Statistics for Action project partners developed resources to bridge the divide between environmental professionals and residents affected by environmental contamination. Miscommunication is frustrating and frequent. Four principles that guided one STEM educator are illustrated with examples from work with residents of Hattiesburg, Mississippi. These principles may be useful to others intending to increase understanding among community group members and environmental regulators or professionals. The principles are especially relevant when tensions due to racial differences, priorities for next steps, or power imbalances due to funding streams threaten to derail communication.
AddyK.GreenL.HerronE.StepenuckK. (2010). Why volunteer water quality monitoring makes sense (USDA-NIFA Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring National Facilitation Project, Factsheet II). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from https://acwi.gov/monitoring/vm/publications/articles/article_Why_Makes_Sense.pdf
2.
BesleyJ. C.TannerA. H. (2011). What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate. Science Communication, 33, 234-263.
3.
BrossardD.LewensteinB. (2010). A crucial appraisal of models of public understanding of science: Using practice to inform theory. In KahlorL.StroutP. (Eds.), Understanding science: New agendas in science communication (pp. 11-39). New York, NY: Routledge.
SimisM. (2014, May). Predicting adherence to the deficit model: Research I scientists’ perceptions of how lay individuals form attitudes toward nanotechnology. Paper presented at the 13th International Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference, Salvador, Brazil. Retrieved from http://www.pcst-2014.org/pcst_proceedings/artigos/molly_simis_individual_papers.pdf
17.
WynneB. (1996). Maythe sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert–lay knowledge divide. In LashS.SzerszynskiB.WynneB. (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology (pp. 44-83). London, England: Sage.
