Parents, teachers, counselors, and others are rightfully concerned about how to support students with gifts and talents in making friends while maintaining their interest in learning. Building on decades of research, the authors describe the model of High-Ability Students' Friendship Development Process. This process is described in a flowchart and clarifies points of intervention. When those who work with students with gifts and talents are aware of the importance that differences in ability make in their friendships, they can guide them toward building healthy relationships.
ColemanL. J.MickoK. J.CrossT. L. (2015). Twenty-five years of research on the lived experience of being gifted in school: capturing the students’ voices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(4), 358-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321560732
4.
CrossJ. R. (2016). Gifted children and peer relationships. In NeihartM.PfeifferS.CrossT. L. (Eds.), Social and emotional development of gifted children (2nd ed., pp. 41-54). National Association for Gifted Children.
5.
CrossT. L. (2018). On the social and emotional lives of gifted children: Factors and issues in their psychological development (5th ed.). Prufrock Press.
6.
CrossT. L.ColemanL. J.StewartR. A. (1993). The school-based social cognition of gifted adolescents: An exploration of the stigma of giftedness paradigm. Roeper Review, 16(1), 37-40.
7.
CrossT. L.ColemanL. J.StewartR. A. (1995). Psychosocial diversity of gifted adolescents: an exploration of the stigma of the giftedness paradigm. Roeper Review, 17(3), 181-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553655
8.
CrossT. L.ColemanL.Terhaar-YonkersM. (1991). The social cognition of gifted adolescents in schools: managing the stigma of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353229101500106
9.
CrossT. L.CrossJ. R. (2021). A school-based conception of giftedness: clarifying roles and responsibilities in the development of talent in our public schools. In SternbergR. J.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 83-98). Palgrave MacMillan.
10.
CrossJ. R.VaughnC. T.MammadovS.CrossT. L.KimM.O’ReillyC., et al. (2019). A cross-cultural study of the social experience of giftedness. Roeper Review, 41(4), 224-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1661052
11.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
12.
ExlineJ. J.LobelM. (1999). The perils of outperformance: sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 307-337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.307
13.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: a proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
14.
SwiatekM. A. (2001). Social coping among gifted high school students and its relationship to self-concept. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005268704144
15.
TannenbaumA. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. Macmillan.
16.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
17.
ZellA.ExlineJ. J.LobelM. (2020). Navigating the perils of outperforming others. In SulsJ.CollinsR. L.WheelerL. (Eds.), Social comparison, judgment, and behavior (pp. 280-308). Oxford University Press.
