This article presents a description of the potential impacts from six different school-based evaluations, based on the perceptions of program coordinators and evaluators 1 to 3 years after the evaluation was conducted. It shares data on what recommendations of the evaluation were implemented and the rationale behind these decisions. Coordinators also commented on the perceived value and benefit of having the evaluation conducted and provided thoughts about having an evaluation conducted in the future. The article concludes with a set of lessons learned from the evaluation experience.
CallahanC. M.MoonT. R.OhS. (2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40, 20-49.
2.
CallahanC. M.ReisS. M. (Eds.). (2004). Program evaluation in gifted education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
3.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
RogersK. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382-396.
6.
Speirs NeumeisterK.BurneyV. (2012). Gifted program evaluation: A handbook for administrators and coordinators. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
7.
TomlinsonC. A.BlandL. C.MoonT. R.CallahanC. M. (1994). Case studies of evaluation utilization in gifted education. Evaluation Practice, 15, 153-168.
8.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2006). A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: A Clarion call for enhanced gifted program development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 199-215.
9.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.FengA. (2004). Designing and utilizing evaluation for gifted program improvement. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
