As a model of communication and engagement, citizen science has the potential to promote individual and collective climate change action. This article systematically reviewed literature that jointly addressed climate change and nature-based citizen science and identified 23 reported learning outcomes. Overall, evidence related to learning outcomes was limited across reviewed studies, but documentation of outcomes that are directly relevant to collective climate action was particularly scarce. Findings suggest more research examining citizen science from a collective climate action perspective is needed. To support future research efforts, results link the 23 revealed learning outcomes to two potential evaluation frameworks.
AdgerW. N. (2003). Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography,79, 387-404.
2.
BäckstrandK. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), 24-41.
3.
BeedenR. J.TurnerM. A.DrydenJ.MeridaF.GoudkampK.MaloneC.… MaynardJ. A. (2014). Rapid survey protocol that provides dynamic information on reef condition to managers of the Great Barrier Reef. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(12), 8527–8540.
4.
BoeroF.KrabergA. C.KrauseG.WiltshireK. H. (2015). Time is an affliction: Why ecology cannot be as predictive as physics and why it needs time series. Journal of Sea Research, 101, 12-18.
5.
BonneyR.PhillipsT. B.BallardH. L.EnckJ. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2-16.
6.
BrisboisM. C.de LoëR. C. (2015). Power in collaborative approaches to governance for water: A systematic review. Society & Natural Resources, 29, 775-790.
7.
BrossardD.LewensteinB.BonneyR. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1099-1121.
8.
BrulleR. J.CarmichaelJ.JenkinsJ. C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002-2010. Climatic Change, 114, 169-188.
9.
BurchS.ShawA.DaleA.RobinsonJ. (2014). Triggering transformative change: A development path approach to climate change response in communities. Climate Policy, 14, 467-487.
10.
CarolinT.BeltJ.SladekM. (2011). Citizen scientists in action: Providing baseline data for climate-sensitive species. Park Science, 28(1), 66-68.
11.
CrallA. W.NewmanG. J.StohlgrenT. J.HolfelderK. A.GrahamJ.WallerD. M. (2011). Assessing citizen science data quality: An invasive species case study. Conservation Letters, 4, 433-442.
12.
CronjeR.RohlingerS.CrallA.NewmanG. (2011). Does participation in citizen science improve scientific literacy? A study to compare assessment methods. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 10(3), 135-145.
13.
D’AmatoL. G.KrasnyM. E. (2011). Outdoor adventure education: Applying transformative learning theory to understanding instrumental learning and personal growth in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 42, 237-254.
14.
DanielsenF.BurgessN. D.JensenP. M.Pirhofer-WalzlK. (2010). Environmental monitoring: The scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of people’s involvement. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47(6), 1166–1168.
15.
DanielsenF.SkutschM.BurgessN. D.JensenP. M.AndrianandrasanaH.KarkyB.… ZahabuE. (2011). At the heart of REDD+: A role for local people in monitoring forests?Conservation Letters, 4(2), 158–167.
16.
DemerittD. (2002). What is the “social construction of nature”? A typology and sympathetic critique. Progress in Human Geography, 26, 767-790.
17.
DickinsonJ. L.ShirkJ.BonterD.BonneyR.CrainR. L.MartinJ.. . . PurcellK. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 291-297.
18.
DickinsonJ. L.ZuckerbergB.BonterD. N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41, 149-172.
19.
DiduckA.SinclairA. J.HostetlerG.FitzpatrickP. (2012). Transformative learning theory, public involvement, and natural resource and environmental management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55, 1311-1330.
20.
DonnellyA.CroweO.ReganE.BegleyS.CaffarraA. (2014). The role of citizen science in monitoring biodiversity in Ireland. International Journal of Biometeorology, 58(6), 1237–1249.
21.
EvansC.AbramsE.ReitsmaR.RouxK.SalmonsenL.MarraP. (2005). The Neighborhood nestwatch program: Participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conservation Biology, 19, 589-594.
22.
FeldmanL.HartP.S. (2016). Using political efficacy messages to increase climate activism: The mediating role of emotions. Science Communication, 38, 99-127.
23.
GeelsF. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21-40.
24.
Gorman-MurrayA. (2010). An Australian feeling for snow: Towards understanding cultural and emotional dimensions of climate change. Cultural Studies Review, 16, 60-81.
25.
HargreavesT. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 79-99.
26.
HaywoodB. (2016). Beyond data points and research contributions: The personal meaning and value associated with public participation in scientific research. International Journal of Science Education: Part B, 6, 239-262.
27.
JiguetF.DevictorV.JulliardR.CouvetD. (2012). French citizens monitoring ordinary birds provide tools for conservation and ecological sciences. Acta Oecologica, 44, 58–66.
28.
JonesC.HineD. W.MarksA. D. (2016). The future is now: Reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/risa.12601
29.
JordanR. C.BallardH. L.PhillipsT. B. (2012). Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen-science learning outcomes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 307-309.
30.
KahanD. M.PetersE.WittlinM.SlovicP.OuelletteL. L.BramanD.MandelG. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732-735.
31.
KitchenhamA. (2008). The evolution of John Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Journal of Transformative Education, 6, 104-123.
32.
Kyburz-GraberR. (2013). Socioecological approaches to environmental education and research. In StevensonR. B.BrodyM.DillonJ.WalsA. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 310-330). New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
LawrenceA. (2006). “No personal motive?” Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place & Environment, 9, 279-298.
34.
LawrenceA. (2009). The first cuckoo in winter: Phenology, recording, credibility and meaning in Britain. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 173–179.
35.
LeeT. M.MarkowitzE. A.HoweP. D.KoC.LeiserowitzA. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 5, 1014-2020.
36.
LeiserowitzA.MaibachE.Roser-RenoufC.FeinbergG.RosenthalS. (2015). Climate change in the American mind: March, 2015. New Haven, CT: Yale University & George Mason University.
37.
LevinK.CashoreB.BernsteinS.AuldG. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45, 123-152.
38.
MarshallN. J.KleineD. A.DeanA. J. (2012). CoralWatch: Education, monitoring, and sustainability through citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 332–334.
39.
McBrideB.BrewerC.BerkowitzA.BorrieW. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here?Ecosphere, 4(5), 1-20.
40.
McGreavyB.CalhounA. J.JansujwiczJ.LevesqueV. (2016). Citizen science and natural resource governance: Program design for vernal pool policy innovation. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 48.
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Miller-RushingA.EvendenA.GrossJ.MitchellB.SachsS. (2011). Parks use phenology to improve management and communicate climate change. Park Science, 28(2), summer2011.
44.
Miller-RushingA.PrimackR.BonneyR. (2012). The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 285-290.
45.
MoserS. C. (2016). Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: What more is there to say?Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7, 345-369.
46.
NeimanisA.CastledenH.RainhamD. (2012). Examining the place of ecological integrity in environmental justice: A systematic review. Local Environment, 17, 349-367.
47.
NewmanG.ChandlerM.ClydeM.McGreavyB.HaklayM.BallardH.. . . GalloJ. (2016). Leveraging the power of place in citizen science for effective conservation decision making. Biological Conservation. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.019
48.
NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M.MurphyS. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behaviour. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715-740.
49.
O’BrienK. L.WolfJ. (2010, March). A values-based approach to vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1, 232-242.
50.
OstromE. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20, 550-557.
51.
OttingerG. (2010). Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35, 244-270.
52.
PetticrewM.RobertsH. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
53.
PettsJ. (2007). Learning about learning: Lessons from public engagement and deliberation on urban river restoration. Geographical Journal, 173, 300-311.
54.
PolmanJ.L.NewmanA.SaulE.W.FarrarC. (2014). Adapting practices of science journalism to foster science literacy. Science Education, 98(5), 766-791.
55.
PopayJ.RobertsH.SowdenA.PetticrewM.AraiL.RodgersM.. . . DuffyS. (2008). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Lancaster, England: University of Lancaster.
56.
PotterW. J.Levine-DonnersteinD. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258-284.
57.
ProctorJ. D. (1998). The social construction of nature: Relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88, 352-376.
58.
RanneyM. A.ClarkD. (2016). Climate change conceptual change: Scientific information can transform attitudes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 39-75.
59.
RäthzelN.UzzellD. (2009). Transformative environmental education: A collective rehearsal for reality. Environmental Education Research, 15, 263-277.
RussellL. D. (2015). Democratizing the scientific space: The constellation of new epistemic strategies around the emerging metaphor of socially embedded autonomy. Technology in Society, 40, 82–92.
62.
RydinY.PenningtonM. (2000). Public participation and local environmental planning: The collective action problem and the potential of social capital. Local Environment, 5, 153-169.
63.
SchweizerS.DavisS.ThompsonJ. L. (2013). Changing the conversation about climate change: A theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environmental Communication, 7(1), 42-62.
64.
ShirkJ. L.BallardH. L.WildermanC. C.PhillipsT.WigginsA.JordanR.. . . KrasnyM. E. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 29.
65.
SpellmanK. V. (2015). Educating for resilience in the North: Building a toolbox for teachers. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 46-57.
66.
SpenceA.PoortingaW.PidgeonN. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32, 957-972.
67.
SterlingS. (2011). Transformative learning and sustainability: Sketching the conceptual ground. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 17-33.
68.
StoneG. A.DuffyL. N. (2015). Transformative learning theory: A systematic review of travel and tourism scholarship. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 15, 204-224.
69.
SwannD. E.SpringerA. C.O’BrienK. (2011). Using citizen science to study saguaros and climate change at Saguaro National Park. Park Science, 28(1), 69-72.
70.
TaylorE. W. (2009). Fostering transformative learning. In MezirowJ.TaylorE. W. (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp. 3-17). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
71.
TheobaldE. J.EttingerA. K.BurgessH. K.DeBeyL. B.SchmidtN. R.FroehlichH. E.. . . ParrishJ. K. (2015). Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181, 236-244.
72.
TranfieldD.DenyerD.SmartP. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207-222.
73.
van der LindenS. (2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112-124.
74.
van der LindenS.MaibachE.LeiserowitzA. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 758-763.
75.
von der PortenS.de LoeR. C. (2014). How collaborative approaches to environmental problem solving view indigenous peoples: A systematic review. Society & Natural Resources, 27, 1040-1056.
76.
WalsA. E.BrodyM.DillonJ.StevensonR. B. (2014). Convergence between science and environmental education. Science, 344, 583-584.
