In recent years, state and local support for academic acceleration has created opportunities for students with advanced learning needs to move through their education at a pace that matches their abilities and may be faster than their same-age peers. As a result, it is not uncommon for exceptionally bright students to complete their high school graduation requirements early. These students have the option to stay in high school and complete additional coursework or move on to postsecondary settings to continue their academic talent development. This article explores state and local policies on early graduation and highlights supportive policies and potential barriers to this type of acceleration.
AssoulineS. G.ColangeloN.VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2015) A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students (1). Belin-Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development. http://www.accelerationinstitute.org/nation_empowered.
2.
BoardmanC. W. (1943). Findings from selected studies on early admission to college. The School Review, 51(8), 460-470. https://doi.org/10.1086/440952.
3.
BrodyL. E.MuratoriM. C. (2015). Early entrance to college: Academic, social, and emotional considerations. In AssoulineS. G.ColangeloN.VanTassel-BaskaJ. (Eds), A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students (2, pp. 153-169). http://www.accelerationinstitute.org/nation_empowered.
4.
CallahanC. M.MoonT. R.OhS. (2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 20-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686215.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (2004) A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (1). Belin-Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development. https://www.accelerationinstitute.org/nation_deceived/nd_v1.pdf.
7.
DaiD. Y.RinnA. N. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond effect: What do we know and where do we go from here?Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 283-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9071-x.
GrossM. U. M.Van VlietH. E. (2005). Radical acceleration and early entry to college: A review of the research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(2), 154-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900205.
JettN.RinnA. N. (2019). Radically early college entrants on radically early college entrance: A heuristic inquiry. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(4), 303-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219874430.
RinnA. N.MunR. U.HodgesJ. (2020). 2018-2019 State of the states in gifted education. National Association of Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. https://www.nagc.org/2018-2019-state-states-gifted-education.
23.
Selective Service and Training Act (1940). 50 U.S.C. 54 Stat. 885.
24.
SouthernW. T.JonesE. D. (2015). Types of acceleration: dimensions and issues. In AssoulineS. G.ColangeloN.VanTassel-BaskaJ. (Eds), A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 9-18). http://www.accelerationinstitute.org/nation_empowered.
Steenburgen-HuS.MakelM. C.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849-899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417.
