A well-functioning natural environment benefits individuals’ well-being, but people tend to overlook this personally relevant benefit because they feel remote from the environment (also known as psychological distance). Drawing on the construal level theory, we proposed environmental information engagement as a way to mitigate psychological distance. We assert that prolonged exposure to and interaction with environmental information decreases the abstractness of environmental issues thereby lowering psychological distance. Cross-lagged analyses using data from a national longitudinal survey in China (N = 2,322) verified this effect both instantly and over time. However, the effect was not detected in people with weak environmental values. Theoretical and practical implications are provided.
AkerlofK.MaibachE. W.FitzgeraldD.CedenoA. Y.NeumanA. (2013). Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter?Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006
2.
AmelungD.FischerH.HerrmannA.AallC.LouisV. R.BecherH.WilkinsonP.SauerbornR. (2019). Human health as a motivator for climate change mitigation: Results from four European high-income countries. Global Environmental Change, 57, 101918.
3.
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 60(2), 241–253.
4.
BallewM. T.MarlonJ. R.GoldbergM. H.MaibachE. W.RosenthalS. A.AikenE.LeiserowitzA. (2022). Changing minds about global warming: Vicarious experience predicts self-reported opinion change in the USA. Climatic Change, 173(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03397-w
5.
BarthM.MassonT.FritscheI.FieldingK.SmithJ. R. (2021). Collective responses to global challenges: The social psychology of pro-environmental action. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101562
6.
BirchS. (2020). Political polarization and environmental attitudes: A cross-national analysis. Environmental Politics, 29(4), 697–718.
7.
BoumanT.VerschoorM.AlbersC. J.BöhmG.FisherS. D.PoortingaW.WhitmarshL.StegL. (2020). When worry about climate change leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Global Environmental Change, 62, 102061.
8.
BrewerP. R.LeyB. L. (2013). Whose science do you believe? Explaining trust in sources of scientific information about the environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137.
9.
BrickC.BosshardA.WhitmarshL. (2021). Motivation and climate change: A review. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 82–88.
10.
CapaldiC. A.DopkoR. L.ZelenskiJ. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976
11.
CasasF.CoendersG.GonzálezM.MaloS.BertranI.FiguerC. (2012). Testing the relationship between parents’ and their children’s subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(6), 1031–1051.
12.
ClaytonS. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In ClaytonS.OpotowS. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment (pp. 45–65). MIT Press.
13.
CorbettJ. B.DurfeeJ. L. (2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547004270234
14.
CreutzigF.NiamirL.BaiX.CallaghanM.CullenJ.Díaz-JoséJ.FigueroaM.GrublerA.LambW. F.LeipA. (2022). Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of well-being. Nature Climate Change, 12(1), 36–46.
15.
DaiJ.KesternichM.LöschelA.ZieglerA. (2015). Extreme weather experiences and climate change beliefs in China: An econometric analysis. Ecological Economics, 116, 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.05.001
16.
DeciE. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 18(1), 105–115.
17.
DemskiC.CapstickS.PidgeonN.SposatoR. G.SpenceA. (2017). Experience of extreme weather affects climate change mitigation and adaptation responses. Climatic Change, 140(2), 149–164.
18.
DengJ.WalkerG. J.SwinnertonG. (2006). A comparison of environmental values and attitudes between Chinese in Canada and Anglo-Canadians. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 22–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505278458
19.
DohertyT. J.ClaytonS. (2011). The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023141
20.
DonnerS. D.McDanielsJ. (2013). The influence of national temperature fluctuations on opinions about climate change in the U.S. since 1990. Climatic Change, 118(3), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0690-3
21.
DruckmanJ. N.McGrathM. C. (2019). The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 111–119.
22.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
23.
ErdelezS. (2005). Information encountering. In FisherK. E.ErdelezS.McKechnieE. (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 179–184). Information Today.
24.
FankhauserS.SmithS. M.AllenM.AxelssonK.HaleT.HepburnC.KendallJ. M.KhoslaR.LezaunJ.Mitchell-LarsonE. (2022). The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. Nature Climate Change, 12(1), 15–21.
25.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.
26.
FieldingK. S.HornseyM. J. (2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121
27.
GalpertiS. (2019). Persuasion: The art of changing worldviews. American Economic Review, 109(3), 996–1031.
28.
GiffordR.NilssonA. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157.
29.
GoldbergM. H.van der LindenS.MaibachE.LeiserowitzA. (2019). Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(30), 14804–14805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906589116
30.
GreeneJ. A.CopelandD. Z.DeekensV. M. (2021). A model of technology incidental learning effects. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 883–913.
31.
HeinströmJ. (2006). Psychological factors behind incidental information acquisition. Library & Information Science Research, 28(4), 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2006.03.022
32.
HennessyM.HawkinsL.JamiesonK. H. (2017). The 2014 walrus haul out: A case study of selective exposure to environmental news coverage. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 63–74.
33.
HoweP. D.BoudetH.LeiserowitzA.MaibachE. W. (2014). Mapping the shadow of experience of extreme weather events. Climatic Change, 127(2), 381–389.
34.
HowellR. A. (2011). Lights, camera . . . action? Altered attitudes and behaviour in response to the climate change filmThe Age of Stupid. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 177–187.
35.
HowellR. A. (2014). Investigating the long-term impacts of climate change communications on individuals’ attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 70–101.
36.
HungL.-S.BayrakM. M. (2019). Wives influence climate change mitigation behaviours in married-couple households: Insights from Taiwan. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 124034.
37.
JaxK.CalestaniM.ChanK. M. A.EserU.KeuneH.MuracaB.O’BrienL.PotthastT.Voget-KleschinL.WittmerH. (2018). Caring for nature matters: A relational approach for understanding nature’s contributions to human well-being. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009
38.
KenrickD. T.GriskeviciusV.NeubergS. L.SchallerM. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 292–314.
39.
KoniskyD. M.HughesL.KaylorC. H. (2016). Extreme weather events and climate change concern. Climatic Change, 134(4), 533–547.
40.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.
41.
LacasseK. (2016). Don’t be satisfied, identify! Strengthening positive spillover by connecting pro-environmental behaviors to an “environmentalist” label. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.006
42.
LawsonD. F.StevensonK. T.PetersonM. N.CarrierS. J. L.StrnadR.SeekampE. (2019). Children can foster climate change concern among their parents. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 458–462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0463-3
LibermanN.TropeY. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201–1205.
46.
LindenS. V.LeiserowitzA.MaibachE. (2018). Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0259-2
47.
LindsayP. H.NormanD. A. (2013). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. Academic Press.
48.
LiuS.HouQ.GuoL. (2018). Based on environmental experience to discuss the effect of environmental education on environmental value. Ekoloji, 27(106), 991–997.
49.
LorenzoniI.Nicholson-ColeS.WhitmarshL. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 445–459.
50.
LoyL. S.SpenceA. (2020). Reducing, and bridging, the psychological distance of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101388
51.
MarxS. M.WeberE. U.OrloveB. S.LeiserowitzA.KrantzD. H.RoncoliC.PhillipsJ. (2007). Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environmental Change, 17(1), 47–58.
52.
McDonaldR. I.ChaiH. Y.NewellB. R. (2015). Personal experience and the “psychological distance” of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 109–118.
MyersT. A.MaibachE. W.PlackyB. W.HenryK. L.SlaterM. D.SeitterK. L. (2020). Impact of the climate matters program on public understanding of climate change. Weather, Climate, and Society, 12(4), 863–876. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-20-0026.1
55.
MyersT. A.MaibachE. W.Roser-RenoufC.AkerlofK.LeiserowitzA. A. (2013). The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 343–347.
56.
NetuveliG.WattsP. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviours and attitudes are associated with health, wellbeing and life satisfaction in multiple occupancy households in the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Population and Environment, 41(3), 347–371.
57.
NolanJ. M. (2010). “An inconvenient truth” increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. Environment and Behavior, 42(5), 643–658.
58.
O’KeeffeG. S.Clarke-PearsonK.CouncilC., & Media. (2011). Clinical report—The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800–804. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0054
59.
OttoS.EvansG. W.MoonM. J.KaiserF. G. (2019). The development of children’s environmental attitude and behavior. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101947
60.
PalmR.LewisG. B.FengB. (2017). What causes people to change their opinion about climate change?Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(4), 883–896.
61.
PettigrewK. E. (1999). Waiting for chiropody: Contextual results from an ethnographic study of the information behaviour among attendees at community clinics. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 801–817.
RamkissoonH. R.SmithL. D. G. (2014). The relationship between environmental worldviews, emotions and personal efficacy in climate change. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7(1), 93–109.
64.
RhodesN.TooleJ.ArpanL. M. (2016). Persuasion as reinforcement: Strengthening the pro-environmental attitude-behavior relationship through ecotainment programming. Media Psychology, 19(3), 455–478.
65.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
66.
RudmanL. A.McLeanM. C.BunzlM. (2013). When truth is personally inconvenient, attitudes change: The impact of extreme weather on implicit support for green politicians and explicit climate-change beliefs. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2290–2296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613492775
67.
RutherfordA. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56, 185.
68.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
69.
SavolainenR. (2019). Modeling the interplay of information seeking and information sharing: A conceptual analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(4), 518–534.
70.
ShreedharG.MouratoS. (2020). Linking human destruction of nature to COVID-19 increases support for wildlife conservation policies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76, 963–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00444-x
71.
SimisM. J.MaddenH.CacciatoreM. A.YeoS. K. (2016). The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 400–414.
72.
SonnenwaldD. H. (2006). Challenges in sharing information effectively: Examples from command and control. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 11(4), n4.
73.
SpenceA.PoortingaW.ButlerC.PidgeonN. F. (2011). Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change, 1(1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059
StegL.VlekC. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317.
76.
TaylorA.de BruinW. B.DessaiS. (2014). Climate change beliefs and perceptions of weather-related changes in the United Kingdom. Risk Analysis, 34(11), 1995–2004.
77.
TianJ.SunM.GongY.ChenX.SunY. (2022). Chinese residents’ attitudes toward consumption-side climate policy: The role of climate change perception and environmental topic involvement. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 182, 106294.
78.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
79.
TrueloveH. B.CarricoA. R.WeberE. U.RaimiK. T.VandenberghM. P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127–138.
80.
TrueloveH. B.GillisA. J. (2018). Perception of pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, 49, 175–185.
81.
van der LindenS. (2017). Determinants and measurement of climate change risk perception, worry, and concern. In The Oxford encyclopedia of climate change communication. Oxford University Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2953631
82.
van der LindenS.MaibachE.LeiserowitzA. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 758–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615598516
83.
van RiperC. J.KyleG. T. (2014). Understanding the internal processes of behavioral engagement in a national park: A latent variable path analysis of the value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.002
84.
WangS.JiangJ.ZhouY.LiJ.ZhaoD.LinS. (2020). Climate-change information, health-risk perception and residents’ environmental complaint behavior: An empirical study in China. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 42(3), 719–732.
85.
WashingtonH. (2013). Human dependence on nature: How to help solve the environmental crisis. Routledge.
86.
WelschH.KühlingJ. (2018). How Green self image is related to subjective well-being: Pro-environmental values as a social norm. Ecological Economics, 149, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.002
87.
WilsonT. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49–56.
88.
WoodworthB. L.Steen-AdamsM. M.MittalP. (2011). Role of an environmental studies course on the formation of environmental worldviews: A case study of a core curriculum requirement using the NEP Scale. Journal of Environmental Studies Sciences, 1, 126–137.
89.
YadamsurenB.ErdelezS. (2016). Incidental exposure to online news. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1–8.
90.
ZavalL.KeenanE. A.JohnsonE. J.WeberE. U. (2014). How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nature Climate Change, 4(2), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2093
91.
ZawadzkiS. J.StegL.BoumanT. (2020). Meta-analytic evidence for a robust and positive association between individuals’ pro-environmental behaviors and their subjective wellbeing. Environmental Research Letters, 15(12), 123007.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
