For gifted girls, the journey toward self-actualization can be particularly challenging during adolescence. To better support gifted adolescent girls, this article explores a contemporary framework for understanding smart girls of the 21st century: Kerr and McKay’s beehive of smart girls. Kerr and McKay’s typology highlights how different combinations of characteristics ultimately create rich variations of gifts and talents—instead of assuming all smart girls have the same characteristics, experiences, and visions. Building on their framework, this article (a) offers additional insights into how each type of smart girl may experience gifted adolescence, (b) suggests potential barriers to self-actualization each type of smart girl may face, and (c) invites voices of educators from middle and high school classrooms to share their own reflections and insights of how they have come to know each type of smart girl.
BarberC.MuellerC. T. (2011). Social and self-perceptions of adolescents identified as gifted, learning disabled, and twice-exceptional. Roeper Review, 33, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.554158
2.
CallahanC. M. (1994). Foundations for the future: The socio-emotional development of gifted, adolescent women. Roeper Review, 17, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199409553634
3.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 139–167.
DelisleJ.GalbraithJ. (2002). When gifted kids don’t have all the answers: How to meet their social and emotional needs (2nd ed.). Free Spirit.
6.
Evans-WintersV. E. (2014). Are Black girls not gifted? Race, gender, and resilience. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching & Learning, 4(1), 22–31.
7.
KerrB. A.McKayR. (2013). Searching for tomorrow’s innovators: Profiling creative adolescents. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752180
8.
KerrB. A.McKayR. (2014). Smart girls in the 21st century: Understanding talented girls and women. Great Potential Press.
9.
KwanK. K.WilsonW. J. (2009). Counseling gifted students from non-White racial groups: Conceptual perspectives and practical suggestions. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. L.CrossT. L.OlenchakF. R. (Eds.), Social-emotional curriculum with gifted and talented students (pp. 133–151). Prufrock Press.
10.
MaslowA. H. (1962). Some basic propositions of a growth and self-actualization psychology. In CombsA. W. (Ed.), Perceiving, behaving, belonging: A new focus on education (pp. 34–49). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11.
MaslowA. H. (1965). Self-actualization and beyond. In Presentation at the conference of counselors of adults (pp. 1–27). New England Board of Higher Education; Center for the Study of Liberal Education for Adults. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED012056.pdf
12.
MoonS. M. (2009). Myth 15: High-ability students don’t face problems and challenges. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 274–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346943
13.
MoonS. M.DixonF. A. (2006). Conceptions of giftedness in adolescence. In DixonF. A.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 7–33). Prufrock Press.
PetersonJ. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 280–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346946
RudasillK. M.FoustR. C.CallahanC. M. (2007). The Social Coping Questionnaire: An examination of its structure with an American sample of gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320703000304
18.
RuncoM. A.CramondB.PagnaniA. R. (2010). Gender and creativity. In ChrislerJ.McCrearyD. (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 343–357). Springer.
19.
SchulerP. A. (2000). Perfectionism and gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 183–196. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2000-629
20.
ScottM. T. (2014). Resisting dark chocolate: A journey through racial identity and deficit thinking: A case study and solutions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 43–55.
21.
TorranceE. P. (1979). The search for satori and creativity. Creative Education Foundation.
22.
TorranceE. P.SafterH. T. (1990). The incubation model of teaching: Getting beyond the aha!Bearly.
