This study explores agenda setting, framing, and the concepts of media advocacy and mobilizing information through content analysis of The New York Times and The Washington Post news coverage of autism from 1996 to 2006, the year the Combating Autism Act was passed. Findings revealed that science frames decreased over time, while policy frames increased. Medical, government, family, and nonprofit sources were most common in news coverage. Solutions were mentioned more frequently than causes; however, mobilizing information was limited. Theoretical implications and practical applications are discussed.
AndsagerJ.PowersA. (2001). Framing women’s health with a sense-making approach: Magazine coverage of breast cancer and implants. Health Communication, 13, 163-185.
2.
AskelsonN.CampoS.MastinT.SlonskeM. (2009). The missing role of parents: A content analysis of newspaper coverage of parenting practices and communication strategies for addressing binge drinking. Communication Research Reports, 26(1), 50-61.
3.
Associated Press. (2006, December8). National briefing Washington: Autism research financing is approved. The New York Times, p. A33.
4.
BoyceT. (2006). Journalism and expertise. Journalism Studies, 7, 889-906.
ClarkeC. (2008). A question of balance: The autism-vaccine controversy in the British and American elite press. Science Communication, 30(1), 77-107.
12.
CobbR. W.ElderC. D. (1972). Participation in American politics—The dynamics of agenda-building. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
ConradP. (1999). Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science, 8, 285-302.
14.
CorbettJ. B.MoriM. (1999). Medicine, media, and celebrities: News coverage of breast cancer 1960-1995. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 229-249.
15.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
16.
EntmanR. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57, 163-173.
FombonneE. (2003). The prevalence of autism. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(1), 87-89.
19.
FriedmanD. B.Hoffman-GoetzL. (2003). Cancer coverage in North American publications targeting seniors. Journal of Cancer Education, 18, 43-47.
20.
FriedmanD. B.KaoE. K. (2008). A comprehensive assessment of the difficulty level and cultural sensitivity of online cancer prevention resources for older minority men. Preventing Chronic Disease, 5(1), A07.
21.
GardnerA.GeierstangerS.BrindisC.McConnelC. (2010). Clinic consortia media advocacy capacity: Partnering with the media and increasing policymaker awareness. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 293-306.
22.
GerberJ. S.OffitP. A. (2009). Vaccines and autism: A tale of shifting hypotheses. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 48, 456-461.
23.
GibsonT. (2010). The limits of media advocacy. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3(1), 44-65.
24.
GlanzK. (2002). Perspectives on group, organization and community interventions. In GlanzK.RimerB. K.LewisF. M. (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (pp. 289-403). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
GodleeF.SmithJ.MarcovitchH. (2011). Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. Lancet, 342, 64-66.
26.
HallahanK. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 205-242.
27.
HarrisG.O’ConnorA. (2005, June25). On autism’s cause, it’s parents vs. research. The New York Times, p. A1.
28.
HoffmanL. H. (2006). Is Internet content different after all? A content analysis of mobilizing information in online and print newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 58-76.
29.
HoffnerC.YeJ. (2009). Young adults’ responses to news about sunscreen and skin cancer: The role of framing and social comparison. Health Communication, 24, 189-198.
30.
HoltonA.WeberlingB.ClarkeC. E.SmithM. J. (2012). The blame frame: Media attribution of culpability about the MMR-autism vaccination scare. Health Communication. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.633158
31.
IyengarS. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
KensickiL. J. (2004). No cure for what ails us: The media-constructed disconnect between societal problems and possible solutions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 53-73.
33.
KimS.-H.CarvalhoJ. P.DavisA. G. (2010). Talking about poverty: News framing of who is responsible for causing and fixing the problem. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 563-581.
34.
KimS.-H.ScheufeleD.ShanahanJ. (2002). Thank about it this way: Attribute agenda setting function of the press and the public’s evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 1-25.
35.
KimS.-H.WillisL. A. (2007). Talking about obesity: News framing of who is responsible for causing and fixing the problem. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 359-376.
36.
KosickiG. M. (1993). Problems and opportunities in agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43, 100-127.
37.
LacyS.FicoF.SimonT. F. (1991). Fairness and balance in the prestige press. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 363-370.
38.
LawrenceR. G. (2004). Framing obesity: The evolution of news discourse on a public health issue. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(3), 56-75.
39.
LemertJ. B. (1981). Does mass communication change public opinion after all? A new approach to effects analysis. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
40.
LemertJ. B. (1984). News context and the elimination of mobilizing information: An experiment. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 243-259.
Len-RíosM. E.HinnantA.ParkS.-A.CameronG. T.FrisbyC. M.LeeY. (2009). Health news agenda building: Journalists’ perceptions of the role of public relations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 315-331.
43.
MaherM. T. (2001). Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting. In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 83-94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
MajorL. (2009). Break it to me harshly: The effects of intersecting news frames in lung cancer and obesity coverage. Journal of Health Communication, 14, 174-188.
45.
MarinG.Van Oss MarinB. (1990). Perceived credibility of channels and sources of AIDS information among Hispanics. AIDS Education and Prevention, 2, 154-161.
46.
MatthesJ. (2009). What’s in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals, 1990-2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 349-367.
47.
McCombsM.GhanemS. I. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 67-81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
McCombsM. E.ShawD. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
49.
MerrillJ. (1999). The global elite. IPI Report, 4, 13-15.
50.
NicodemusD. (2004). Mobilizing information: Local news and the formation of a viable political community. Political Communication, 21, 161-176.
51.
O’ConnorA. (2004, March2). Researchers retract a study linking autism to vaccine. The New York Times, p. A15.
52.
O’KeefeD.JensenJ. (2008). Do loss-framed persuasive messages engender greater message processing than do gain-framed messages? A meta-analytic review. Communication Studies, 59(1), 51-67.
53.
PettsJ.NiemeyerS. (2004). Health risk communication and amplification: Learning from the MMR vaccination controversy. Health, Risk & Society, 6, 7-23.
Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2008, November24). Health news coverage in the U.S. media. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/node/13770
56.
ReeseS. D. (2001). Prologue: Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
RiffeD.LacyS.FicoF. G. (2005). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
RiffeD.LacyS.ReimoldD. (2007). Papers lead TV in covering complex environmental issues. Newspaper Research Journal, 28, 77-87.
59.
RogersE. M.DearingJ. W.ChangS. (1991). AIDS in the 1980s: The agenda-setting process for a public issue. Columbia, SC: Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
60.
ScheufeleD.TewksburyD. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9-20.
61.
SlaterM. D.HayesA. F.ReinekeJ. B.LongM.BettinghausE. P. (2009). Newspaper coverage of cancer prevention: Multilevel evidence for knowledge-gap effects. Journal of Communication, 59, 514-533.
62.
SlaterM. D.LongM.BettinghausE. P.ReinekeJ. B. (2008). News coverage of cancer in the United States: A national sample of newspapers, television, and magazines. Journal of Health Communication, 13, 523-537.
63.
SmithK.WakefieldM. (2005). Textual analysis of tobacco editorials: How are key media gatekeepers framing the issues?American Journal of Health Promotion, 19, 361-368.
64.
TakeshitaT. (2006). Current critical problems in agenda-setting research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(3), 11-32.
65.
TannerA.FriedmanD. B. (2011). Authorship and information sourcing for health news on local TV news Web sites: An exploratory analysis. Science Communication, 33, 3-27.
66.
TannerA.FriedmanD.KoskanA.BarrD. (2009). Disaster communication on the Internet: A focus on mobilizing information. Journal of Health Communication, 14, 741-755.
67.
VastermanP.YzermansC. J.DirkzwagerA. E. (2005). The role of the media and media hypes in the aftermath of disasters. Epidemiological Reviews, 27, 107-114.
68.
WakefieldA. J.MurchS. H.AnthonyA.LinnellJ.CassonD. M.MalikM.. . . Walker-SmithJ. A. (1998). Ilead-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet, 351, 637-641.
69.
WallackL. (1990). Media advocacy: Promoting health through mass communication. In GlanzK.LewisF. M.RimerB. K. (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (pp. 370-386). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
70.
WallackL.DorfmanJ.JerniganD.ThembaM. (1993). Media advocacy and public health: Power for prevention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71.
WeaverD. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142-147.
72.
WeberlingB. (2010). Mobilizing disaster relief: U.S. media coverage and public response to the Asian tsunami and Pakistan earthquake. International Communication Research Journal, 45, 50-80.
WimmerR. D.DominickJ. R. (2006). Mass media research: An introduction (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
75.
WingL.PotterD. (2002). The epidemiology of autistic spectrum disorders: Is the prevalence rising?Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 8, 151-161.
