Backer, T.E.
,E.M. Rogers, and P. Sopory. 1992. Designing health communication campaigns. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Bandura, A.
1977. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Bandura, A.
1995. Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Blum, D.
, and M. Knudson. 1997. A field guide for science writers. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Burnham, J.
1987. How superstition won and science lost: Popularizing science and health in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
6.
Ciba Foundation Conference
. 1987. Communicating science to the public. New York: John Wiley.
7.
Council of Scientific Society Presidents
. 1991. Bridging the communications gap: A Wingspread workshop on strengthening relationships between scientists and journalists. Washington, DC: Council of Scientific Society Presidents.
8.
Efron, E.
1985. The Apocalyptics: How environmental politics controls what we know about cancer. New York: Simon & Schuster.
9.
Flay, B. R.1987. Mass media and smoking cessation: A critical review. American Journal of Public Health77:153-162.
10.
Friedman, S. M.
, S. Dunwoody, and C. L. Rogers, eds. 1986. Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news. New York: Free Press.
11.
Friedman, S. M.
, K. Villamil, R. A. Suriano, and B. P. Egolf. 1996. Alar and apples: Newspapers, risk and media responsibility. Public Understanding of Science5 (1): 1-20.
12.
Fumento, M.
1993. Balancing technology and the environment: Science under siege. New York: William Morrow.
13.
Hansen, A.
, ed. 1993. The mass media and environmental issues. New York: Leicester University Press.
14.
Laetsch, W.M.
1987. A basis for better public understanding of science. In Communicating science to the public, Ciba Foundation Conference, 1-10. New York: John Wiley.
15.
Logan, R.
1991. Popularization versus secularization: Media coverage of health. In Risky business: Communicating issues of science, risk, and public policy, edited by L. Wilkins and P. Patterson, 43-59. New York: Greenwood.
16.
Logan, R.
, P. Zengjun, and N. Wilson. 1998. Evaluating assertions about science writing, reporting and news selection: A content analysis of The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology, 17-19 September, Berlin, Germany.
17.
McMillan, J. H.
, and D. R. Forsyth. 1991. What theories of motivation say about why learners learn. In College teaching: From theory to practice, edited by R. J. Menges and M. D. Svinick, 39-52. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Nelkin, D.
1995. Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. Rev. ed.New York: Freeman.
19.
Palen, J.1998. Worlds Apart a disappointment. Sciphers18 (4): 3-4.
20.
Pellechia, M.G.1997. Trends in science coverage: A content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science6 (1): 49-68.
21.
Prewitt, K.1982. The public and science policy. Science, Technology, & Human Values36:5-14.
22.
Prewitt, K.1983. Scientific illiteracy and democratic theory. Daedalus112:49-64.
23.
Rakow, L. F.
1989. Information and power: Toward a critical theory of information campaigns. In Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change, edited by C. Salmon, 164-184. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Salmon, C.
1989. Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Tobey, R.
1971. The American ideology of natural science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
26.
Trachtman, L.1981. The public understanding of science effort: A critique. Science, Technology, & Human Values36: 10-15.
27.
Warner, K. E.
1989. The epidemiology of coffin nails. In Health risks and the press, edited by M. Moore, 73-88. Washington, DC: The Media Institute.
28.
Wilkins, L.
, and P. Patterson, eds. 1991. Risky business: Communicating issues of science, risk, and public policy. New York: Greenwood.
29.
Winett, R. A.
, A. C. King, and D. G. Altman. 1994. Health psychology and public health: An integrative approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
Yankelovich, D.1982. Changing public attitudes to science and the quality of life. Science, Technology, & Human Values39:23-29.
31.
Yankelovich, D.
1991. Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
32.
Zimmerman, B. J.
1995. Self-efficacy in educational development. In Self-efficacy in changing societies, edited by A. Bandura, 202-231. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
