Applying the solution aversion model in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, we examine how ideology and support for free markets influence Americans’ assessment of COVID-19 risks and support for mitigation policies. Results from an experiment (N = 438) indicate that conservatives are more likely to dismiss the risks of COVID-19 when governmental regulations are highlighted. In contrast, liberals are less likely to support Emergency Use Authorization of COVID-19 vaccines when market-oriented solutions are highlighted. Findings from this study suggest that in addition to party elite cues, polarization in public opinions on the pandemic may also stem from solution aversion.
BacciniL.BrodeurA.WeymouthS. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election. Journal of Population Economics, 34, 739-767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00820-3
2.
BerinskyA. J.HuberG. A.LenzG. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
BolsenT.DruckmanJ. N.CookF. L. (2015). Citizens’, scientists’, and policy advisors’ beliefs about global warming. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 271-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214558393
5.
CalvilloD. P.RossB. J.GarciaR. J.SmelterT. J.RutchickA. M. (2020). Political ideology predicts perceptions of the threat of covid-19 (and susceptibility to fake news about it). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1119-1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620940539
6.
CampbellT. H.KayA. C. (2014). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 809-824. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037963
7.
CarraroL.CastelliL.MacchiellaC. (2011). The automatic conservative: Ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information. PLoS One, 6(11), e26456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026456
DyerO. (2020). Covid-19: Trump stokes protests against social distancing measures. BMJ, 369, m1596. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1596
10.
FauciA. S.LaneH. C.RedfieldR. R. (2020). Covid-19–navigating the uncharted. New England Journal of Medicine, 382, 1268-1269. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe2002387
11.
FreiraL.SartorioM.BoruchowiczC.BooF. L.NavajasJ. (2020). The irrational interplay between partisanship, beliefs about the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, and support for policy interventions. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4cgfw
12.
GonsalvesG.YameyG. (2020). Political interference in public health science during covid-19. BMJ, 371, m3878. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3878
13.
GreenJ.EdgertonJ.NaftelD.ShoubK.CranmerS. J. (2020). Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Advances, 6(28), eabc2717. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc2717
14.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
JostJ. T.BlountS.PfefferJ.HunyadyG. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25002-4
17.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
KushnerG. S.GoodmanS. W.PepinskyT. B. (2021). Health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One, 16(4), e0249596. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562796
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
