In this article a schematic model is developed to describe the processes, determinants, and
required elements of support for programmed implementation of innovations in
organizational settings. Implications for planning and managing programmed implementation are discussed. Integration of this model, or similar ones, into the normal practices
for knowledge creation and diffusion should result in improved utilization and thereby
improved return on investments made in innovation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berkowitz, L. and L.R. Daniels (1964) "Responsibility and dependence."J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology66: 427-436.
2.
Berman, P. (1980) "Thinking about programmed and adaptive implementation: matching strategies to situations," pp. 205-230 in H. Ingram and D. Mann (eds.) Why Policies Succeed or Fail.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Child, J. (1972) "Organization structure and strategies of control: a replication of the Aston Study."Admin. Sci. Q.17: 163-177.
4.
Davis, H.R. (1971) A Checklist for Change. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
5.
——— (1979) "Change: decisions and their implementation," in S. Feldman (ed.) The Administration of Mental Health Services.Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
6.
——— and S. Salasin (1975) "The utilization of evaluation," pp. 621-666 in E. Struening and M. Guttentag (eds.) Handbook of Evaluation Research, Vol. 1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Drucker, A.J. (1977) "Military research product utilization."J. of Technology Transfer2: 9-28.
8.
Dunsire, A. (1978) Implementation in a Bureaucracy. New York: St. Martin's Press.
9.
Dusek, E.R. (1981) "Toward better utilization of personnel and training research." Presidential Address, Division 19, 89th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
10.
Etzioni, A. (1969) "A basis for comparative analysis of complex organizations," pp. 59-76 in A. Etzioni (ed.) A Sociological Reader on Complex Organizations . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11.
Glaser, E.M. (1973) "Knowledge transfer and institutional change."Professional Psychology4: 434-444.
12.
Gray, T. (1982) "A model of implementation."J. of Technology Transfer.
13.
——— (1981) "Implementing innovations: a systems approach to integrating what is known."J. of Technology Transfer 6: 19-32.
14.
——— and C. Roberts-Gray (1979) "Structuring bureaucratic rules to enhance compliance."Psych. Reports45: 579-589.
15.
——— and W.D. Gray (1982) "A guide to implementation of training products." U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences Technical Report
16.
Gray, T., J.J. Nichols, C. Roberts-Gray, T. Ritenour, and H.A. Griesemer (1983) MILES integration support analysis Phase I: A look at Army training 1982. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences Technical Report.
17.
Gross, N., J.B. Giacquinta, and M. Bernstein (1971) Implementing Organizational Innovations: A Sociological Analysis of Planned Educational ChangeNew York: Basic Books.
18.
Havelock, R.G. (1982) "Helping at the back end of the change process."Journal of Technology Transfer.
19.
——— (1971) Planning for Innovation. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
20.
Leithwood, K.A. (1981) "Managing the implementation of curriculum innovations."Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization2: 341-360.
21.
Lewin, K. (1947) "Frontiers in group dynamics."Human Relations1: 5-41.
22.
Lin N. and G. Zaltman (1973) "On the nature of innovations," in G. Zaltman (ed.) Processes and Phenomena of Social Change.New York: John Wiley.
23.
Lippitt, G.L. (1973) Visualizing ChangesLa Jolla, CA: University Associates.
24.
Nadler, G. (1979) "A systems engineering approach to securing real-world changes: a timeline perspective."J. of Applied Systems Analysis6: 89-100.
25.
——— (1980) "A timeline theory of planning and design."Design Studies1, 5.
26.
Regan, D.T. (1971) "Effects of a favor and liking on compliance."J. of Experimental Social Psychology7: 627-639.
27.
ROBERTS-GRAY, C. [ed.] (1982) On Closing the Implementation Gap: Symposium Proceedings. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences Technical Report.
28.
——— T. Gray, and W. Gray (1982) "Implementing training programs in the Army: a model to guide planning and evaluation."Presented at the meeting of the Evaluation Research Society, Baltimore, Maryland.
29.
Rogers, E.M. and F.F. Shoemaker (1971) Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach. New York: Free Press
30.
SANDS, F. F. and B.M. GLASER [eds.] (1978) "Proceedings of the 1977 National Symposium of Military Services on Utilization of People-related Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E)."Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, SE 78-3, N00 123-76-C-0174.
31.
Scheirer, M.A. (1981) Program Implementation: The Organizational ContextBeverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
Scott, T.D. (1980) "Tactical training for ground combat forces."Armed Forces and Society6: 215-231.
33.
Shields, J.L. (1976) "Training Technology-T3."Proceedings of the 15th Annual U.S. Army Operations Research Symposium, Vol. 2.
34.
Stone, C.N. (1980) "The implementation of social programs: two perspectives."J. of Social Issues36: 13-33.
35.
Warren D.I. (1968) "Power, visibility, and conformity in formal organizations."Amer. Soc. Rev. 33: 951-970.
36.
Weber, M. (1968) Economy and Society. New York : Bedminster.
37.
Yin, R.K. (1978) Changing Urban Bureaucracies: How New Practices Become Routinized. Rand Corporation Final Report to National Science Foundation, R-2277-NSF
38.
Zaltman, G. and R. Duncan ( 1977) Strategies for Planned ChangeNew York: John Wiley.
