This article provides an overview of recent developments in gifted education in Ireland. It highlights changes in attitudes, educational policies, gifted education programs, and research.
BenbowC. P.StanleyJ. C. (1983). Academic precocity: Aspects of its development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
BrodyL. E. (1998). The talent searches: A catalyst for change in higher education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 124-133.
3.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
4.
ColemanL. J.CrossT. L. (1988). Is being gifted a social handicap?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 4, 41-56.
5.
CosgroveJ.PerkinsR.MoranG.ShielG. (2011). PISA 2009: Results for Ireland and changes since 2000. Dublin, Ireland: Educational Research Centre.
6.
CosgroveJ.ShielG.SofroniouN.SaztrutzkiS.ShorttF. (2005). Education for life: The achievements of 15-year-olds in Ireland in the second cycle of PISA. Dublin, Ireland: Educational Research Centre.
7.
CrossJ. R. (2016, October). Understanding gifted education in Ireland: CTYI parents speak out. Centre for Talented Youth Annual Parents’ Conference, Dublin, Ireland.
8.
CrossJ. R.KimM.O’ReillyC.De CostaM. P. (2016, March). A cross-cultural study of the social experience of giftedness. Paper presentation at the European Council on High Ability conference, Vienna, Austria.
9.
CrossJ. R.O’ReillyC.CrossT. L. (2016, March). Psychosocial profiles of Irish gifted secondary students. Paper presentation at the European Council on High Ability conference, Vienna, Austria.
10.
CrossJ. R.O’ReillyC.KimM.MammadovS.CrossT. L. (2015). Social coping and self-concept among young gifted students in Ireland and the United States: A cross-cultural study. High Ability Studies, 26, 39-61.
11.
CrossJ. R.O’ReillyC.MammadovS.CrossT. L. (2014). Gifted education in Ireland: Educators beliefs and practices. Dublin, Ireland: Dublin City University press.
12.
CrossT. L.CrossJ. R. (2016, December). Secondary student study report to CTYI Board (Unpublished report).
13.
Department of Education and Science. (1993). Report of the Special Education Review Committee (SERC). Dublin, Ireland: The Stationery Office.
14.
Department of Education and Science. (1998). Education act, 1998. Dublin, Ireland: The Stationery Office.
15.
Department of Education and Science. (2005). An evaluation of curriculum implementation in primary schools—English, mathematics and visual arts. Dublin, Ireland: The Stationary Office.
16.
EnersonD. L. (1993). Summer residential programs: Academics and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 169-176.
17.
FeldhusenJ. F.RuckmanD. R. (1988). A guide to the development of Saturday programs for gifted and talented youth. Gifted Child Today, 11(5), 56-61.
18.
FeldhusenJ. F.SokolL. (1982). Extra programming to meet the needs of gifted youth: Super Saturday. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 51-56.
19.
FeldhusenJ. F.WymanA. R. (1980). Super Saturday: Design and implementation of Purdue’s special program for gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24, 15-21.
20.
FreemanJ. (1992). Education for gifted in a changing Europe. Roeper Review, 14, 198-201.
GoldringE. B. (1990). Assessing the status of information on classroom organizational frameworks for gifted students. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 313-326.
23.
GrossU. M. (2003). International perspectives. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), The handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 547-557) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
JanosP. M.RobinsonN. M.LunneborgC. E. (1989). Markedly early entrance to college: A multiyear comparative study of academic performance and psychological adjustment. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 495-518.
25.
LeeS.-Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP.MakelM. C.PutallazM. (2015). Gifted students’ perceptions of an accelerated summer program and social support. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 265-282.
26.
JohnO. P.DonahueE. M.KentleR. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California.
27.
JollyJ. L. (2009). The national defense education act, current STEM initiative, and the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 32(2), 50-53.
28.
KimL. (2013). Meritocracy, elitism, and egalitarianism: A preliminary and provisional assessment of Singapore’s primary education review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33, 1-14.
29.
KimM. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 102-116.
30.
KulikJ. A. (2003). Grouping and tracking. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), The handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 268-281). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
KulikJ. A.KulikC. C. (1984). Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54, 409-425.
32.
LenzK.BurrussJ. D. (1994). Meeting affective needs through summer academic experiences. Roeper Review, 17, 51.
33.
MarlandS. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.
34.
MoonS. M.FeldhusenJ. F.DillonD. R. (1994). Long term effects of an enrichment program based on the Purdue Three Stage Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 38-48.
35.
MoonS. M.RoselliH. C. (2000). Developing gifted programs. In HellerK. A.MonksF. J.SternbergR. J.SubotnikR. F. (Eds.), The international handbook of research on giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 499-521). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
36.
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2007). Exceptionally able students: Draft guidelines for teachers. Dublin, Ireland: Author.
37.
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2008). Exceptionally able students: Draft guidelines for teachers (Draft report on the consultation). Dublin, Ireland: Author.
38.
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2009). Guidelines on acceleration for the highly able pupil. Dublin, Ireland: Author.
39.
NobleK. D.VaughanR. C.ChanC.ChildersS.ChowB.FederowA.HughesS. (2007). Love and work: The legacy of early university entrance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 152-166.
40.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results of PISA 2000. Paris, France: Author.
42.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: Author.
43.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (1989). Development of academic talent: The role of summer programmes. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. L.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners: The home, the self and the school (pp. 421-430). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
44.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (1995). A summary of research regarding early entrance to college. Roeper Review, 18, 121-126.
45.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2003). Special summer and Saturday programs for gifted students. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), The handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 163-173). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
46.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.GrantB. (1996). Academically talented females in mathematics: The role of special programs and support from others in acceleration, achievement and aspiration. In NobleK. D.SubotnikR. F. (Eds.), Remarkable women, Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 281-291), Cresskill, NY: Hampton Press.
47.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.LeeS. (2004). Parent perceptions of the effects of the Saturday enrichment program on gifted students’ talent development. Roeper Review, 26, 156-165.
48.
ParkG.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2013). When less is more: Effects of grade skipping on adult STEM productivity among mathematically precocious adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 176-198.
49.
PluckerJ. A.RobinsonN. M.GreensponT. S.FeldhusenJ. F.McCoachD. B.SubotnikR. F. (2004). It’s not how the pond makes you feel, but rather how high you can jump. American Psychologist, 59, (4) 268-269.
50.
RinnA. N. (2006). Effects of a summer program on the social self-concepts of gifted adolescents. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 65-75.
51.
RobinsonN. M. (1999). Necessity is the mother of invention: The roots of our “system” for providing educational alternatives for gifted students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 120-128.
52.
RobinsJ. (2015). Gifted education in Ireland and the United States: Examples of best practice for teachers and parents. Dublin, Ireland: Centre for Talented Youth Press.
53.
SlavinR. E. (1987). Ability grouping: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293-336.
54.
ShielG.KelleherC.McKeownC.DennerS. (2016). Future ready: The achievements of 15-year-olds in Ireland on mathematics, reading literacy and science in PISA 2015. Dublin, Ireland: Educational Research Centre.
55.
Steenbergen-HuS.MoonS. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 39-53.
56.
TomlinsonC.BrightonC.HertbergH.CallahanC. M.MoonT. R.BrimijoinK.ReynoldsT. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27, 119-145.
57.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1989). Profiles of precocity: A three year study of talented adolescents. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. L.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners: The home, the self and the school (pp. 29-39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
58.
VaughanV. L.FeldhusenJ. F.AsherJ. W. (1991). Meta-analyses and review of research on pull out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 92-105.
59.
WaiJ.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P.SteigerJ. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. American Psychological Association, 102, 860-871.
60.
WhelanC. T.HannanD. F. (1999). Class inequalities in educational attainment among the adult population in the Republic of Ireland. Economic and Social Review, 30, 285-307.
61.
WilderG.CasserlyP. L. (1988). Survey 1: Young Sat takers and their parents. New York, NY: College Board Report.
