We worked with low-income participants in interactive, storytelling-based community workshops to discuss results from a scientific project related to harmful algal blooms. We used two story-based workshop formats—a science-fiction story and a personal-research-account story. In this Research Note, we reflect on two main topics: a comparison between the two story-based approaches and work with marginalized participants. With our reflections, our aim is to help inform future efforts that wish to incorporate science fiction approaches and/or work with marginalized populations in science communication.
AdeyemiI.SandersC.OngB. N.HowellsK.QuinlivanL.GormanL.GilesS.AmpM.MonaghanE.NaseemS.PearsonA.Cheraghi-SohiS. (2022). Challenges and adaptations to public involvement with marginalised groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: Commentary with illustrative case studies in the context of patient safety research. Research Involvement and Engagement, 8, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00345-x
2.
BallardJ.BelskyM. (2010). Participatory action research and environmental learning: Implications for resilient forests and communities. Environmental Education Research, 16, 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505440
3.
BarrableA.BoothD. (2020). Increasing nature connection in children: A mini review of interventions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 492.
BennettN. J.RothR.KlainS. C.ChanK. M. A.ClarkD. A.CullmanG.EpsteinG.NelsonM. P.StedmanR.TeelT. L.ThomasR. E. W.WybornC.CurranD.GreenbergA.SandlosJ.VeríssimoD. (2017). Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conservation Biology, 31, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12788
6.
BickfordD.PosaM. R. C.QieL.Campos-ArceizA.KudavidanageE. P. (2012). Science communication for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 151, 74–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.016
7.
BonneyR.PhillipsT. B.BallardH. L.EnckJ. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?Public Understanding of Science, 25, 2–16.
8.
BrakeM.ThorntonR. (2003). Science fiction in the classroom. Physics education, 38(1), 31.
9.
Bruine de BruinW.BostromA. (2013). Assessing what to address in science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 14062–14068. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212729110
10.
ByerlyH.BalmfordA.FerraroP. J.Hammond WagnerC.PalchakE.PolaskyS.RickettsT. H.SchwartzA. J.FisherB. (2018). Nudging pro-environmental behavior: Evidence and opportunities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1777
11.
CanfieldK. N.MenezesS.MatsudaS. B.MooreA.Mosley AustinA. N.DewsburyB. M.Feliú-MójerM. I.McDuffieK. W. B.MooreK.ReichC. A.SmithH. M.TaylorC. (2020). Science communication demands a critical approach that centers inclusion, equity, and intersectionality. Frontiers in Communication, 5, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00002
12.
Carter-BlackJ. (2007). Teaching cultural competence: An innovative strategy grounded in the universality of storytelling as depicted in African and African American storytelling traditions. Journal of Social Work Education, 43, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2007.200400471
13.
ConeJ. (2008). Hold that Thought: Questioning Five Common Assumptions about Communicating with the Public. Oregon State University, Oregon Sea Grant.
14.
Costanza-ChockS. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press.
15.
DahlstromM. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 13614–13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111
16.
DietzT. (2013). Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 14081–14087. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212740110
17.
DunneA.RabyF. (2001). Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects. Springer Science & Business Media.
18.
DunneA.RabyF. (2013). Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press.
19.
ErvesJ. C.Mayo-GambleT. L.Malin-FairA.BoyerA.JoostenY.VaughnY.SherdenL.LutherP.MillerS.WilkinsC. H. (2017). Needs, priorities, and recommendations for engaging underrepresented populations in clinical research: A community perspective. Journal of Community Health, 42, 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0279-2
20.
FritscheI.BarthM.JugertP.MassonT.ReeseG. (2018). A Social Identity Model of Pro-Environmental Action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review, 125:, 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000090
GlaserM.GarsoffkyB.SchwanS. (2009). Narrative-based learning: Possible benefits and problems. Communications, 34, 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.026
23.
GouldR. K. (2023). How creativity can help research on the multiple values of nature become more innovative and inclusive. People and Nature, 5, 244–257.
24.
GouldR. K.ArdoinN. M.HashimotoJ. K. (2010). ‘Mālama the ‘āina, Mālama the people on the ‘āina’: The reaction to avatar in Hawai‘i. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 4, 425–456.
25.
GreenS. J.Grorud-ColvertK.MannixH. (2018). Uniting science and stories: Perspectives on the value of storytelling for communicating science. Edited by Marie-Claire Shanahan. FACETS, 3, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0079
26.
HamptonG. J. (2010). Changing bodies in the fiction of Octavia Butler: Slaves, aliens, and vampires. Lexington Books.
27.
HarcourtR.Bruine de BruinW.DessaiS.TaylorA. (2021). Envisioning climate change adaptation futures using storytelling workshops. Sustainability, 13, Article 6630. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126630
28.
IsekeJ. (2013). Indigenous storytelling as research. International Review of Qualitative Research, 6, 559–577.
29.
JiménezA.LeDeunffH.GinéR.SjödinJ.CronkR.MuradS.TakaneM.BartramJ. (2019). The enabling environment for participation in water and sanitation: A conceptual framework. Water, 11, Article 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020308
30.
KimmererR. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.
31.
KingT. (2003). The truth about stories: A native narrative. House of Anansi.
32.
KochN. (2020). Deep listening: Practicing intellectual humility in geographic fieldwork. Geographical Review, 110, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12334
33.
KotechaM. C.ChenT.McAdamsD. A.KrishnamurthyV. (2021). Design ideation through speculative fiction: Foundational principles and exploratory study. Journal of Mechanical Design, 143(8), 080801.
34.
KuehneL. M.TwardochlebL. A.FritschieK. J.MimsM. C.LawrenceD. J.GibsonP. P.Stewart-KosterB.OldenJ. D. (2014). Practical science communication strategies for graduate students: Graduate student science communication. Conservation Biology, 28, 1225–1235. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12305
35.
KuzwayoE. (1990). Sit down and listen. David Philip Africa South New Writing.
36.
LevineJ. K.ChanM. A.SatterfieldT. (2015). From rational actor to efficient complexity manager: Exorcising the ghost of Homo economicus with a unified synthesis of cognition research. Ecological Economics, 114, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.010
McCurdyH. E. (1995). Fiction and imagination: How they affect public administration. Public Administration Review, 55, 499. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110340
40.
NeeleyL.BarkerE.BayerS. R.MaktoufiR.WuK. J.ZaringhalamM. (2020). Linking scholarship and practice: Narrative and identity in science. Frontiers in Communication, 5, Article 119. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00035
41.
NegreteA. (2005). Facts via fiction: stories that communicate science. In SanittN. (ed.), Motivating science: Science communication from a philosophical, educational and cultural perspective (pp. 95–102). Pantaneto Press.
42.
NegreteA.LartigueC. (2010). The science of telling stories: Evaluating science communication via narratives (RIRC method). Journal Media and Communication Studies, 2(4), 98–110.
43.
NisbetD.ScheufeleA. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96:, 1767–1778. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041
44.
NoelL.-A. (2022). Dreaming outside the boxes that hold me in: Speculation and design thinking as tools for hope and liberation against oppression. Journal of Futures Studies, 26:, 71–82.
45.
OlsonR. (2015). Houston, we have a narrative. University of Chicago Press.
46.
PandyaR. E. (2012). A framework for engaging diverse communities in citizen science in the U.S. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 285–290.
47.
PhadkeR.ManningC.BurlagerS. (2015). Making it personal: Diversity and deliberation in climate adaptation planning. Climate Risk Management, 9, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2015.06.005
48.
PolkS.DiverE. (2020). Situating the scientist: Creating inclusive science communication through equity framing and environmental justice. Frontiers in Communication, 5, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00006
49.
PopperA. (2015). Transforming business through science fiction prototyping. Computer, 48(01), 70–72.
50.
SchuslerT. M.DeckerD. J.PfefferM. J. (2003). Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920390178874
51.
ShirkJ. L.BallardH. L.WildermanC. C.PhillipsT.WigginsA.JordanR.McCallieE.MinarchekM.LewensteinB. V.KrasnyM. E.BonneyR. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17, 29.
52.
SilkoL. M. (2012). Storyteller. Penguin Books.
53.
StaddonS.BygA.ChapmanM.FishR.HagueA.HorganK. (2023). The value of listening and listening for values in conservation. People and Nature, 5, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10232
54.
Stanford d. school. (2020). Getting started with design thinking.
55.
StedmanR. C.ConnellyN. A.HeberleinT. A.DeckerD. J.AllredS. B. (2019). The end of the (research) world as we know it? Understanding and coping with declining response rates to mail surveys. Society & Natural Resources, 32, 1139–1154.
56.
UlibarriN.CravensA. E.NabergojA. S.KernbachS.RoyaltyA. (2019). Creativity in research. Cambridge University Press.
57.
VelandS.Scoville-SimondsM.Gram-HanssenI.SchorreA.El KhouryA.NordbøM.LynchA.HochachkaG.BjørkanM. (2018). Narrative matters for sustainability: The transformative role of storytelling in realizing 1.5°C futures. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.005
58.
WibeckV. (2014). Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change—Some lessons from recent literature. Environmental Education Research, 20, 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.812720
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
