Crossing Discipline Boundaries in Gifted Science Instruction: Definitions,Considerations,and Challenges

Abstract

This article focuses on the important instructional technique of integrated or interdisciplinary instruction with reference to the teaching of science but with implications for all school subjects. Readers are provided with a definition of the concept of the discipline and the importance of communicating the basic nature of a discipline to students in school settings. This leads to the concept of the levels of intradisciplinarity and later to the true “border crossing” that occurs when students must draw upon knowledge and practices from multiple disciplinary traditions when engaged in problem solving. The article concludes with a discussion of a recent trend in science instruction and consider the challenges of some forms of STEM curriculum designs.

Keywords

curriculum instructional strategies best practices interdisciplinary instruction nature of the discipline intradisciplinary instruction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cotton

(2019). Using an interdisciplinary approach with problem-based learning for gifted learners. Learning to Teach, 8(1), 111–116. https://openjournals.utoledo.edu/index.php/learningtoteach/article/view/292

Graff

H. J.

(2015). Undisciplining knowledge: Interdisciplinarity in the twentieth century. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hirst

P.H.

(1974). Liberal education and the nature of knowledge. In Hirst

P.H.

(Ed.), Knowledge and the curriculum: A collection of philosophical papers (pp. 23–40). Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Jenkins

R. A.

(2005). Interdisciplinary instruction in the inclusion classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(5), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990503700506

Krishnan

(2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. [working paper]. University of Southampton UK: National Centre for Research Methods. https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/783/1/what_are_academic_disciplines.pdf

Kurt

(2020). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and scaffolding. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/vygotskys-zone-of-proximal-development-and-scaffolding/

McComas

W. F.

(2009). Thinking, teaching, and learning science outside the boxes: Interdisciplinarity in science instruction. The Science Teacher, 76(2), 24–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i24143211

McComas

W. F.

(2020). Principle elements of nature of science: Informing science teaching while dispelling the myths. In McComas

W.F.

(Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction (pp. 35–65). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6

McComas

W. F.

Burgin

S. A.

(2020). A critique of STEM education: Revolution-in-the making, passing fad, or instructional imperative? Science & Education, 29(4), 805–829. https:doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00138-2.

10.

McComas

W. F.

Wang

H. A.

(1998). Blended science instruction: The promise and peril of reconnecting the sciences for instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 340–348. https://doi/org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17430.x

11.

National Research Council (2014). STEM integration in K–12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.

12.

Olson

J. K.

(2018). On jackalopes, STEM, and the rapid decline of elementary science instruction. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Science Teacher Education, Baltimore, MD, 4-6 January, 2018.

13.

Phenix

P. H.

(1964). Realms of meaning: A philosophy of the curriculum for general education. McGraw-Hill Book Company.

14.

Phillips

D. C.

Soltis

J. F.

(2004). Perspectives on learning (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

15.

Smith

(2015). Interconnections to enhance theoretical talent development: Using metaphor to reflect on Ambrose’s insights for gifted education. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 3(2), 77–92.

16.

Sriraman

Dahl Søndergaard

(2009). On bringing interdisciplinary ideas to gifted education. In Shavinina

L. V.

(Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 1235–1256). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_64