Given the need to increase Black males’ participation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), this study employed a multiple case studies approach to investigate the perceptions of identity to STEM possibilities of Black males who participated in advanced placement and math and science courses. A conceptual framework of self-efficacy and science identity was utilized to examine their perceptions. Three themes that emerged from data analysis included the following: Establishing the Possibilities of a STEM Identity, Self-Efficacy: Conflicting Self-Identity Formation, and Community Support Integral to Positive Self-Identity. The authors offer three recommendations for practitioners to cultivate Black males’ STEM identity and, subsequently, STEM possibilities in the future.
AckermanP. L.KanferR.CalderwoodC. (2013). High school advanced placement and student performance in college: STEM majors, non-STEM majors, and gender differences. Teachers College Record, 115, 1-43.
2.
AveryC.GurantzO.HurwitzM.SmithJ. (2017). Shifting college majors in response to advanced placement exam scores. Journal of Human Resources, 52(4), 1-53. doi:10.3368/jhr.53.4.1016-8293R
3.
BandaR. M. (2012). Perceptions of social support networks and climate in the persistence of Latinas pursuing an undergraduate engineering degree (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station.
4.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BanduraA. (1997). Personal efficacy in psychobiologic functioning. In CapraraG. V. (Ed.), Bandura: A leader in psychology (pp. 43-66). Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
6.
BaumS.MaJ.PayeaK. (2010). Education pays 2010: The benefits of higher education for individual and society. New York, NY: College Board.
7.
BonnerI. I. (2010). Gifted African American male college students. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
8.
CarloneH. B.JohnsonA. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187-1218.
9.
CasementW. (2003). Declining credibility for the AP program. Academic Questions, 16(4), 11-25.
FlowersA. M. (2011). Academically gifted, poor African American males undergraduates in engineering disciplines: Perceptions of factors contributing to success in a predominantly White institution (PWI) and historically Black college and university (HBCU) Context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station.
13.
FlowersA. M.BandaR. M. (2015). The masculinity paradox: Conceptualizing the experiences of men of color in STEM. The Journal of Culture, Society, and Masculinity, 7, 45-60.
14.
FlowersA. M.BandaR. M. (2016). Cultivating science identity through principles of self-efficacy. Journal for Multicultural Education, 10, 405-417.
15.
HawkinsL. (1970). Urban school teaching: The personal touch In WrightN.Jr. (Ed.), What Black educators are saying (pp. 43-47). New York, NY: Hawthorn Books.
16.
JudgeT. A.JacksonC. L.ShawJ. C.ScottB. A.RichB. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 107-127.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
MatternK. D.ShawE. J.EwingM. (2011). Advanced placement exam participation: Is AP exam participation and performance related to choice of college major? (College Board Research Report No. 2011-6). New York, NY: The College Board. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562647.pdf
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study in research and education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
MuseusS. D.PalmerR. T.DavisR. J.MarambaD. C. (2011). Racial and ethnic minority students’ success in STEM education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 36(6), 1-140.
24.
National Science Board. (2015). Revisiting the STEM workforce: A companion to science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsb201510/nsb201510.pdf
PajaresF. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. In GallagherA. M.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 294-315). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America’s future: Executive report. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://nsf.gov/attachments/117803/public/2a–Prepare_and_Inspire–PCAST.pdf
29.
RittmayerA. D.BeierM. E. (2009). Self-efficacy in STEM. In BogueB.CadyE. (Eds.), Applying research to practice (ARP) resources. Retrieved from http://www.engr.psu.edu/AWE/ARPresources.aspx
30.
RobinsonP. A.LewisC. W. (2011). The troubling context of urban education: Instructional design as a source of transformation for students of color. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 8, 109-112.
31.
SadlerP. M.SonnertG.TaiR. H.KlopfensteinK. (2010). AP: A critical examination of the advanced placement program. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
32.
ShawE. J.BarbutiS. (2010). Patterns of persistence in intended college major with a focus on STEM majors. NACADA Journal, 30(2), 19-34.
33.
SmithK.JagesicS.WyattJ.EwingM. (2018). AP stem participation and postsecondary STEM outcomes: Focus on minority, first-generation, and female students (College board research report). New York, NY: The College Board.
34.
StraussA. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35.
StrayhornT. L. (2015). Factors influencing Black males’ preparation for college and success in STEM majors: A mixed methods study. Western Journal of Black Studies, 39, 45-63.
36.
TaiR. H.LiuC. Q.AlmarodeJ. T.FanX. (2010). Advanced placement course enrollment and long range educational outcomes. In SadlerP. M.SonnertG.TaiR. H.KlopfensteinK. (Eds.), AP: A critical examination of the advanced placement program (pp. 109-137). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
