Gifted education in the United States has a long history of underrepresentation of culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse (CLED) gifted students. Despite the many years of attention toward this pervasive problem, the gap in equity and access to gifted services for CLED students has not closed due to a variety of practices related to assessments, teacher referrals, and support structures. The authors contend that many issues stem from a common underlying cause: a lack of cultural knowledge and competency pertaining to gifted youth. This article presents guiding principles based in professional learning, equity, and gifted pedagogy for use in crafting training experiences: pulse-taking, establishing safe zones, individualizing professional learning plans, cultural training beyond surface-level, school/home connections, identifying grows and glows, and engaging in courageous conversations.
BaudsonT. G.PreckelF. (2013). Teachers’ implicit personality theories about the gifted: An experimental approach. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000011
2.
BriggsC. J.ReisS. M.SullivanE. E. (2008). A national view of promising programs and practices for culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208316037
FordD. Y. (2014). Segregation and the underrepresentation of Blacks and Hispanics in gifted education: Social inequality and deficit paradigms. Roeper Review, 36(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.919563
8.
FordD. Y.DicksonK. T.DavisJ. L.Trotman ScottM. F.GranthamT. C. (2018). A culturally responsive equity-based bill of rights for gifted students of color. Gifted Child Today, 41(3), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518769698
9.
FordD. Y.GranthamT. C. (2011). Using the NAGC gifted programming standards to create programs and services for culturally and linguistically different gifted students. In JohnsonS. K. (Ed.), NAGC pre-K-grade 12 gifted education programming standards: A guide to planning and implementing high-quality services (pp. 45–70). Prufrock Press.
10.
FordD. Y.MooreJ. L.MilnerR. (2005). Beyond culture blindness: A model of culture with implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 27(2), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554297
11.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
12.
GilsonC. (2018). Moving toward differentiated professional learning for teachers learning to differentiate for gifted students. In NovakA. M.WeberC. L. (Eds.), Best practices in professional learning and teacher preparation: Methods and strategies for gifted professional development (Vol. 1, pp. 93–120). Prufrock Press.
GranthamT. C.BiddleW. H. (2014). From bystander to upstander teacher for gifted black students accused of acting White. Gifted Child Today, 37(3), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514530117
16.
GunnlaugsonO. (2007). Shedding light on the underlying forms of transformative learning: Introducing three distinct categories of consciousness. Journal of Transformative Education, 5(2), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344607303526
HodgesJ.TayJ.MaedaY.GentryM. (2018). A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752107
19.
IrbyB.Lara-AlecioR. (1996). Attributes of Hispanic gifted bilingual students as perceived by bilingual educators in Texas. SABE Journal, 11, 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752107
LewisK. D.NovakA. M. (2019). Identifying and supporting culturally, linguistically and economically diverse gifted learners: Guiding teachers through the four zones of professional learning. In NovakA. M.WeberC. L. (Eds.), Best practices in professional learning and teacher preparation: Special topics for gifted professional development (Vol. 2, pp. 133–158). Prufrock Press.
23.
LewisK. D.NovakA.CoronadoJ. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of characteristics of gifted Hispanic bilingual students: Perspectives from the border. Texas Forum of Teacher Education, 5, 71–91.
24.
LewisK. D.NovakA. M.WeberC. L. (2018). Where are gifted students of color? Case studies outline strategies to increase diversity in gifted programs. The Learning Professional, 39(4), 50–58. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1190300
25.
LewisK. D.NovakA. M.WeberC. L. (in press). Using case studies to develop equity-driven professional learning for gifted educators. Gifted Child Today.
26.
MatheisS.KronborgL.SchmittM.PreckelF. (2017). Threat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation. Gifted and Talented International, 32(2), 2134–2160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2018.1537685
27.
MooreB. A. (2018). Developing special educator cultural awareness through critically reflective professional learning community collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406418770714
28.
MooreJ. L.FordD. Y.MilnerH. R. (2005). Recruitment is not enough: Retaining African American students in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900106
NelsonS. W.GuerraP. L. (2014). Educator beliefs and cultural knowledge: Implications for school improvement efforts. Educational Administration, 50(1), 67–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13488595
35.
PreckelF.BaudsonT. G.Krolak-SchwerdtS.GlockS. (2015). Gifted and maladjusted? Implicit attitudes and automatic associations related to gifted children. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1160–1184. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215596413
SnyderT. D.de BreyC.DillowS. A. (2016). Digest of education statistics (NCES 2016-014). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Services, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016014.pdf
