The metaphor can serve as an effective tool in science communication. This article studies the posts and comments of the Weibo account of Jade Rabbit of the Moon Rover, which construes the rover metaphorically as an anthropomorphized rabbit. This study explores the motivation and effect of this metaphor. Conceptual motivation can be found in the similarities between the rover and the anthropomorphized rabbit. Communicative motivation lies in its enhanced effectiveness in promoting science. The metaphor has been readily accepted by Weibo users who have displayed emotional reactions to its metaphorical construal, acquired astronomical knowledge, and determined to embark on scientific careers.
ArmonR. (2017). Radio sensors and electric storms: Scientific metaphors in media talks. Science Communication, 39, 443–465.
2.
AtanasovaD. (2018). “Keep moving forward. LEFT RIGHT LEFT”: A critical metaphor analysis and addressivity analysis of personal and professional obesity blogs. Discourse, Context & Media, 25, 5–12.
3.
BoeynaemsA.BurgersC.KonijnE. A.SteenG. J. (2017). The effects of metaphorical framing on political persuasion: A systematic literature review. Metaphor and Symbol, 32, 118–134.
4.
BostanciA. (2010). A metaphor made in public. Science Communication, 32, 467–488.
5.
BultitudeK.SardoA. M. (2012). Leisure and pleasure: Science events in unusual locations. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 2775–2795.
6.
BurnsT. W.O’ConnorD. J.StocklmayerS. M. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12, 183–202.
7.
ChoP. K.-K. (2019). Myth, history, and metaphor in the Hebrew Bible. Cambridge University Press.
8.
DahlstromM. F. (2014.). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 13614–13620.
9.
DahlstromM. F.ShirleyS. H. (2012). Ethical considerations of using narrative to communicate science. Science Communication, 34, 592–617.
10.
DaviesS. R.HalpernM.HorstM.KirbyD. A.LewensteinB. (2019). Science stories as culture: Experience, identity, narrative and emotion in public communication of science. Journal of Science Communication, 18, 1–17.
11.
DonoghueD. (2014). Metaphor. Harvard University Press.
12.
DorstA. G. (2011). Personification in discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures and communicative functions. Language and Literature, 20, 113–135.
13.
DorstA. G.MulderG.SteenG. J. (2011). Recognition of personifications in fiction by non-expert readers. Metaphor and the Social World, 1, 174–200.
14.
DriskoJ. W.MaschiT. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
15.
FlintC. (1998). Speaking objects: The circulation of stories in eighteenth-century fiction. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 113, 212–226.
16.
ForcevilleC. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In Gibbs, Jr.R. W. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge University Press.
17.
GoatlyA. (2007). Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. John Benjamins.
18.
HawkesK. (2018). Metaphor. Routledge.
19.
JinL.CortazziM. (2019). Chinese cultures of learning: Elicited metaphor research. In HuangC.Jing-SchmidtZ.MeisterernstB. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese applied linguistics (pp. 131–148). Routledge.
20.
KirbyD. A. (2003). Scientists on the set: Science consultants and the communication of science in visual fiction. Public Understanding of Science, 12, 261–278.
21.
KövecsesZ. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.
22.
KövecsesZ. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
23.
KövecsesZ. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge University Press.
24.
KrippendorffK. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). SAGE.
25.
LakoffG. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 39–74.
26.
LakoffG. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In OrtonyA. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.
27.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
28.
LongE. (2009). Metaphor, personification and anthropomorphization in contemporary popular media representation of science [Doctoral dissertation]. Pacifica Graduate Institute.
29.
MackayD. G. (1986). Prototypicality among metaphors: On the relative frequency of personification and spatial metaphors in literature written for children versus adults. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1, 87–107.
30.
Martín-SempereM. J.Garzón-GarcíaB.Rey-RochaJ. (2008). Scientists’ motivation to communicate science and technology to the public: Surveying participants at the Madrid Science Fair. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 349–367.
31.
McEntee-AtalianisL. J. (2011). The role of metaphor in shaping the identity and agenda of the United Nations: The imagining of an international community and international threat. Discourse and Communication, 5, 393–412.
32.
MühlhäuslerP. (2012). Prologue. In IdströmA.PiirainenE. (Eds.), Endangered metaphors (pp. 1–14). John Benjamins.
33.
OttatiV.RenstromR.PriceE. (2014). The metaphoric framing model: Political communication and public opinion. In LandauM. J.RobinsonM. D.MeierB. P. (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 179–202). American Psychological Association.
34.
PascualE. (2014). Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse. John Benjamins.
35.
PascualE.OakleyT. (2017). Fictive interaction. In DancygierB. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 347–360). Cambridge University Press.
36.
PaxsonJ. (1994). The poetics of personification. Cambridge University Press.
37.
PinkerS. (2007). The stuff of thought. Penguin Books.
38.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 1–39.
39.
RitchieL. D. (2013). Metaphor. Cambridge University Press.
40.
ShuD. (2000). Yinyuxue yanjiu [Studies in metaphor]. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
41.
SperberD.WilsonD. (2008). A deflationary account of metaphors. In GibbsR. W.Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 84–108). Cambridge University Press.
42.
SteenG. J. (2011). What does “really deliberate” really mean? More thoughts on metaphor and consciousness. Metaphor and the Social World, 1, 53–56.
43.
SteenG. J. (2015). Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72.
44.
SteenG. J. (2017). Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14, 1–24.
45.
TendahlM. (2009). A hybrid theory of metaphor: Relevance theory and cognitive linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
TurnerM. (2014). The origin of ideas: Blending, creativity, and the human spark. Oxford University Press.
47.
VäliverronenE.HellstenI. (2002). From “burning library” to “green medicine”: The role of metaphors in communicating biodiversity. Science Communication, 24, 229–245.
48.
WilsonD.CarstonR. (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the “emergent property” issue. Mind and Language, 21, 404–433.
49.
ZhangY.LiZ.-X. (2017). Conceptual integration in the construction of the subject in communication: With special reference to the Weibo of rover rabbit. Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University, 6, 12–18.
