A series of workshops on impediments and solutions to best practice in science communication in Australia not only provided insights into the diversity of the community of practice but also reflected discords between best practice and popular ideas among practitioners.
GroffmanP.StylinskiC.NisbetM.DuarteC.JordanR.BurginA.. . . ColosoJ. (2010). Restarting the conversation: Challenges at the interface between ecology and society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(6), 284-291.
2.
House of Lords. 2000. Science and Society. Select Committee on Science and Technology Science and Society (London).
3.
Inspiring Australia. (2010). A national strategy for engaging with the sciences. Canberra, Australia: Department of Innovation.
4.
Involve & National Consumer Council. (2008). Deliberative public engagement: Nine principles. National Consumer Council, London.
5.
MetcalfeJ. (2013, March12). Science engagement in Australia is a 20th century toy. Conversation.
6.
MetcalfeJ.AlfordJ.ShoreJ. (2012). National audit of Australian science engagement activities. Canberra, Australia: Inspiring Australia.
7.
NisbetM.HixonM.MooreK.NelsonM. (2010). Four cultures: New synergies for engaging society on climate change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(6), 329-331.
8.
Research Councils UK (RCUK). (2002). Dialogue with the public: Practical guidelines. Swindon, UK.
9.
RoweG.FrewerL. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(1).
10.
Science and Technology Engagement Pathways (STEP). (2012). Department of Innovation, Australia.
11.
van EsteR. (2008). Ten lessons for a nanodialogue: How to be deadly serious and still have serious fun. The Hague, Netherlands: Rathenau Institute.
