The current research observed historical public discourse surrounding the issue of open science given its contemporary salience across scientific disciplines. The Twitter API was used to collect the population of 1,723,169 open science-related tweets published from Twitter’s inception through September 2022. A latent factor Dirichlet multinomial mixture (LF-DMM) model was used to analyze textual tweet content. Stepwise segmented compositional regression identified evolutionary trends and revolutionary shifts in the discourse over time. Seven themes emerged, and results demonstrated nuanced trajectories in the representation and prevalence of themes occurring in public discourse about open science over time.
AllenC.MehlerD. M. A. (2019). Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond. PLOS Biology, 17(5), Article e3000246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246
2.
BrittB. C. (2015). Stepwise segmented regression analysis: An iterative statistical algorithm to detect and quantify evolutionary and revolutionary transformations in longitudinal data. In MateiS. A.RussellM. G.BertinoE. (Eds.), Transparency in social media: Tools, methods, and algorithms for mediating online interactions (pp. 125–144). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18552-1
BrittB. C.BrittR. K. (2021). From waifus to whales: The evolution of discourse in a mobile game-based competitive community of practice. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920934509
6.
BrittR. K.BrittB. C.PanekE. T.LeeJ. (2023). Communication expressed on the COVID-19 subreddit in the midst of a global pandemic. Health Communication, 38(6), 1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1994190
7.
BahlaiC. A.BartlettL. J.BurgioK. R.FournierA. M. V.KeiserC. N.PoisotT.WhitneyK. S. (2019). Open science isn’t always open to all scientists: Current efforts to make research more accessible and transparent can reinforce inequality within STEM professions. American Scientist, 107(2), 78–82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26586147
8.
BertramM. G.SundinJ.RocheD. G.Sanchez-TojarA.ThoreE. S. J.BrodinT. (2023). Open science. Current Biology, 33(15), PR792–R797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.05.036
FecherB.FriesikeS. (2014). Open science: One term, five schools of thought. In BartlingS.FriesikeS. (Eds.), Opening science: The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing (pp. 17–48). Springer.
HeathR. L.PalencharM. J. (2009). Strategic issues management: Organizations and public policy changes (2nd ed.). Sage.
16.
HumphreysL.LewisN. A.JrSenderK.WonA. S. (2021). Integrating qualitative methods and open science: Five principles for more trustworthy research. Journal of Communication, 71(5), 855–874. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab026
17.
JahngM. R.LeeN. (2018). When scientists tweet for social changes: Dialogic communication and collective mobilization strategies by Flint water study scientists on Twitter. Science Communication, 40(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017751948
18.
KentM. L.TaylorM.VeilS. R. (2011). Issues management makeover: A facelift for an aging theory. In GoralskiM.LeBlanc IIIH. P.AdamsM. L. (Eds.), Business research yearbook: Balancing profitability and sustainability: Shaping the future of business (Vol. 18, pp. 534–541). International Academy of Business Disciplines.
VanDykeM. S.BrittB. C.BrittR. K.FrancoC. L. (2023). How environment-focused communities discuss COVID-19 online: An analysis of social (risk) amplification and ripple effects on Reddit. Environmental Communication, 17(3), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2056222
26.
VanDykeM. S.LeeN. M. (2020). Science public relations: The parallel, interwoven, and contrasting trajectories of public relations and science communication theory and practice. Public Relations Review, 46(4), 101953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101953
