Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The use of online methods for professional development activities is on the rise, with more schools exploring creative ways of providing teacher learning opportunities. Online professional development offers a promising direction for providing increased learning opportunities, promoting professional collaboration, and supporting teacher facility with technology resources. In gifted education, online activities may present effective ways of connecting gifted education professionals across multiple schools and districts and providing professional learning experiences in gifted education for colleagues in general education. In this article, the authors discuss key features of professional development and considerations for applying them in an online learning context. The authors emphasize the importance of coherence with the curriculum, active engagement, sustained attention, and administrative support. They then discuss five avenues or approaches for implementing online professional development, representing a range of interactive elements and opportunities for blending live and online components. Within each avenue presented, the authors share specific resources that would support implementation in the professional learning context.

Keywords

professional development technology gifted education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Birman

B. F.

Desimone

Porter

A. C.

Garet

M. S.

(2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28-33.

Clarke

Hollingsworth

(2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967.

Dede

(Ed.). (2006). Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Garet

M. S.

Porter

A. C.

Desimone

Birman

B. F.

Yoon

K. S.

(2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.

Guskey

T. R.

(1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers. Eugene, OR: Author. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/NETS

Joyce

B. R.

Showers

(2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Kwakman

(2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149-170. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00101-410.1016/S0742-051X(02)00101-4

Lawless

K. A.

Pellegrino

J. W.

(2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575-614. doi:10.3102/003465430730992110.3102/0034654307309921

10.

Means

Toyama

Murphy

Bakia

Jones

(2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf

11.

National Association for Gifted Children and Council for Exceptional Children. (2006). NAGC-CEC teacher knowledge and skills standards for gifted and talented education. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/uploadedFiles/Information_and_Resources/NCATE_standards/final%20standards%20(2006).pdf

12.

National Staff Development Council. (2001). NSDC’s standards for staff development. Oxford, OH: Author.

13.

Richardson

(2003). The dilemmas of professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 401-406.

14.

Russell

Kleiman

Carey

Douglas

(2009). Comparing self-paced and cohort-based online courses for teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 443-466.

15.

Schlager

M. S.

Fusco

(2004). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? In Barab

Kling

Gray

(Eds.), Designing virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 120-153). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Tinker

(2003). Net courses for staff development. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Family Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.mff.org/edtech/article.taf?_function=detail&Content_uid1=107

17.

Vavasseur

C. B.

MacGregor

S. K.

(2008). Extending content-focused professional development through online communities of practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 517-536.

Avenues to Professional Learning Online

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References