Informal science communication efforts play a large role in individuals’ science learning. The present study sought to examine a nontraditional science communication environment: popular culture conventions. Utilizing the communication theory of identity, identity was examined to determine how participants expressed their identities when interacting with science in the convention environment. Qualitative interviews were held with audience members (n = 14) and science communicators (n = 13). Interviews were thematically analyzed using the constant comparative method. Results suggest that audience members could experience changes in their identity, shifting their views so they thought of themselves as users, learners, and consumers of science.
AndersonD.LucasK. B.GinnsI. S.DierkingL. D. (2000). Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post-visit activities. Science Education, 84(5), 658-679. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<658::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-A
3.
ArcandK.WatzkeM. (2010). Bringing the universe to the street. A preliminary look at informal learning implications for a large-scale non-traditional science outreach project. Journal of Science Communication, 9(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.09020201
4.
BoyetteT.RamseyJ. (2019). Does the messenger matter? Studying the impacts of scientists and engineers interacting with public audiences at science festival events. Journal of Science Communication, 18(02). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18020202
BultitudeK.SardoA. M. (2012). Leisure and pleasure: Science events in unusual locations. International Journal of Science Education, 34(18), 2775-2795. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.664293
7.
CarloneH. B.JohnsonA. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187-1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
8.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
9.
DallasD. (2014). Café Scientifique. In Tan Wee HinL.SubramaniamR. (Eds.), Communicating science to the public: Opportunities and challenges for the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 261-275). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9097-0_16
10.
DierkingL. D.AdelmanL. M.OgdenJ.LehnhardtK.MillerL.MellenJ. D. (2004). Using a behavior change model to document the impact of visits to Disney’s Animal Kingdom: A study investigating intended conservation action. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47(3), 322-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00128.x
11.
DrummondD. K.OrbeM. P. (2009). “Who are you trying to be?”: Identity gaps within intraracial encounters. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 10(1), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459430903236098
FalkJ. (2006b). The impact of visit motivation on learning: Using identity as a construct to understand the visitor experience. Curator, 49(2), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00209.x
16.
FalkJ. (2008). Viewing art museum visitors through the lens of identity. Part of the Special Issue, Museum Education, 34(2), 25-34.
FalkJ.HeimlichJ.BronnenkantK. (2008). Using identity-related visit motivations as a tool for understanding adult zoo and aquarium visitors’ meaning-making. Curator, 51(1), 55-79.
19.
FalkJ.RandolS.DierkingL. (2012). Mapping the informal science education landscape: An exploratory study. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 865-874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510393606
20.
FederM. A.ShouseA. W.LewensteinB.BellP. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. National Academies Press.
21.
Fogg-RogersL.WieheB.ComerfordD.FoosheeJ.DurantJ. (2019). Science live: Articulating the aims and ethos of science event practitioners in the U.S.A. and U.K. Journal of Science Communication, 18(04). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18040801
GauchatG. (2011). The cultural authority of science: Public trust and acceptance of organized science. Public Understanding of Science, 20(6), 751-770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510365246
24.
GeeJ. P. (2000). Chapter 3: Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X025001099
HechtM. L. (1993). 2002—A research odyssey: Toward the development of a communication theory of identity. Communication Monographs, 60(1), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376297
27.
HechtM. L.WarrenJ.JungE.KriegerJ. (2005). The communication theory of identity: Development, theoretical perspective, and future directions. In GudykunstW. B. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 257-278). Sage.
28.
JamesV. (2015). An examination of science communication efforts at popular culture conventions [Unpublished manuscript].
29.
JensenE.BuckleyN. (2014). Why people attend science festivals: Interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research. Public Understanding of Science, 23(5), 557-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512458624
30.
JungE.HechtM. L. (2004). Elaborating the communication theory of identity: Identity gaps and communication outcomes. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370197
31.
KirbyD. A. (2003). Scientists on the set: Science consultants and the communication of science in visual fiction. Public Understanding of Science, 12(3), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662503123005
32.
MaxwellJ. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Sage.
MyersO. E.SaundersC. D.BirjulinA. A. (2004). Emotional dimensions of watching zoo animals: An experience sampling study building on insights from psychology. Curator, 47(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00127.x
35.
NielsenK.GathingsM. J.PetermanK. (2019). New, not different: Data-driven perspectives on science festival audiences. Science Communication, 41(2), 254-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019832312
36.
RitterfeldU.WeberR.FernandesS.VordererP. (2004). Think science! Entertainment education in interactive theaters. Computers in Entertainment, 2(1), 11-11. https://doi.org/10.1145/973801.973819
37.
RockmanS.BassK.BorlandJ. (2007). Media-based learning science in informal environments [Commissioned paper]. Learning Science in Informal Environments Committee of the National Research Council & National Academy of Science. https://rockman.com/docs/downloads/MediaBasedLearningScience.pdf
38.
TalT.MoragO. (2009). Reflective practice as a means for preparing to teach outdoors in an ecological garden. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9131-1
39.
TocciJ. (2009). Geek cultures: Media and identity in the digital age (Publication No. 953) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania]. Penn Dissertations. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/953
40.
TracyS. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “Big-Tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
41.
TunnicliffeS. D. (2001). Talking about plants-comments of primary school groups looking at plant exhibits in a botanical garden. Journal of Biological Education, 36(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2001.9655792
42.
WeingartP.PansegrauP. (2003). Introduction: Perception and representation of science in literature and fiction film. Public Understanding of Science, 12(3), 227-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662503123001
43.
WooB. (2012). Alpha nerds: Cultural intermediaries in a subcultural scene. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(5), 659-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549412445758
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
