 24(5), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457784

19.

Lakin

J. M.

(2018). Making the cut in gifted selection: Score combination rules and their impact on program diversity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752099

20.

Lee

L. E.

Ottwein

J. K.

Peters

S. J.

(2020). Eight universal truths of identifying students for advanced academic interventions. In Jolly

J. L.

Robins

J. H.

(eds), Methods & materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 61–79). Prufrock Press.

21.

Lockhart

Meyer

M. S.

Crutchfield

(2021). A content analysis of selected state plans for gifted and talented education. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211026240

22.

Lockhart

Mun

R. U.

(2020). Developing a strong home-school connection to better identify and serve culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 43(4), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520940743

23.

Makel

M. C.

Kell

H. J.

Lubinski

Putallaz

Benbow

C. P.

(2016). When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644735

24.

McBee

M. T.

Peters

S. J.

Miller

E. M.

(2016). The impact of the nomination stage on gifted program identification: A comprehensive psychometric analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(4), 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216656256

25.

Meyer

M. S.

(2021a, August). Eliminating barriers to equity and excellence: Illinois District U-46. Equity & Access Pre K-12. https://www.ace-ed.org/august-2021-issue/

26.

Meyer

M. S.

(2021b, December). The after School Excellence Network (ASEN): Long-term solutions for reducing excellence gaps. Equity & Access Pre K-12. https://ace-ed.org/issue-16-december-2021/

27.

Meyer

M. S.

(2021c, May). Reducing excellence gaps: The Gadsden elementary school district early college program. Equity & Access Pre K-12. https://www.ace-ed.org/may-jun-2021/

28.

Meyer

M. S.

Plucker

J. A.

(2021). What’s in a name? Rethinking “gifted” to promote equity and excellence. Gifted Education International. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211038988

29.

Mun

Langley

S. D.

Ware

Gubbins

E. J.

Siegle

Callahan

C. M.

McCoach

D. B.

Hamilton

(2016). Effective practices for identifying and serving English learners in gifted education: A systematic review of the literature. https://ncrge.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/982/2016/01/NCRGE_EL_Lit-Review.pdf

30.

National Center for Education Statistics . (2021). Public school districts. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/

31.

National Association for Gifted Children (2019). Pre-k-grade 12 gifted programming standards. https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/resources/national-standards-gifted-and-talented-education/pre-k-grade-12

32.

Omaha Public Schools (2021). Gifted and talented education. https://www.ops.org/gifted

33.

Peters

S. J.

Carter

Plucker

J. A.

(2020). Rethinking how we identify “gifted” students. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(4), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720978055

34.

Peters

S. J.

Gentry

Whiting

G. W.

McBee

M. T.

(2019a). Who gets served in gifted education? Demographic representation and a call for action. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219833738

35.

Peters

S. J.

Makel

M. C.

Rambo-Hernandez

(2021). Local norms for gifted and talented student identification: Everything you need to know. Gifted Child Today, 44(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520985181

36.

Peters

S. J.

Matthews

M. S.

McBee

M. T.

McCoach

D. B.

(2014). Beyond gifted education: Designing and implementing advanced academic programs. Prufrock Press.

37.

Peters

S. J.

Rambo-Hernandez

Makel

M. C.

Matthews

M. S.

Plucker

J. A.

(2019b). Effect of local norms on racial and ethnic representation in gifted education. AERA Open, 5(2), Article 233285841984844. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419848446

38.

Plucker

J. A.

(2021). Supply is the missing variable in selective school equity debates. Education Next. https://www.educationnext.org/supply-is-missing-variable-in-selective-school-equity-debates/

39.

Plucker

J. A.

Makel

M. C.

Matthews

M. S.

Peters

S. J.

Rambo-Hernandez

K. E.

(2017). Blazing new trails: Strengthening policy research in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701838

40.

Plucker

J. A.

McWilliams

Guo

(2021). Smart contexts for 21st-century talent development. In Sternberg

R. J.

Ambrose

(eds), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 295–316). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_17

41.

Plucker

J. A.

Peters

S. J.

(2016). Excellence gaps in education: Expanding opportunities for talented students. Harvard Education Press.

42.

Plucker

J. A.

Peters

S. J.

Schmalensee

(2017). Reducing excellence gaps: A research-based model. Gifted Child Today, 40(4), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517723949

43.

Regulations Governing Educational Services for Gifted Students . (2012). https://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/gifted_ed/gifted_regulations.pdf

44.

Rinn

A. N.

(2020). Social, emotional, and psychosocial development of gifted and talented individuals. Prufrock Academic Press.

45.

Rinn

A. N.

Mun

R. U.

Hodges

(2020). 2018-2019 State of the states in gifted education. National Association of Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. https://www.nagc.org/2018-2019-state-states-gifted-education

46.

Wai

Lakin

J. M.

(2020). Finding the missing Einsteins: Expanding the breadth of cognitive and noncognitive measures used in academic services. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101920

47.

Wells

(2020). Achieving equity: Dismantling barriers and tapping potential. Prufrock Press.