Routine Influences on Aquaculture News Selection: A Q Method Study With New England Journalists

Abstract

Environmental journalists, as gatekeepers, often become arbiters of risk and benefit information. This study explores how their routine news value judgments may influence reporting on marine aquaculture, a growing domestic industry with complex social and ecological impacts. We interviewed New England newspaper journalists using Q methodology, a qualitative dominant mixed-method approach to study shared subjectivity in small samples. Results revealed four distinct reporting perspectives—“state structuralist,” “neighborhood preservationist,” “industrial futurist,” and “local proceduralist”—stemming from the news value and objectivity routines journalists used in news selection. Findings suggest implications for public understanding of, and positionality toward, natural resource use and development.

Keywords

environmental journalism gatekeeping news values objectivity Q methodology aquaculture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahva

(2013). Public journalism and professional reflexivity. Journalism, 14, 790-806.

Amberg

S. M.

Hall

T. E.

(2010). Precision and rhetoric in media reporting about contamination in farmed salmon. Science Communication, 32, 489-513.

Applegate

(2009). The concepts of “news balance” and “objectivity.” Public Relations Quarterly, 52(4), 5-8.

Aquaculture Research Institute. (2017). Maine aquaculture economic impact report. Orono: University of Maine.

Bednarek

Caple

(2017). The discourse of news values: How organizations create newsworthiness. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Bell

(1991). The language of news media. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Berkowitz

D. A.

(2009). Reporters and their sources. In Wahl-Jorgensen

Hanitzsch

(Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 102-115). New York, NY: Routledge.

Besley

J. C.

Dudo

Yuan

(2018). Scientists’ views about communication objectives. Public Understanding of Science, 27, 708-730.

Boudana

(2016). Impartiality is not fair: Toward an alternative approach to the evaluation of content bias in news stories. Journalism, 17, 600-618.

10.

Boyer

J. H.

(1981). How editors view objectivity. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 24-28.

11.

Boykoff

M. T.

Boykoff

J. M.

(2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136.

12.

Boykoff

M. T.

Boykoff

J. M.

(2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38, 1190-1204.

13.

Brown

S. R.

(1970). On the use of variance designs in Q methodology. Psychological Record, 20, 179-189.

14.

Brown

S. R.

(1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3), 91-138.

15.

Brown

S. R.

Durning

D. W.

Selden

S. C.

(2007). Q methodology. In Yang

Miller

G. J.

(Eds.), Handbook of research methods in public administration (pp. 721-764). Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach.

16.

Buckalew

J. K.

(1969). News elements and selection by television news editors. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 14, 47-54.

17.

Caple

Bednarek

(2013). Delving into the discourse: Approaches to news values in journalism studies and beyond (Working paper). Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-01/Delving%20into%20the%20Discourse.pdf

18.

Cunningham

(2003). Re-thinking objectivity: In a world of spin, our awkward embrace of an ideal can make us passive recipients of the news. Columbia Journalism Review, 42(2), 24-33.

19.

D’Anna

L. M.

Murray

G. D.

(2015). Perceptions of shellfish aquaculture in British Columbia and implications for well-being in marine social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 57. doi:10.5751/ES-07319-200157

20.

Diana

J. S.

(2009). Aquaculture production and biodiversity conservation. Bioscience, 59(1), 27-38.

21.

Duffy

K. P.

Rickard

L. N.

(2017). Print media analysis of Maine aquaculture coverage. (Technical report). Orono: Sustainable Ecological Aquaculture Network, University of Maine.

22.

Dunwoody

(2005). Weight-of-evidence reporting: What is it? Why use it? Nieman Reports, 59(4), 89. Retrieved from https://niemanreports.org/articles/weight-of-evidence-reporting-what-is-it-why-use-it/

23.

Dunwoody

Peters

H. P.

(1992). Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks: A survey of research in the United States and Germany. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 199-230.

24.

Entman

R. M.

(1989). Democracy without citizens: Media and the decay of American politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

25.

Feucht

Zander

(2016). Aquaculture in the German print media. Aquaculture International, 25, 177-195.

26.

Fisher

R. A.

(1971). The design of experiments. New York: Hafner.

27.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Rome, Italy: Author.

28.

Froehlich

H. E.

Gentry

R. R.

Rust

M. B.

Grimm

Halpern

B. S.

(2017). Public perceptions of aquaculture: Evaluating spatiotemporal patterns of sentiment around the world. PLoS ONE, 12, e0169281. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169281

29.

Galow

C. F.

(1973). A comparison of one newspaper’s editor and subscriber news values (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 7408015)

30.

Galtung

Ruge

M. H.

(1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2, 64-90.

31.

Giannoulis

Botetzagias

Skanavis

(2010). Newspaper reporters’ priorities and beliefs about environmental journalism: An application of Q methodology. Science Communication, 32, 425-466.

32.

Goldman

(1999). Q methodology as process and context in interpretivism, communication, and psychoanalytic psychotherapy research. Psychological Record, 49, 589-604.

33.

Hanes

S. P.

(2018). Aquaculture and the postproductive transition on the Maine coast. Geographical Review, 108, 185-202.

34.

Harcup

O’Neill

(2001). What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies, 2, 261-280.

35.

Harcup

O’Neill

(2017). What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18, 1470-1488.

36.

Johnson

T. R.

Hanes

S. P.

(2017). Marine aquaculture in restructuring regions: Understanding a key coastal sustainability transition. Regions Magazine, 308(4), 13-15.

37.

Kaiser

H. F.

(1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.

38.

Kim

H. S.

(2002). Gatekeeping international news: An attitudinal profile of U.S. television journalists. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 431-452.

39.

Lapointe

(2013). Overview of the aquaculture sector in New England (NROC White Paper). Retrieved from https://northeastoceancouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Aquaculture-White-Paper.pdf

40.

Lester

(1980). Generating newsworthiness: The interpretive construction of public events. American Sociological Review, 45, 984-994.

41.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

42.

Lippmann

(1961). Public opinion. New York, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1922)

43.

Masterton

(2005). Asian journalists seek values worth preserving. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 16(6), 41-48.

44.

McKeown

Thomas

D. B.

(2013). Q methodology (Vol. 66). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

45.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

46.

Morse

J. M.

Barrett

Mayan

Olson

Spiers

(2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22.

47.

National Marine Fisheries Service. (2017). Fisheries of the United States, 2016 report. Retrieved from https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/fisheries-united-states-2016-report/

48.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2013). Office of aquaculture fact sheet. Retrieved from https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/aquaculture-library

49.

Olsen

M. S.

Osmundsen

T. C.

(2017). Media framing of aquaculture. Marine Policy, 76, 19-27.

50.

Östgaard

(1965). Factors influencing the flow of news. Journal of Peace Research, 2, 39-63.

51.

Pew Research Center. (2017). Newspapers fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/fact-sheet/newspapers/

52.

Ramlo

(2016). Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10, 28-45.

53.

Rickard

L. N.

Feldpausch-Parker

A. M.

(2016). Of sea lice and superfood: A comparison of regional and national news media coverage of aquaculture. Frontiers in Communication, 1, 14. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2016.00014

54.

Rickard

L. N.

Noblet

C. L.

Duffy

Brayden

W. C.

(2018). Cultivating benefit and risk: Aquaculture representation and interpretation in New England. Society & Natural Resources, 31, 1358-1378.

55.

Robertson

R. A.

Carlsen

E. L.

Bright

(2002). Effect of information on attitudes towards offshore marine finfish aquaculture development in northern New England. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 6, 117-126.

56.

Sanders

K. P.

(1967). Sports news reading: A Q-methodology approach (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 6716833)

57.

Sæbjørnsen

S. E. N.

Ellingsen

I. T.

Good

J. M. M.

Ødegård

(2016). Combining a naturalistic and theoretical Q sample approach: An empirical research illustration. Operant Subjectivity, 38(2), 15-32.

58.

Schlag

A. K.

(2011). Aquaculture in Europe: Media representations as a proxy for public opinion. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture, 3, 158-165.

59.

Schudson

(1978). Discovering the news. New York, NY: Basic Books.

60.

Schudson

(2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2, 149-170.

61.

Schultz

(2007). The journalistic gut feeling: Journalistic doxa, news habitus and orthodox news values. Journalism Practice, 1, 190-207.

62.

Schulz

W. F.

(1976). Die Konstrucktion von Realität in den Nachrichtenmedien: Analyse der aktuellen Berichterstattung [The construction of reality in the news media: An analysis of the news coverage]. Freiburg, Germany: Alber.

63.

Shoemaker

P. J.

(2006). News and newsworthiness: A commentary. Communications, 31, 105-111.

64.

Shoemaker

P. J.

Cohen

A. A.

(2006). News around the world: Practitioners, content, and the public. New York, NY: Routledge.

65.

Shoemaker

P. J.

Eichholz

Kim

Wrigley

(2001). Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 233-246.

66.

Shoemaker

P. J.

Reese

S. D.

(2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.

67.

Shoemaker

P. J.

Vos

T. P.

(2009). Gatekeeping theory. New York, NY: Routledge.

68.

Singer

J. B.

(1997). Still guarding the gate? The newspaper journalist’s role in an on-line world. Convergence, 3(1), 72-89.

69.

Staab

J. F.

(1990). The role of news factors in news selection: A theoretical reconsideration. European Journal of Communication, 5, 423-443.

70.

Stephenson

(1993). Introduction to Q-methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 17(1), 1-13.

71.

Streckfuss

(1990). Objectivity in journalism: A search and a reassessment. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 973-983.

72.

Tandoc

E. C.

Vos

T. P.

(2016). The journalist is marketing the news: Social media in the gatekeeping process. Journalism Practice, 10, 950-966.

73.

Thomas

D. B.

Baas

L. R.

(1992). The issue of generalization in Q methodology: “Reliable schematics” revisited. Operant Subjectivity, 16(1), 18-36.

74.

Ward

(1999). Pragmatic news objectivity: Objectivity with a human face (Discussion Paper D-37). Retrieved from https://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/d37_ward.pdf

75.

Ward

W. J.

(1967). News values, news situations, and news selections: An intensive study of ten city editors (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 6709114)

76.

Watts

Stenner

(2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 67-91.

77.

Westerståhl

(1983). Objective news reporting: General premises. Communication Research, 10, 403-424.

78.

Yang

J. H.

(2004). Constraints on environmental news production in the U.S.: Interviews with American journalists. Journal of International and Area Studies, 11, 89-105.