The Experience of Consensus: Video as an Effective Medium to Communicate Scientific Agreement on Climate Change

Abstract

Research on the gateway belief model indicates that communicating the scientific consensus on global warming acts as a “gateway” to other beliefs and support for action. We test whether a video conveying the scientific consensus on global warming is more effective than a text transcript with the same information. Results show that the video was significantly more effective than the transcript in increasing people’s perception of scientific agreement. Structural equation models indicate indirect increases in the beliefs that global warming is happening and is human-caused, and in worry about global warming, which in turn predict increased global warming issue priority.

Keywords

consensus gateway belief model descriptive norms video

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barron

Erev

(2003). Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 215-233.

Bolsen

Druckman

J. N.

(2018). Do partisanship and politicization undermine the impact of a scientific consensus message about climate change? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 389-402. doi:10.1177/1368430217737855

Brewer

P. R.

McKnight

(2017). “A statistically representative climate change debate”: Satirical Television news, scientific consensus, and public perceptions of global warming. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 25, 166-180. doi:10.1080/15456870.2017.1324453

Collins

R. L.

Taylor

S. E.

Wood

J. V.

Thompson

S. C.

(1988). The vividness effect: Elusive or illusory? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 1-18.

Cook

(2019). The consensus on consensus messaging. Retrieved from https://skepticalscience.com/consensus-consensus-messaging.html

Cook

Lewandowsky

(2016). Rational irrationality: Modeling climate change belief polarization using Bayesian networks. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 160-179.

Cook

Lewandowsky

Ecker

U. K.

(2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS One, 12, e0175799.

Cook

Oreskes

Doran

P. T.

Anderegg

W. R.

Verheggen

Maibach

E. W.

. . . Nuccitelli

(2016). Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 04800. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002

Dixon

(2016). Applying the gateway belief model to genetically modified food perceptions: New insights and additional questions. Journal of Communication, 66, 888-908. doi:10.1111/jcom.12260

10.

Flusberg

S. J.

Matlock

Thibodeau

P. H.

(2017). Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication, 11, 769-783.

11.

Goldberg

M. H.

van der Linden

Ballew

M. T.

Rosenthal

S. A.

Leiserowitz

(2019). The role of anchoring in judgments about expert consensus. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49, 192-200. doi:10.1111/jasp.12576

12.

Goldberg

M. H.

van der Linden

Maibach

Leiserowitz

(2019). Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(30), 14804-14805.

13.

Goode

M. R.

Dahl

D. W.

Moreau

C. P.

(2010). The effect of experiential analogies on consumer perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 274-286.

14.

Guadagno

R. E.

Rhoads

K. V. L.

Sagarin

B. J.

(2011). Figural vividness and persuasion: Capturing the “elusive” vividness effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 626-638.

15.

Harris

A. J.

Sildmäe

Speekenbrink

Hahn

(2018). The potential power of experience in communications of expert consensus levels. Journal of Risk Research, 22, 593-609. doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1440416

16.

Huck

S. W.

McLean

R. A.

(1975). Using a repeated measures ANOVA to analyze the data from a pretest-posttest design: A potentially confusing task. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 511-518.

17.

Kerr

J. R.

Wilson

M. S.

(2018). Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety. PLoS One, 13, e0200295. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200295

18.

Lakoff

Johnson

(1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

19.

Leiserowitz

Maibach

Roser-Renouf

Rosenthal

Cutler

Kotcher

(2018a). Climate change in the American mind, March 2018. New Haven, CT/Fairfax, VA: Yale University/George Mason University.

20.

Leiserowitz

Maibach

Roser-Renouf

Rosenthal

Cutler

Kotcher

(2018b). Politics and global warming, March 2018. New Haven, CT/Fairfax, VA: Yale University/George Mason University.

21.

Leiserowitz

Smith

(2017). Affective imagery, risk perceptions, and climate change communication. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science (pp. 1-29). doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.307

22.

Dixon

Hmielowski

J. D.

(2019). Psychological reactance from reading basic facts on climate change: The role of prior views and political identification. Environmental Communication, 13, 71-86.

23.

Marx

S. M.

Weber

E. U.

Orlove

B. S.

Leiserowitz

Krantz

D. H.

Roncoli

Philips

(2007). Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environmental Change, 17, 47-58. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.10.004

24.

Miller

D. T.

Prentice

D. A.

(2016). Changing norms to change behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 339-361.

25.

O’Neill

S. J.

Boykoff

Niemeyer

Day

S. A.

(2013). On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, 23, 413-421. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006

26.

O’Neill

Nicholson-Cole

(2009). “Fear won’t do it” promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30, 355-379. doi:10.1177/1075547008329201

27.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Springer.

28.

Prentice

D. A.

Miller

D. T.

(1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243-256.

29.

Schnall

(2012). Are there basic metaphors? In Metaphorical thought in social life. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

30.

Slovic

Finucane

M. L.

Peters

MacGregor

D. G.

(2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311-322.

31.

Sopory

Dillard

J. P.

(2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28, 382-419.

32.

StataCorp. (2017). Stata Statistical Software: Release 15 [Computer software]. College Station, TX: Author.

33.

Tankard

M. E.

Paluck

E. L.

(2017). The effect of a Supreme Court decision regarding gay marriage on social norms and personal attitudes. Psychological Science, 28, 1334-1344. doi:10.1177/0956797617709594

34.

Taylor

S. E.

Thompson

S. C.

(1982). Stalking the elusive” vividness” effect. Psychological Review, 89, 155-181.

35.

van der Linden

S. L.

Clarke

C. E.

Maibach

E. W

. (2015). Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: Evidence from a randomized experiment. BMC Public Health, 15, 1207. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4

36.

van der Linden

S. L.

Leiserowitz

A. A.

Feinberg

G. D.

Maibach

E. W

. (2014). How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? Climatic Change, 126, 255-262.

37.

van der Linden

S. L.

Leiserowitz

A. A.

Feinberg

G. D.

Maibach

E. W

. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS One, 10, e0118489. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489

38.

van der Linden

Leiserowitz

Maibach

. (2018). Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 2-3. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0259-2

39.

van der Linden

Leiserowitz

Maibach

. (2019). The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 49-58.

40.

van der Linden

Maibach

Cook

Leiserowitz

Ranney

Lewandowsky

. . . Weber

E. U

. (2017). Culture versus cognition is a false dilemma. Nature Climate Change, 7, 457-458. doi:10.1038/nclimate3323

41.

van der Linden

Maibach

Leiserowitz

. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 758-763. doi:10.1177/1745691615598516

42.

van der Linden

Maibach

Leiserowitz

. (2019). Exposure to scientific consensus does not cause psychological reactance. Environmental Communication. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1617763

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.56 MB