Legislation and policy lead to action. In the absence of law or policy, situations are addressed on a case-by-case basis or they are sometimes ignored. Legislation and policy become extremely important when they relate to groups that have traditionally been marginalized, such as students with disabilities or students with gifts and talents, and they can help guarantee or increase access to services for students from those groups. Because legislation and policy focus on students with disabilities at the federal and state levels, schools usually plan to meet the needs of these students. However, gifted and talented education is not mandated at the federal level, and mandates and funding are limited or nonexistent at the state level. Only recently have twice-exceptional learners been acknowledged in law or policy.
AssoulineS. G.Foley NicponM. (2007, Spring). Twice-exceptional learners: Implications for the classroom. Teaching for High Potential, 9-13.
2.
AssoulineS. G.Foley NicponM.DoobayA. (2009). Profoundly gifted girls and autism spectrum disorder: A psychometric case study comparison. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 89-105.
3.
AssoulineS. G.Foley NicponM.WhitemanC. (2010). Cognitive and psychosocial characteristics of gifted students with specific learning disabilities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 102-115. doi:10.1177/001698620935597
4.
BaumS. M.OwenS. V. (1988). High ability/learning disabled students: How are they different?Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 321-326.
5.
Bd. of Educ. of Hendrick Hudson C. Sch. Dist. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 200 (1982).
CrimC.HawkinsJ.RubanL.JohnsonS. (2008). Curricular modifications for elementary students with learning disabilities in high-, average-, and low-IQ groups. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22, 233-245.
8.
Foley NicponM.AllmonA.SieckB.StinsonR. D. (2011). Empirical investigation of twice-exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going?Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 3-17. doi:10/1177/0016986210382575
9.
GallagherJ. J. (1994). Policy design for diversity. In BryantD. M.GrahamM. A. (Eds.), Implementing early intervention: From research to effective practice. (pp. 336-350). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
HallahanD. P.CohenS. B. (2008). Many students with learning disabilities are not receiving special education. Learning Disabilities-Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 3-11.
12.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 600 et seq.
13.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Regulations, 1997, 34 C.F.R. § 300.533 et seq.
ParkerS. L.JohnsenS. K. (2012). What research says about twice-exceptional students: Building partnerships with special educators. Tempo, 32(3), 30-42.
18.
RaywidM. A. (1993). Finding time for collaboration. Educational Leadership, 51, 30-34.
19.
RobertsJ. L. (2014). Advocacy. In PluckerJ. A.CallahanC. M. (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 65-76). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
20.
RobertsJ. L.PereiraN.KnottsJ. D. (2015, April). Current status of twice-exceptional students: A look at legislation, regulation, policy, and standards. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
21.
YellM. L.KatsiyannisA.HazelkornM. (2007). Reflection on the 25th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Board of Education v. Rowley. Focus on Exceptional Children, 39(9), 1-12.
