The goal of this study was to examine how policymakers at the local community level use social
science information in making decisions The assumption which guided the study is that the use
of social science information is related to how it interacts with other information and with the
ideology and interests of the policymaker in the decision-making process. Findings from the
study revealed that policymakers drew on a variety of information sources. The use of social
science information was dependent on the ideology and interests of the decisionmakers and on
the specific circumstances which shaped the decision-making process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Caplan, N.1977. A minimal set of conditions necessary for the utilization of social science knowledge in policy formulation at the national level. In Using social science research in public policy making, edited by Carol A. Weiss, 183-97. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
2.
Coalition for Rural Health.1988. The community health services development program. Spokane, WA. Eastern Washington Office of Rural Health.
3.
Coleman, J.1972. Policy research in the social sciences. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press
4.
DeMartini, J.R., and L. Whitbeck.1986Knowledge use as knowledge creation Knowledge . Creation, Diffusion, Utilization7 (4): 383-96
5.
Giordano, R., J. Cole, and H. Zuckerman.1987. The generalized automated text organization and retrieval system. New York: Columbia University
6.
Knorr, K.D.1977. Policymakers' use of social science knowledge. Symbolic or instrumental? In Using social science research in public policy making, edited by Carol A. Weiss, 165-81. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
7.
Lassey, W.R., and B.A. Amundson.1990. Rural health services development: Rationale, process, and experience. Spokane, WA: Eastern Washington Area Health Education Center.
8.
Lynn, L.E., Jr.1978. Knowledge and public policy: The uncertain connection . Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
9.
Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman.1984. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook for new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Nelson, C., J. Roberts, C.M. Maederer, B. Wertheimer, and B. Johnson.1987. The utilization of social science information by policymakers. The American Behavioral Scientist30 (6): 569-77.
11.
Patton, M.Q., P.S. Grimes, K.M. Guthrie, N.J. Brennan, B.D. French, and D.A. Blyth.1977. In search of impact: An analysis of the utilization of federal health evaluation research. In Using social science research in public policy making, edited by Carol A. Weiss, 141-63. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
12.
Rich, R.F.1977. Uses of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action versus knowledge for understanding. In Using social science research in public policy making, edited by Carol A. Weiss, 199-211Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
13.
Rosenblatt, R.1991. The WAMI rural hospital project. The Journal of Rural Health7 (5): 473-91.
14.
Schroeder, H.M., M.J. Driver, and S. Streufert.1969. Human information processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston .
15.
Van deVall, M., and C. Bolas.1980. Applied social discipline research or social policy research: The emergence of a professional paradigm in sociological research. The American Sociological Review45:128-37.
16.
Weiss, C.H.1978. Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. In Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection , edited by L. E. Lynn, 23-81. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
17.
—. 1983. Ideology, interests, and information. In Ethics, the social sciences, and policy analysis, edited by Daniel Callahan and Bruce Jennings, 213-45. New York: Plenum.
18.
Weiss, C.H., and M.J. Bucuvalas.1980. Truth tests and utility tests: Decision makers' frames of reference for social science research. American Sociological Review45:302-13.
