Experiments are relatively uncommon in knowledge utilization research compared with
nonexperimental methods. This article reviews the perceived weaknesses and strengths
of experimental methods and discusses possible uses of experiments in knowledge utilization research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alemi, F. (1987) "Subjective and objective methods of evaluating social programs." Evaluation Rev.11: 765-774.
2.
Babbie, E. (1975) The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3.
Bannister, D. (1966) "Psychology as an exercise in paradox." Bull. of the British Psych. Society19: 21-26.
4.
Bass, A. and I. Firestone (1980) "Implications of representativeness for generalizability of field and laboratory research." Amer. Psychologist35: 463-464.
5.
Bednarz, D. (1983) "Quantity and quality in evaluation research: a divergent view." Revised version of a paper presented at the joint meeting of the Evaluation Network and the Evaluation Research Society, Chicago.
6.
Brunswik, E. (1943) "Organismic achievement and environmental probability ." Psych. Rev.50: 255-272.
7.
Brunswik, E. (1952) "The conceptual framework of psychology," pp. 1-102 in O. Neurath et al. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 1, no. 10. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.
8.
Brunswik, E. (1956) Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley : Univ. of California Press.
9.
Calder, B., L. Phillips, and A. Tybout (1981) "Designing research for application." J. of Consumer Research8: 197-207.
10.
Campbell, D.T. (1969) "Reforms as experiments." Amer. Psychologist24: 409-429.
11.
Campbell, D.T. and D.W. Fiske (1959) "Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix." Psych. Bull.56: 81-105.
12.
Campbell, D.T. and J.C. Stanley (1966) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally .
13.
Caplan, N. (1979) "The two communities theory and knowledge utilization ." Amer. Behavioral Scientist22: 459-470.
14.
Collingwood, R. (1940) An Essay on Metaphysics. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
15.
Cook, T. and D.T. Campbell (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
Dipboye, R. and M. Flanagan (1979) "Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology: are findings in the field more generalizable than in the laboratory ?" Amer. Psychologist34: 141-150.
Dunn, W.N., M. Dukes, and A. Cahill (1984) "Designing utilization research." Knowledge5: 387-404.
19.
Dunn, W.N. and B. Holzner (1988) "Knowledge in society: anatomy of an emergent field." Knowledge in Society1: 3-26.
20.
Fromkin, H. and S. Streufert (1976) "Laboratory experimentation," pp. 415-465 in M. D. Dunnette (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
21.
Gordon, M., L. Slade, and N. Schmitt (1986) "The 'science of the sophomore' revisited: from conjecture to empiricism." Academy of Management Rev.11: 191-207.
22.
Greenberg, J. (1987) "The college sophomore as guinea pig: setting the record straight." Academy of Management Rev.12: 157-159.
23.
Greene, J. and C. McClintock (1985) "Triangulation in evaluation." Evaluation Rev.9: 523-545.
24.
Heckman, J., V. Hotz, and M. Dabos (1987) "Do we need experimental data to evaluate the impact of manpower training on earnings?" Evaluation Rev.11: 395-427.
25.
Jick, T.D. (1983) "Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action," in J. Van Maanen (ed.) Qualitative Methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
L R. and R. Maynard (1987) "How precise are evaluations of employment and training programsEvidence from a field experiment." ? Evaluation Rev.11: 428-451.
27.
Landsbergen, D. and B. Bozeman (1987) "Credibility logic and policy analysis: is there rationality without science?" Knowledge8: 625-648.
28.
Landsbergen, D., S. Loveless, D.H. Coursey, and R. Shangraw (1988) "The relationship between decision confidence, commitment, and intelligent advisory systems: an experimental study." Prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the Operations Research Society of America/Institute of Management Science (ORSA/TIMS), Denver, October 23-26.
29.
March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen (1976) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
30.
McGrath, J.E. (1982) "Dilemmatics: the study of research choices and dilemmas," pp. 69-102 in J. E. McGrath et al. (eds.) Judgment Calls in Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
McGrath J. E., J. Martin, and R.A. Kulka (1982) "Some quasi-rules for making judgment calls in research," pp. 103-118 in J. E. McGrath et al. (eds.) Judgment Calls in Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
Mook, D. (1983) "In defense of external invalidity." Amer. Psychologist38: 379-387.
33.
Moran, T. (1987) "Research and managerial strategies for integrating evaluation research into agency decision making." Evaluation Rev.11: 612-630.
34.
Pearson, K. (1937) The Grammar of Science. New York: Meridian.
35.
Popper, K. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
36.
Reichardt, C. and T. Cook (1979) "Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods," in T. Cook and C. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
Reynolds, K. and S. West (1988) "A multiplist strategy for strengthening nonequivalent control group designs." Evaluation Rev.11: 691-714.
38.
Trend, M. (1979) "On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative analyses: a case study," in T. Cook and C. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
Tunnell, G. (1977) "Three dimensions of naturalness: an expanded definition of field research." Psych. Bull.84: 426-437.
40.
Weiss, C.H. (1981) "Measuring the use of evaluation," in J. Ciarlo (ed.) Utilizing Evaluation: Concepts and Measurement Techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41.
Whitbeck, C. (1977) "Causation in medicine: the disease entity model ." Philosophy of Sci.44: 619-637.
