Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Whereas the positive impact of 360-degree video on user experience has been demonstrated, its persuasive potentials have not been fully investigated. A lab experiment compared proenvironmental 360-degree videos and unidirectional videos in their persuasive effectiveness. Environmental self-efficacy, the degree to which individuals believe that they can influence the outcomes associated with global warming, has been proposed as a moderator. In a lab experiment (N = 76), higher environmental self-efficacy participants perceived the same video content as more fun and credible while using the 360-degree feature. They also displayed higher intentions to protect the environment after interacting with the 360-degree videos.

Keywords

360-degree video environmental behavior social cognitive theory climate change virtual reality environmental self-efficacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abraham

Pane

Chairiyani

(2015). An investigation on cynicism and environmental self-efficacy as predictors of pro-environmental behavior. Psychology, 6, 234-242. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.63023

Ahn

S. J.

Bostick

Ogle

Nowak

K. L.

McGillicuddy

K. T.

Bailenson

J. N.

(2016). Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(6), 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12173

Ahn

S. J.

Fox

Dale

K. R.

Avant

J. A.

(2015). Framing virtual experiences: Effects on environmental efficacy and behavior over time. Communication Research, 42(6), 839-863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214534973

Ahn

Hong

Pedersen

P. M.

(2014). Effects of perceived interactivity and web organization on user attitudes. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14(2), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2014.880496

Archer

Finger

(2018). Walking in another’s virtual shoes: Do 360-degree video news stories generate empathy in viewers? https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8669W5C

Bae

H. S.

(2008). Entertainment-education and recruitment of cornea donors: The role of emotion and issue involvement. Journal of Health Communication, 13(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701806953

Bandura

(1988). Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. Anxiety Research, 1(2), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615808808248222

Bandura

(1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

Bandura

(2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

10.

Bandura

(2010). Self-efficacy. In The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (pp. 1-3). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836

11.

Bandura

Freeman

W. H.

Lightsey

(1999). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158.

12.

Beck

K. H.

(1979). The effects of positive and negative arousal upon attitudes, belief acceptance, behavioral intention, and behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 107(2), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1979.9922704

13.

Beuckels

Hudders

(2016). An experimental study to investigate the impact of image interactivity on the perception of luxury in an online shopping context. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.014

14.

Block

L. G.

Keller

P. A.

(1997). Effects of self-efficacy and vividness on the persuasiveness of health communications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0601_02.

15.

Bresó

Schaufeli

W. B.

Salanova

(2011). Can a self-efficacy-based intervention decrease burnout, increase engagement, and enhance performance? A quasi-experimental study. Higher Education, 61(4), 339-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9334-6

16.

Caprara

Alessandri

Eisenberg

(2012). Prosociality: The contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1289-1303. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025626

17.

Chu

K. M.

Yuan

J. C.

(2013). The effects of perceived interactivity on e-trust and e-consumer behaviors: The application of fuzzy linguistic scale. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 14(1), 124.

18.

Chung

D. S.

Yoo

C. Y.

(2008). Audience motivations for using interactive features: Distinguishing use of different types of interactivity on an online newspaper. Mass Communication and Society, 11(4), 375-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430701791048

19.

Cohen

(2015, September 23). Facebook debuts 360-degree videos. http://www.adweek.com/digital/360-degree-videos/

20.

deNoyelles

Hornik

S. R.

Johnson

R. D.

(2014). Exploring the dimensions of self-efficacy in virtual world learning: Environment, task, and content. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 255-271.

21.

Doherty

Webler

(2016). Social norms and efficacy beliefs drive the alarmed segment’s public-sphere climate actions. Nature Climate Change, 6(9), 879-879. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE3025

22.

Feng

(2018). Facilitator or inhibitor? The use of 360-degree videos for immersive brand storytelling. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18(1), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1446199.

23.

Feng

Xie

Lou

(2019). The key to 360-degree video advertising: An examination of the degree of narrative structure. Journal of Advertising, 48(2), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1585305

24.

Ferguson

M. A.

Branscombe

N. R.

(2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.010

25.

Fernández

B. R.

Warner

L. M.

Knoll

Montenegro

E. M.

Schwarzer

(2015). Synergistic effects of social support and self-efficacy on dietary motivation predicting fruit and vegetable intake. Appetite, 87, 330–335.

26.

Fonseca

Kraus

(2016). A comparison of head-mounted and hand-held displays for 360° videos with focus on attitude and behavior change. Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (pp. 287-296). ACM.

27.

Fraustino

J. D.

Lee

S. Y.

Lee

J. Y.

Ahn

(2018). Effects of 360° video on attitudes toward disaster communication: Mediating and moderating roles of spatial presence and prior disaster media involvement. Public Relations Review, 44(3), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.02.003

28.

Greussing

(2020). Powered by immersion? Examining effects of 360-degree photography on knowledge acquisition and perceived message credibility of climate change news. Environmental Communication, 14(3), 316-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1664607

29.

Hart

P. S.

Feldman

(2014). Threat without efficacy? Climate change on U.S. network news. Science Communication, 36(3), 325-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013520239

30.

Hayes

A. F.

(2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

31.

Horning

M. A.

(2017). Interacting with news: Exploring the effects of modality and perceived responsiveness and control on news source credibility and enjoyment among second screen viewers. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 273-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.023

32.

Hsu

M. H.

Chiu

C. M.

(2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38(3), 369-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.001

33.

Huang

(2016). Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2206-2212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.031

34.

Huber

M. Z.

Hilty

L. M.

(2015). Gamification and sustainable consumption: overcoming the limitations of persuasive technologies. In Hilty

Aebischer

(Eds,), ICT innovations for sustainability (pp. 367-385). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_22

35.

Joo

Y. J.

Bong

Choi

H. J.

(2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313398

36.

Kandaurova

Lee

S. H. M.

(2019). The effects of virtual reality (VR) on charitable giving: The role of empathy, guilt, responsibility, and social exclusion. Journal of Business Research, 100, 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.027

37.

Keeble

(2013). Young consumers hold the key to sustainable brands. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/young-consumers-key-sustainable-brands

38.

Kellstedt

P. M.

Zahran

Vedlitz

(2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 28(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x

39.

Klassen

R. M.

Chiu

M. M.

(2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237

40.

Lam

S. P.

(2006). Predicting intention to save water: Theory of planned behavior, response efficacy, vulnerability, and perceived efficiency of alternative solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(11), 2803-2824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00129.x

41.

Lang

(2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x

42.

Lee

Chung

(2013). Influence of gaming display and controller on perceived characteristics, perceived interactivity, presence, and discomfort. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 258-265). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39262-7_29

43.

Liffreing

(2018). National Geographic is using VR and social platforms to appeal to Gen Z. https://digiday.com/marketing/national-geographic-virtual-reality-social-gen-z/

44.

V. H.

Wei

(2013). Self-efficacy, information-processing strategies, and acquisition of health knowledge. Asian Journal of Communication, 23(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2012.725175

45.

Kim

Dou

X. Y.

Kumar

(2014). Promote physical activity among college students: Using media richness and interactivity in web design. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.012

46.

McEwen

W. J.

Greenberg

B. S.

(1970). The effects of message intensity on receiver evaluations of source, message, and topic. Journal of Communication, 20(4), 340-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00892.x

47.

Meinhold

J. L.

Malkus

A. J.

(2005). Adolescent environmental behaviors: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environment and Behavior, 37(4), 511-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504269665

48.

Moser

S. C.

Dilling

(2011). Communicating climate change: Closing the science-action gap. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0011

49.

Sundar

S. S.

(2015). How does interactivity persuade? An experimental test of interactivity on cognitive absorption, elaboration, and attitudes. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 213-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12147

50.

Papacharissi

Rubin

A. M.

(2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2

51.

Perez

(2017, May 22). Google’s new website explains Syrian refugee crisis with 360 degree photos, satellite imagery, video & more. https://techcrunch.com/2017/05/22/google-orgs-new-website-explains-syrian-refugee-crisis-with-360-degree-photos-satellite-imagery-video-more/

52.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 1-24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1

53.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Schumann

(1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1086/208954

54.

Pidgeon

(2012) Climate change risk perception and communication: addressing a critical moment?. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 951-956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01856.x

55.

Reeves

Nass

(2000). Perceptual user interfaces: Perceptual bandwidth. Communications of the ACM, 43(3), 65–70.

56.

Schild

(2020). 22 ways to leave home without actually leaving the couch, from virtual zoo exhibits to museum gallery tours. https://www.insider.com/museums-theme-parks-offer-virtual-tours-ideal-for-social-distancing-2020-3

57.

Sheeran

Harris

P. R.

Epton

(2014). Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 511-543. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033065

58.

Shin

Biocca

(2018). Exploring immersive experience in journalism. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2800-2823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817733133

59.

Shin

E. J.

Griffin

W. G.

(2017). The effectiveness of fear appeals in “green” advertising: An analysis of creative, consumer, and source variables. Journal of Marketing Communications, 23(5), 473-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2017.1290671

60.

Soliman

Peetz

Davydenko

(2017). The impact of immersive technology on nature relatedness and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Media Psychology, 29(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000213

61.

Steg

Bolderdijk

J. W.

Keizer

Perlaviciute

(2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002

62.

Steuer

(1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x

63.

Suh

Wang

Wagner

(2018). Enhancing audience engagement through immersive 360-Degree videos: An experimental study. In Schmorrow

Fidopiastis

(Eds.), Augmented cognition: Intelligent technologies. AC 2018 (pp. 425-443). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91470-1_34

64.

Sundar

S. S.

(2007). Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. In Joinson

A. N.

McKenna

K. Y. A.

Postmes

Reips

U.-D.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 89-104). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199561803.013.0007

65.

Sundar

S. S.

Kang

Oprean

(2017). Being there in the midst of the story: How immersive journalism affects our perceptions and cognitions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(11), 672-682. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0271

66.

Tabernero

Hernández

(2011). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 658-675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510379759

67.

Tse

Jennett

Moore

Watson

Rigby

Cox

A. L.

(2017, May). Was I there? Impact of platform and headphones on 360 video immersion. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2967–2974). ACM.

68.

Venhoeven

Bolderdijk

Steg

(2013). Explaining the paradox: how pro-environmental behaviour can both thwart and foster well-being. Sustainability, 5(4), 1372-1386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041372

69.

Vettehen

P. H.

Wiltink

Huiskamp

Schaap

Ketelaar

(2019). Taking the full view: How viewers respond to 360-degree video news. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041372

70.

Walker

C. O.

Greene

B. A.

Mansell

R. A.

(2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004

71.

Wang

Calder

B. J.

(2006). Media transportation and advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1086/506296

72.

Weinstein

Rogerson

Moreton

Balmford

Bradbury

R. B.

(2015). Conserving nature out of fear or knowledge? Using threatening versus connecting messages to generate support for environmental causes. Journal for Nature Conservation, 26, 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2015.04.002

73.

Wong

N. C.

(2012). Interaction of comparative cancer risk and cancer efficacy perceptions on cancer-related information seeking and scanning behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 29(3), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.684808

74.

Wood

Bandura

(1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279067

75.

Wright

B. J.

O’Halloran

P. D.

Stukas

A. A.

(2016). Enhancing self-efficacy and performance: An experimental comparison of psychological techniques. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 87(1), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2015.1093072

76.

Yoo

C. W.

Goo

Huang

C. D.

Nam

Woo

(2017). Improving travel decision support satisfaction with smart tourism technologies: A framework of tourist elaboration likelihood and self-efficacy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 330-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.071

77.

Zaichkowsky

J. L.

(1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1086/208520

How 360-Degree Video Influences Content Perceptions and Environmental Behavior: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Self-Efficacy

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References