Indigenous scientists represent a growing cohort of expert sources for news stories about environmental issues and policies, but the effects of these sources on support for conservation policy and stereotype perceptions of Indigenous peoples remain uncertain. In a 2 (Source: Tribal, State) × 2 (Emphasis: Biodiversity, Culture) between-subjects experimental survey (n = 624), we found that the inclusion of tribal wildlife biologists as sources in environmental news increased overall public perceptions of Indigenous competence. We also found frames emphasizing the cultural values of conservation resulted in greater support for conservation policy than emphasizing the importance of biodiversity regardless of source.
BeckersK.Van AelstP. (2019). Look who’s talking: An analysis of actors in television news (2003–2016). Journalism Studies, 20(6), 872–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1463169
3.
BerkowitzD. (1992). Who sets the media agenda? The ability of policymakers to determine news decisions. In KennamerJ. D. (Ed.), Public opinion, the press, and public policy (pp. 81–102). Praeger.
4.
BerkowitzD. (2009). Reporters and their sources. In Wahl-JorgensenK.HanitzschT. (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 102–115). Routledge.
5.
BesleyJ. C.DudoA. (2022). Strategic science communication: A guide to setting the right objectives for more effective public engagement. Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
BockM. A. (2011). You really, truly, have to “be there”: Video journalism as a social and material construction. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(4), 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800402
7.
BurkleyE.DuranteF.FiskeS. T.BurkleyM.AndradeA. (2017). Structure and content of Native American stereotypic subgroups: Not just (ig)noble. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000100
8.
CarlsonM. (2009). Dueling, dancing, or dominating? Journalists and their sources: Journalists and their sources. Sociology Compass, 3(4), 526–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00219.x
9.
CarstarphenM. G.SanchezJ. P. (Eds.). (2012). American Indians and the mass media. University of Oklahoma Press.
10.
ChenS. (2019). How to discredit a social movement: Negative framing of “Idle No More” in Canadian Print Media. Environmental Communication, 13(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1546201
11.
ColemanC.-L. (2020). Environmental clashes on Native American land: Framing environmental and scientific disputes. Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
ComfortR. N. (2022a). Challenging the nation-state: Indigenous nations in science and environmental communication. In TakahashiB.MetagJ.ThakerJ.Evans ComfortS. (Eds.), The handbook of international trends in environmental communication (pp. 232–247). Routledge.
13.
ComfortR. N. (2022b). Political macroenvironments & cultural information protection: The challenge of communication in Native American environmental and natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 35(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2022.2113846
14.
ConradP. (1999). Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science, 8(4), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/8/4/302
15.
ConwayM.Elizabeth GrabeM.GrievesK. (2007). Villians, victims and the virtuous in Bill O’Reilly’s “No-spin Zone”: Revisiting world war propaganda techniques. Journalism Studies, 8(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700601148820
16.
CowardJ. M. (1999). The newspaper Indian: Native American identity in the press, 1820-90. University of Illinois Press.
17.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS Map. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–149). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
18.
DavidsonT.MillerN. P.DayB. (2023). Primitive or empowered: Representations of Native Americans and COVID-19 in news media. Communication Quarterly, 71(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2105654
19.
DeloriaP. J. (2007). Playing Indian (Nachdr.). Yale University Press.
20.
DixonT. L. (2019). Media stereotypes: Content, effects, and theory. In OliverM. B.RaneyA. A.BryantJ. (Eds.), Media effects (4th ed., pp. 243–257). Routledge.
21.
DunawayF. (2008). Gas masks, pogo, and the ecological Indian: Earth day and the visual politics of American environmentalism. American Quarterly, 60(1), 67–99.
22.
ErhartR. S.HallD. L. (2019). A descriptive and comparative analysis of the content of stereotypes about Native Americans. Race and Social Problems, 11(3), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-019-09264-1
23.
FiskeS. T. (2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738825
24.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
25.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
26.
FiskeS. T.DupreeC. (2014). Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(supplement_4), 13593–13597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317505111
27.
GanjeL. A. (2003). Native American stereotypes. In LesterP. M.RossS. D. (Eds.), Images that injure: Pictorial stereotypes in the media (2nd ed., pp. 113–120). Praeger.
28.
GeigerN.SargeM. A.ComfortR. N. (2022). An examination of expertise, caring and salient value similarity as source factors that garner support for advocated climate policies. Environmental Communication, 16(6), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2080242
29.
GoodmanM. K.McNattM. B.BoykoffM. T. (2022). Communicating climate change in the Anthropocene. In HansenA.CoxR. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (2nd ed., pp. 253–271). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003119234-20
30.
HookerC.LeaskJ. (2020). Risk communication should be explicit about values. A perspective on early communication during COVID-19. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 17(4), 581–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10057-0
KopaczM.Lee LawtonB. (2011). The YouTube Indian: Portrayals of Native Americans on a viral video site. New Media & Society, 13(2), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810373532
33.
KrauseN. M.BrossardD.ScheufeleD. A.XenosM. A.FrankeK. (2019). Trends—Americans’ trust in science and scientists. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(4), 817–836. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz041
34.
KrechS. (2000). The ecological Indian: Myth and history. W. W. Norton.
35.
KroonA. C.TrillingD.RaatsT. (2021). Guilty by association: Using word embeddings to measure ethnic stereotypes in news coverage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(2), 451–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020932304
36.
LaPoeB. R.IILaPoeV. (2018). Online momentum: Priming in the Native American press. In LaPoeV.Carter OlsonC. S.LaPoeB. R. (Eds.), Underserved communities and digital discourse: Getting voices heard (pp. 171–184). Lexington Books.
37.
LaPoeV.LaPoeB. R. (2017). Indian country: Telling a story in a digital age. Michigan State University Press.
38.
LeeT. L.FiskeS. T. (2006). Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the stereotype content model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.005
39.
LoewP.MellaK. (2005). Black ink and the new red power: Native American newspapers and tribal sovereignty. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 7(3), 99–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/152263790500700301
40.
MastroD. (2009). Effects of racial and ethnic stereotyping. In BryantJ.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 325–341). Routledge.
41.
MillerA.RossS. D. (2004). They are not us: Framing of American Indians by the Boston Globe. Howard Journal of Communications, 15(4), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170490521716
42.
MooreE. E. (2019). Journalism, politics, and the Dakota Access Pipeline: Standing Rock and the framing of injustice. Routledge.
43.
MooreE. E.LanthornK. R. (2017). Framing disaster: News media coverage of two Native American environmental justice cases. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 41(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859917706348
National Congress of American Indians. (2019). Becoming visible: A landscape analysis of state efforts to provide Native American education for all.
46.
O’KeefeD. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
47.
OrrR.SharrattK.IqbalM. (2019). American Indian erasure and the logic of elimination: An experimental study of depiction and support for resources and rights for tribes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(11), 2078–2099. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1421061
48.
OrrR.SharrattK.IqbalM. (2022). Stereotypes and judgments about American Indian peoples: Results from an experimental study. Journal of Indigenous Research, 20(2022), Article 9.
49.
ReynaC.DobriaO.WetherellG. (2013). The complexity and ambivalence of immigration attitudes: Ambivalent stereotypes predict conflicting attitudes toward immigration policies. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19(3), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032942
50.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
51.
WestonM. A. (1996). Native Americans in the news: Images of Indians in the twentieth century press. Greenwood Press.
52.
ZahryN. R.BesleyJ. C. (2021). Can scientists communicate interpersonal warmth? Testing warmth messages in the context of science communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 49(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2021.1880017
