FieldG. B. (2009). The effects of the use of Renzulli Learning on student achievement in reading comprehension, reading fluency, social studies, and science. International Journal of Emerging Technology, 4, 29–39.
2.
FordD. Y.HarrisJ. J. (2002). Multicultural gifted education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
3.
GarciaT.PintrichP. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 127–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
GavinM. K.CasaT. M.AdelsonJ. L.CarrollS. R.SheffieldL. J. (2009). The impact of advanced curriculum on the achievement of mathematically promising elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 188–202.
5.
GavinM. K.CasaT. M.AdelsonJ. L.CarrollS. R.SheffieldL. J.SpinelliA. M. (2007). Project M3: Mentoring Mathematical Minds: Challenging curriculum for talented elementary students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 566–585.
6.
HébertT. H.ReisS. M. (1999). Culturally diverse high-achieving students in an urban high school. Urban Education, 34, 428–457.
7.
KaplanS. N. (2009). The grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In RenzulliJ. S.GubbinsE. J.McMillenK. S.EckertR. D.LittleC. A. (Eds.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 235–252). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
8.
NeihartM.ReisS. M.RobinsonN.MoonS. M. (Eds.). (2001). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
9.
PintrichP. R.De GrootE. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
10.
ReisS. M.BurnsD. E.RenzulliJ. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
11.
ReisS. M.ColbertR. D. (2005). Understanding resilience in diverse, talented students in an urban school. Roeper Review, 27, 110–120.
12.
ReisS. M.EckertR. D.McCoachD. B.JacobsJ. K.CoyneM. (2008). Using enrichment reading practices to increase reading fluency, comprehension, and attitudes. Journal of Educational Research, 101, 299–314.
ReisS. M.GentryM.MaxfieldL. R. (1998). The application of enrichment clusters to teachers' classroom practices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 310–324.
15.
ReisS. M.HébertT. P.DíazE. I.MaxfieldL. R.RatleyM. E. (1995). Case studies of talented students who achieve and underachieve in an urban high school (Research Monograph No. 95120). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
16.
ReisS. M.HousandA. (2009). The impact of gifted education pedagogy and enriched reading practices on reading achievement for urban students in bilingual and English-speaking classes. Journal of Urban Education, 6, 72–86.
17.
ReisS. M.McCoachD. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152–170.
18.
ReisS. M.McCoachD. B.CoyneM.SchreiberF. J.EckertR. D.GubbinsE. J. (2007). Using planned enrichment strategies with direct instruction to improve reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude toward reading: An evidence-based study. The Elementary School Journal, 108, 3–24.
19.
ReisS. M.PurcellJ. H. (1993). An analysis of content elimination and strategies used by elementary classroom teachers in the curriculum compacting process. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 147–170.
20.
ReisS. M.WestbergK. L.KulikowichJ. M.PurcellJ. H. (1998). Curriculum compacting and achievement test scores: What does the research say?Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 123–129.
21.
ReisS. M.RenzulliJ. S. (2003). Research related to the Schoolwide Enrichment Triad Model. Gifted Education International, 18(1), 15–40.
22.
RenzulliJ. S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
23.
RenzulliJ. S.LeppienJ.HayesT. (2000). The Multiple Menu Model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
24.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1985). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
25.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1994). Research related to the Schoolwide Enrichment Triad Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 7–20.
26.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1997). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
27.
ResnickL. B.HallM. W. (with the Fellows of the Institute for Learning). (2005). Principles of learning for effort-based education. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Institute for Learning, Learning Research & Development Center.
28.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ.BrownE. F. (2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 342–358.
29.
ZimmermanB. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.
30.
ZimmermanB. J. (1990). Self-regulated academic learning and achievement: The emergence of a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 173–201.