Increasingly, scientific communications are recorded and made available online. While researchers carefully draft the words they use, the quality of the recording is at the mercy of technical staff. Does it make a difference? We presented identical conference talks (Experiment 1) and radio interviews from NPR’s Science Friday (Experiment 2) in high or low audio quality and asked people to evaluate the researcher and the research they presented. Despite identical content, people evaluated the research and researcher less favorably when the audio quality was low, suggesting that audio quality can influence impressions of science.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235. doi:10.1177/1088868309341564
2.
BeggI. M.AnasA.FarinacciS. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446-458.
3.
GreifenederR.AltA.BottenbergK.SeeleT.ZeltS.WagenerD. (2010). On writing legibly: Processing fluency systematically biases evaluations of handwritten material. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 230-237.
4.
HenkelL. A.MattsonM. E. (2011). Reading is believing: The truth effect and source credibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1705-1721.
5.
LahamS. M.KovalP.AlterA. L. (2012). The name-pronunciation effect: Why people like Mr. Smith more than Mr. Colquhoun. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 752-756.
6.
Lev-AriS.KeysarB. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1093-1096.
7.
McGloneM. S.TofighbakhshM. S. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11, 424-428.
8.
NewmanE. J.SansonM.MillerE.Quigley-McBrideA.FosterJ. L.BernsteinD. M.GarryM. (2014). People with easier to pronounce names promote truthiness of claims. PLoS One, 9, e88671. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088671
9.
OppenheimerD. M. (2006). Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: Problems with using long words needlessly. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 139-156.
10.
ReberR.SchwarzN. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338-342.
11.
SchwarzN. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In Van LangeP.KruglanskiA.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289-308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
SchwarzN. (2015). Metacognition. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.BorgidaE.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Attitudes and social cognition (pp. 203-229). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
SchwarzN.NewmanE.LeachW. (2016). Making the truth stick & the myths fade: Lessons from cognitive psychology. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2(1), 85-95.
14.
UnkelbachC.StahlC. (2009). A multinomial modeling approach to dissociate different components of the truth effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 22-38.
