ColangeloN. (2007). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students. Tempo, 27(4), 9.
2.
Council for Environmental Education. (2005). Project wild: K—12 curriculum and activity guide. Houston, TX: Author.
3.
HohP. (2008). Cognitive characteristics of the gifted. In PluckerJ. A.CallahanC. M. (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 57–84). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
4.
LinnB.ShoreB. M. (2008). Critical thinking. In PluckerJ. A.CallahanC. M. (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 155–166). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
5.
MansillaV. B.GardnerH. (2008). Disciplining the mind. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 14–20.
6.
PaulR.ElderL. (2007). Critical thinking competency standards. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
7.
PaulR.ElderL. (2008). Critical thinking concepts and tools (5th ed.). Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
8.
SaylerM. (2009a). Intellectual growth, school, and thriving of the gifted. Tempo, 29(1), 9–13.
9.
SaylerM. (2009b). Gifted and thriving: A deeper understanding of the meaning of GT. In ShavininaL. (Ed.), The international handbook on giftedness (pp. 215–230). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer Science and Business Media.
SwartzR. J.ParksS. (1994). Infusing the teaching of critical and creative thinking into elementary instruction. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Press.
12.
TomlinsonC. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
13.
TreffingerD. (2006). Creative problem solving: An introduction (4th ed.) Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
WigginsG.McTigheJ. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
16.
WinebrennerS. (2000). Teaching gifted kids in the regular classroom: Strategies and techniques every teacher can use to meet the academic needs of the gifted and talented. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
17.
KeeleyS. P.EberleF.FarrinL. (2005). Uncovering student ideas in science. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
18.
HarveyS.GoudvisA. (2007). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
19.
SmallM. (2009). Good questions: Great ways to differentiate mathematics instruction. Amsterdam, NY: Teacher's College Press.
20.
WillisJ. (2006). Research-based strategies to ignite student learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.