Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We investigated how news articles discussing unequal impacts of climate change due to race versus class influence beliefs and support for action. We conducted two online survey experiments focusing on flooding (Study 1) and heat waves (Study 2). In Study 1, White participants and those with high levels of symbolic racism had lower levels of belief and support when exposed to the race-focused condition, although these interactions were not as consistent in Study 2. Results suggest that focusing on class-based climate disparities may be less susceptible to backfire effects than focusing on race-based disparities.

Keywords

climate change symbolic racism climate justice quantitative methodology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American National Election Studies. (2021). ANES 2020 time series study full release [dataset and documentation] (Version February 10, 2022) [Dataset]. www.electionstudies.org

Benegal

S. D.

(2018). The spillover of race and racial attitudes into public opinion about climate change. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 733–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1457287

Bergquist

Mildenberger

Stokes

L. C.

(2020). Combining climate, economic, and social policy builds public support for climate action in the US. Environmental Research Letters, 15(5), 054019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab81c1

Bugden

(2024). Environmental Inequality in the American Mind: The Problem of Color-Blind Environmental Racism. Social Problems, 71(1), 106–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spac005

Carman

J. P.

Ballew

Low

Verner

Rosenthal

S. A.

Barendregt-Ludwig

Torres

Gelobter

McKenney

Burga

Magaña

Amer

Williams

R. T.

Burgess

McRae

Larson

Salgado

Kioko

L. N.

. . .Leiserowitz

(2025). Americans’ support for climate justice. Environmental Science & Policy, 163, 103976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103976

Chanin

(2018). The effect of symbolic racism on environmental concern and environmental action. Environmental Sociology, 4(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1449340

Core Writing Team, Lee

Romero

(Eds.). (2023). IPCC, 2023: Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–34). IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf

Das

(2020). The struggle for climate justice: Three Indian news media coverage of climate change. Environmental Communication, 14(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1629976

Dietz

Duan

Nalley

Van Witsen

(2018). Social support for water quality: The influence of values and symbolic racism. Human Ecology Review, 24(1), 51–70.

10.

Dreher

Voyer

(2015). Climate refugees or migrants? Contesting media frames on climate justice in the pacific. Environmental Communication, 9(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.932818

11.

Feldman

Hart

P. S.

(2018). Is there any hope? How climate change news imagery and text influence audience emotions and support for climate mitigation policies. Risk Analysis, 38(3), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12868

12.

Feldman

Hart

P. S.

(2021). Upping the ante? The effects of “emergency” and “crisis” framing in climate change news. Climatic Change, 169(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03219-5

13.

Garrett

R. K.

(2017). Strategies for countering false information and beliefs about climate change. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.388

14.

Giner-Sorola . (2018, January 24). Powering your interaction. Approaching significance: A methodology blog for social psychology. https://approachingblog.wordpress.com/2018/01/24/powering-your-interaction-2/

15.

Hall

M. P.

Lewis

N. A.

Ellsworth

P. C.

(2018). Believing in climate change, but not behaving sustainably: Evidence from a one-year longitudinal study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.03.001

16.

Harell

Lieberman

(2021). How information about race-based health disparities affects policy preferences: Evidence from a survey experiment about the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 277, 113884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113884

17.

Hart

P. S.

Feldman

Choi

Zhang

A. L.

Hegland

(2023). The influence of flooding imagery and party cues on perceived threat, collective efficacy, and intentions for political action to address climate change. Science Communication, 45(5), 627–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231199972

18.

Hart

P. S.

Nisbet

E. C.

(2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211416646

19.

Henry

P. j.

Sears

D. O.

(2002). The Symbolic Racism 2000 Scale. Political Psychology, 23(2), 253–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00281

20.

Hornsey

M. J.

(2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x

21.

Lazarus

R. J.

(2008). Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153–1234.

22.

Lazri

A. M.

Konisky

D. M.

(2019). Environmental attitudes across race and ethnicity. Social Science Quarterly, 100(4), 1039–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12626

23.

Levin

Cashore

Bernstein

Auld

(2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0

24.

Liu

Niederdeppe

(2024). Effects of communicating health disparities using social comparison framing: A comprehensive review. Social Science & Medicine, 348, 116808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116808

25.

Lohmann

P. M.

Kontoleon

(2023). Do flood and heatwave experiences shape climate opinion? Causal evidence from flooding and heatwaves in England and Wales. Environmental and Resource Economics, 86(1), 263–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-023-00796-0

26.

Mackay

C. M. L.

Schmitt

M. T.

Lutz

A. E.

Mendel

(2021). Recent developments in the social identity approach to the psychology of climate change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.009

27.

Medina

DeRonda

Ross

Curtin

Jia

(2019). Revisiting environmental belief and behavior among ethnic groups in the U.S. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 629. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00629

28.

Nisbet

M. C.

(2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23.

29.

Pearson

A. R.

Favaro

Sparks

Schuldt

J. P.

(2024). Social psychological pathways to climate justice: Emerging insights and intersecting challenges. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 27(5), 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241242433

30.

Pearson

A. R.

Schuldt

J. P.

(2015). Bridging climate communication divides: Beyond the partisan gap. Science Communication, 37(6), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015611131

31.

Pearson

A. R.

Schuldt

J. P.

Romero-Canyas

Ballew

M. T.

Larson-Konar

(2018). Diverse segments of the US public underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(49), 12429–12434. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804698115

32.

Pew Research Center. (2024, February 29). Americans’ top policy priority for 2024: Strengthening the economy. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/02/29/americans-top-policy-priority-for-2024-strengthening-the-economy/

33.

Raimi

K. T.

Wolske

K. S.

Hart

P. S.

Choi

(2024). Exploring public perceptions of carbon capture and utilization in the U.S. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 50, 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.003

34.

Rigby

Soss

Booske

B. C.

Rohan

A. M. K.

Robert

S. A.

(2009). Public Responses to Health Disparities: How Group Cues Influence Support for Government Intervention. Social Science Quarterly, 90(5), 1321–1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00646.x

35.

Rode

J. B.

Dent

A. L.

Benedict

C. N.

Brosnahan

D. B.

Martinez

R. L.

Ditto

P. H.

(2021). Influencing climate change attitudes in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, 101623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101623

36.

Russell

Kangas

Kunelius

Painter

(2023). Niche climate news sites and the changing context of covering catastrophe. Journalism, 24(7), 1387–1405. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221113119

37.

Schlosberg

Collins

L. B.

(2014). From environmental to climate justice: Climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. Wires Climate Change, 5(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.275

38.

Schmidt

Schäfer

M. S.

(2015). Constructions of climate justice in German, Indian and US media. Climatic Change, 133(3), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1488-x

39.

Schmidt

Shaikh

S. J.

Sadecki

Buttenheim

Gollust

(2022). Public attitudes about equitable COVID-19 vaccine allocation: A randomised experiment of race-based versus novel place-based frames. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(12), 993–999. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108194

40.

Schuldt

J. P.

Pearson

A. R.

(2023). Public recognition of climate change inequities within the United States. Climatic Change, 176(8), 114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03594-1

41.

Sears

D. O.

Henry

P. J.

(2003). The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.259

42.

Sears

D. O.

Henry

P. J.

(2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 95–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37002-X

43.

Shanaah

Fritsche

Osmundsen

(2024). The effect of climate change threat on public attitudes towards ethnic and religious minorities and climate refugees. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 28(1), 67–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241262252

44.

Swim

J. K.

Bloodhart

(2018). The intergroup foundations of climate change justice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(3), 472–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217745366

45.

Thier

Lin

(2022). How solutions journalism shapes support for collective climate change adaptation. Environmental Communication, 16(8), 1027–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2143842

46.

Tsai

C. G.

Pearson

A. R.

(2022). Building diverse climate coalitions: The pitfalls and promise of equity- and identity-based messaging. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 8(4), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000336

47.

Uhl

Klackl

Hansen

Jonas

(2018). Undesirable effects of threatening climate change information: A cross-cultural study. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(3), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217735577

48.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Climate change and social vulnerability in the United States: A focus on six impacts (No. EPA 430-R-21-003; p. 101). https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-09/climate-vulnerability_september-2021_508.pdf

49.

Whitmarsh

Corner

(2017). Tools for a new climate conversation: A mixed-methods study of language for public engagement across the political spectrum. Global Environmental Change, 42, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.008

Unequal Risks,Unequal Responses: Differential Effects of Emphasizing Race Versus Class Disparities in News Stories About Climate Impacts

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References