User Engagement in Public Discourse on Genetically Modified Organisms: The Role of Opinion Leaders on Social Media

Abstract

This study adopted a quantitative content analysis to examine how source attributes of opinion leaders and their message framing influenced user engagement in the public discourse of genetically modified organism (GMO) on Chinese social media. The findings showed that different source attributes and message frames used by opinion leaders varied in their respective influences on three dimensions of user engagement—reposts, comments, and likes. The attribute of account verification only predicted surface-level engagement (i.e., liking), whereas account type significantly influenced in-depth engagement (i.e., reposting and commenting). The fact, opportunity, pro-GMO, and international frames positively predicted user engagement.

Keywords

genetically modified organism user engagement opinion leader social media Weibo

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achenbach

. (2016, June 30). 107 Nobel laureates sign letter blasting Greenpeace over GMOs. The Washington Post, Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/06/29/more-than-100-nobel-laureates-take-on-greenpeace-over-gmo-stance/?utm_term=.8aabd5b5f3f0

BBC. (2017). Twitter user numbers overtaken by China’s Sina Weibo. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-39947442

Bodendorf

Kaiser

. (2009, November). Detecting opinion leaders and trends in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Social Web Search and Mining (pp. 65-68). New York, NY: ACM.

Brossard

Scheufele

D. A

. (2013). Science, new media, and the public. Science, 339, 40-41.

Bruening

Lyons

J. M

. (2000). The case of the Flavr Savr tomato. California Agriculture, 54(4), 6-7.

Burt

R. S

. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 37-54.

Carver

R. B.

Rødland

E. A.

Breivik

. (2012). Quantitative frame analysis of how the gene concept is presented in tabloid and elite newspapers. Science Communication, 35, 449-475.

Cha

Haddadi

Benevenuto

Gummadi

P. K

. (2010, May). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC.

Cho

Schweickart

Haase

. (2014). Public engagement with nonprofit organizations on Facebook. Public Relations Review, 40, 565-567.

10.

Choi

. (2015). The two-step flow of communication in Twitter-based public forums. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 696-711.

11.

Cui

Shoemaker

S. P

. (2018). Public perception of genetically-modified (GM) food: A nationwide Chinese consumer study. npj Science of Food, 2(10). Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-018-0018-4

12.

Daunert

Deo

Morin

Roda

. (2008). The genetically modified foods debate: Demystifying the controversy through analytical chemistry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 392, 327-331.

13.

Diana

Bahry

Masrom

. (2016, August). Website credibility and user engagement: A theoretical integration. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), Melaka, Malaysia.

14.

The Economist. (2014, January 14). From Weibo to Wechat: After a crackdown on microblogs, sensitive online discussion has shifted. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/china/21594296-after-crackdown-microblogs-sensitive-online-discussion-has-shifted-weibo-wechat

15.

Entman

R. M

. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.

16.

Feng

. (2016). Are you connected? Evaluating information cascades in online discussion about the #RaceTogether campaign. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 43-53.

17.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.). China at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/china/fao-in-china/china-at-a-glance/en/

18.

Gale

Lin

Lohmar

Tuan

. (2002). Is biotechnology in China’s future? In Gale

. (Ed.). China’s food and agriculture: Issues for the 21st century (pp. 34-37). Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.

19.

Google Trends. (2018). GMO. Retrieved from https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=GMO

20.

Gordon

. (1997). John Stuart Mill and the marketplace of ideas. Social Theory and Practice, 23, 235-249.

21.

Hilbeck

Binimelis

Defarge

Steinbrecher

Székács

Wickson

. . . Wynne

. (2015). No scientific consensus on GMO safety. Environmental Sciences Europe, 27(4), 1-6.

22.

Vermeer

E. B.

Zhao

J. H

. (2006). Biotechnology and food safety in China: Consumers’ acceptance or resistance. Development and Change, 37, 227-254.

23.

Huang

. (2016, June). The public debate on GMO issue in the network space: A study based on big data analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Chinese Communication Society, Chiayi, Taiwan.

24.

Huang

Sun

. (2014). Weibo network, information diffusion and implications for collective action in China. Information, Communication and Society, 17(1), 86-104.

25.

Jin

. (2017). Misunderstandings about GMO in public discourse. Science News Research, 2, 42-45.

26.

Jin

Jiang

Chen

Shen

. (2017). Effects of science communication on new media platforms: An examination of WeChat official accounts. Journal of China University of Geosciences, 17, 107-119.

27.

Katz

Lazarsfeld

P. F

. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New York, NY: Free Press.

28.

Keatley

K. L

. (2000). Controversy over genetically modified organisms: The governing laws and regulations. Quality Assurance: Good Practice, Regulation, and Law, 8(1), 33-36.

29.

Kim

Yang

S.-U

. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43, 441-449.

30.

Konnikova

. (2013, August 8). The psychology of distrusting G.M.O.s. The New Yorker, Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/the-psychology-of-distrusting-g-m-o-s

31.

Kwak

Lee

Park

Moon

. (2010, April). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC (pp. 591-600). New York, NY: ACM.

32.

. (2015, February 3). When GM foods are placed on your dinner table, do you eat it or not? China Youth Daily. Retrieved from http://zqb.cyol.com/html/2015-02/13/nw.D110000zgqnb_20150213_4-08.htm

33.

Jin

Qiu

Zhang

. (2017). Opinion differentiation: Exploring the agenda of GM food on Weibo. Retrieved from http://media.people.com.cn/n1/2017/0109/c409688-29009470.html

34.

Lü

Chen

. (2016). Chinese public’s risk perceptions of genetically modified food: From 1990 to 2015. Science, Technology and Society, 21, 110-128.

35.

Maeseele

P. A.

Schuurman

. (2008). Biotechnology and the popular press in northern Belgium. Science Communication, 29, 435-471.

36.

Margolis

. (1996). Dealing with risk: Why the public and the experts disagree on environment issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

37.

Martineau

. (2001). Food fight: The short, unhappy life of the Flavr Savr tomato. Sciences, 41(2), 24-29.

38.

McCay-Peet

Quan-Haase

. (2016). A model of social media engagement: User profiles, gratifications, and experiences. In O’Brien

Lalmas

. (Eds.), Why engagement matters: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and innovations on user engagement with digital media (pp. 199-217). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

39.

McInerney

Bird

Nucci

. (2004). The flow of scientific knowledge from lab to the lay public. Science Communication, 26, 44-74.

40.

Morris

E. J

. (2017). Governance of benefits and risks of GMOs in developing countries. In Adenle

A. A.

Morris

E. J.

Murphy

D. J

. (Eds.), Genetically modified organisms in developing countries: Risk analysis and governance (pp. 39-52). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

41.

Morris

M. R.

Counts

Roseway

Hoff

Schwarz

. (2012). Tweeting is believing? Understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 441-450). New York, NY: ACM.

42.

Napoli

P. M

. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

43.

Nelson

G. C

. (2011). Genetically modified organisms in agriculture: Economics and politics. Urbana: University of Illinois.

44.

Nisbet

E. C

. (2005). The engagement model of opinion leadership: Testing validity within a European context. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 3-30.

45.

Nucci

M. L.

Kubey

. (2007). “We begin tonight with fruits and vegetables”: Genetically modified food on the evening news 1980-2003. Science Communication, 29, 147-176.

46.

Bellur

Sundar

S. S

. (2015). Clicking, assessing, immersing, and sharing: An empirical model of user engagement with interactive media. Communication Research, 45, 737-763.

47.

Papacharissi

de Fatima Oliveira

. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62, 266-282.

48.

Patton

. (2014, September 30). China launches media campaign to back genetically modified crops. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-gmo/china-launches-media-campaign-to-back-genetically-modified-crops-idUSKCN0HP13X20140930

49.

Pornpitakpan

. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243-281.

50.

Priest

S. H

. (1994). Structuring public debate on biotechnology. Science Communication, 16, 166-179.

51.

Qiu

. (2014). Controversy of GM crops in China. National Science Review, 1, 466-470.

52.

Chen

Hou

Huang

Kang

. (2011). Safety investigation of genetic modified organisms in China I.: Public awareness of safety and risk associated with genetic modified organisms. Journal of China Agricultural University, 6, 1-10.

53.

Rogers

E. M

. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.

54.

Shoemaker

P. J.

Reese

D. S

. (2011). Mediating the message. New York, NY: Routledge.

55.

Statista. (2018). Most famous social network sites worldwide as of January 2018. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/

56.

Sullivan

. (2012). A tale of two microblogs in China. Media, Culture and Society, 34, 773-783.

57.

Sun

Youn

Kuntaraporn

. (2006). Online word-of-mouth (or mouse): An exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 1104-1127.

58.

Tagliabue

. (2016). The necessary “GMO” denialism and scientific consensus. Journal of Science Communication, 15(4), 1-11.

59.

Ten Eyck

T. A

. (1999). Shaping a food safety debate: Control effects of newspaper reporters and sources in the food irradiation controversy. Science Communication, 20, 426-447.

60.

Ten Eyck

T. A.

Williment

. (2003). The national media and things genetic: Coverage in the New York Times (1971-2001) and the Washington Post (1977-2001). Science Communication, 25, 129-152.

61.

USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. (2017). Peoples Republic of China agricultural biotechnology annual: Regulatory process continues churning, commercialization not in sight (GAIN Report No. CH 17054). Retrieved from https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Beijing_China%20-%20Peoples%20Republic%20of_12-29-2017.pdf

62.

Valente

T. W.

Coronges

Lakon

Costenbader

. (2008). How correlated are network centrality measures? Connect (Tor), 28(1), 16-26.

63.

Vigani

Raimondi

Olper

. (2012). International trade and endogenous standards: The case of GMO regulations. World Trade Review, 11, 415-437.

64.

Wasserman

Faust

. (1994). Social networks analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

65.

Weibo (2016). Individual verification. Retrieved from http://help.weibo.com/newtopic/verified

66.

Wong

A. Y.-T.

Chan

A. W.-K

. (2016). Genetically modified foods in China and the United States: A primer of regulation and intellectual property protection. Food Science and Human Wellness, 5, 124-140.

67.

W. W.

Sang

Blasiola

Park

H. W

. (2014). Predicting opinion leaders in Twitter activism networks: The case of the Wisconsin recall reelection. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 1278-1293.

68.

Yang

. (2014). Internet activism and the part-state in China. Daedalus, 143, 110-123.

69.

Yang

Tian

Zhang

. (2017). Identifying opinion leaders in social networks with topic limitation. Cluster Computing, 20, 2403-2413.

70.

Yang

Rodriguez

. (2014). The rejection of science frames in the news coverage of the golden rice experiment in Hunan, China. Health, Risk & Society, 16, 339-354.

71.

. (2016). Public discourse on genetically modified foods in mobile sphere: Framing risks, opportunities, and responsibilities on mobile social media in China. In Wei

. (Ed.), Mobile media, political participation, and civic activism in Asia: Private chat to public sphere (pp. 81-102). Singapore: Springer.

72.

Zhang

. (2014). Restrictions on genetically modified organisms: China. Legal reports. Library of Congress. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/law/help/restrictions-on-gmos/china.php#_ftn1