Women are still less present in scientific areas than men. This study analyzes the visual representation of women scientists in Spanish press and concludes that they are also underrepresented in newspapers. We analyze 1,134 photographs published in 2014 and 2015 in the science news sections of the four largest distribution Spanish newspapers. A tendency to present men more often as the protagonists of the information and women as a visual resource is also observed. This text proposes the need for the media to be aware of such underrepresentation and to match the number of men and women in graphic materials.
Adkins CovertT. J.WasburnP. C. (2007). Measuring media bias: A content analysis of Time and Newsweek coverage of domestic social issues, 1975-2000. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 690-706. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00478.x
2.
Aladro VicoE.Padilla CastilloR. R.Requeijo ReyP.SemovaD. J.García AgustínJ.García NietoM. T.Viñarás AbadM. (2014). Presence and representation of female scientists in the Spanish press. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 69, 176-194. doi:10.4185/RLCS-2014-1007en
3.
ArmstrongC. L. (2004). The influence of reporter gender on source selection in newspaper stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 139-154. doi:10.1177/107769900408100110
4.
BrescollV.LaFranceM. (2004). The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on sex differences. Psychological Science, 15, 515-520. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00712.x
5.
ChimbaM.KitzingerJ. (2010). Bimbo or boffin? Women in science: An analysis of media representations and how female scientists negotiate cultural contradictions. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 609-624. doi:10.1177/0963662508098580
6.
CrolleyL.TesoE. (2007). Gendered narratives in Spain: The representation of female athletes in Marca and El País. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 42, 149-166. doi:10.1177/1012690207084749
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
9.
DomkeD.PerlmutterD.SprattM. (2002). The primes of our times? An examination of the “power” of visual images. Journalism, 3, 131-159. doi:10.1177/146488490200300211
10.
DouglasS. (2010). Enlightened sexism: The seductive message that feminism’s work is done. New York, NY: Times Books.
11.
DuncanM. C. (1990). Sports photographs and sexual difference: Images of women and men in the 1984 and 1988 Olympic Games. Sociology of Sport Journal, 7, 22-43. doi:10.1123/ssj.7.1.22
12.
European Commission. (2016). She figures 2015. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2777/744106
13.
FahmyS.WantaW. (2007). What visual journalists think others think the perceived impact of news photographs on public opinion formation. Visual Communication Quarterly, 14, 16-31. doi:10.1080/15551390701361632
14.
FineC.RushE. (2016). Why does all the girls have to buy pink stuff? The ethics and science of the gendered toy marketing debate. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3080-3
15.
FreedmanE.FicoF. (2005). Male and female sources in newspaper coverage of male and female candidates in open races for governor in 2002. Mass Communication and Society, 8, 257-272. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0803_5
16.
GuillaumeC.PochicS. (2009). What would you sacrifice? Access to top management and work-life balance. Gender, Work & Organization, 16, 14-36. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00354.x
17.
KimH.KimS.FrearC.OhS. (2016). News photos of scientists skew race but not gender. Newspaper Research Journal, 37, 261-274. doi:10.1177/0739532916663210
18.
LongM.SteinkeJ.ApplegateB.Knight LapinskiM.JohnsonM. J.GhoshS. (2010). Portrayals of male and female scientists in television programs popular among middle school-age children. Science Communication, 32, 356-382. doi:10.1177/1075547009357779
19.
López-RabadánP.Casero-RipollésA. (2012). Evolution of the Spanish media agenda (1980-2010). Longitudinal analysis of the front pages of two of the most important Spanish newspapers. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 67, 459-480. doi:10.4185/RLCS-2012-964en
20.
MatudM. P.RodríguezC.EspinosaI. (2011). Gender in Spanish daily newspapers. Sex Roles, 64, 253-264. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9874-3
21.
MillerD. I.EaglyA. H.LinnM. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 631-644. doi:10.1037/edu0000005
22.
MorleyL. (2014). Lost leaders: Women in the global academy. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 114-128. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.864611
MüllerM. G.KappasA.OlkB. (2012). Perceiving press photography: A new integrative model, combining iconology with psychophysiological and eye-tracking methods. Visual Communication, 11, 307-328. doi:10.1177/1470357212446410
25.
National Science Board. (2016). Science and engineering labor force: Women and minorities in the S&E workforce. In Science & engineering indicators 2016 (pp. 83-101). Arlington, VA: Author.
26.
ReesT. (2001). Mainstreaming gender equality in science in the European Union: The “ETAN Report.”Gender and Education, 13, 243-260. doi:10.1080/09540250120063544
27.
The Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations. Global scientific collaboration in 21st century. London, England: Author.
28.
SchwartzD. (1992). To tell the truth: Codes of objectivity in photojournalism. Communication, 13(2), 95-109.
29.
ShacharO. (2000). Spotlighting women scientists in the press: Tokenism in science journalism. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 347-358. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/301
30.
ShorE.Van de RijtA.MiltsovA.KulkarniV.SkienaS. (2015). A paper ceiling. American Sociological Review, 80, 960-984. doi:10.1177/0003122415596999
31.
ShorE.Van de RijtA.WardC.AskarS.SkienaS. (2014). Is there a political bias? A computational analysis of female subjects’ coverage in liberal and conservative newspapers. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 1213-1229. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12091
32.
Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology. (2015). Indicadores del sistema español de ciencia, tecnología e innovación [Indicators of the Spanish system of science, technology and innovation]. Madrid, Spain: Author.
33.
Spanish National Research Council. (2016). Informe: Mujeres investigadoras 2016. Mujeres y ciencia [Report: Women researchers 2016. Women and science]. Madrid, Spain: Author.
34.
StanleyJ. (2012). Women’s absence from news photos: The role of tabloid strategies at elite and non-elite newspapers. Media, Culture & Society, 34, 979-998. doi:10.1177/0163443712455559
35.
WolfN. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York, NY: William Morrow.
36.
XieY. (2006). Theories into gender segregation in scientific careers. Women in scientific careers: Unleashing the potential (pp. 105-110). Paris, France: OECD.
37.
ZeldesG. A.FicoF. (2005). Race and gender: An analysis of sources and reporters in the networks’ coverage of the 2000 presidential campaign. Mass Communication and Society, 8, 373-385. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0804_5
