The Galathea 3 Expedition from 2006 to 2007 combined research and online news media, allowing journalists literally to “look over the shoulders of researchers.” The authors analyze 781 news articles published online by three media partners of the expedition, all well-established media companies including high-quality newspapers in their portfolio. Less than half of all articles covered research. The articles about research mainly represented researchers as knowledgeable, enthusiastic, and hardworking experts. Taking into consideration public criticism and clashes between journalists and researchers, the authors situate the research-media partnership and their findings in contemporary debates about science and the media.
AlbaekE.ChristiansenP. M.TogebyL. (2003). Experts in the mass media: Researchers as sources in Danish daily newspapers, 1961-2001. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 937-948.
2.
AndersenJ. (2007a, April11). Du store verden. Berlingske Tidende, p. 14.
3.
AndersenJ. (2007b, April5). Kulstoffets kloge kvinder. Berlingske Tidende, p. 13.
BeringM. (2007a, March26). Drengedrømmen. Jyllands-Posten, p. 5.
6.
BeringM. (2007b, March21). Gale Thea fortæller. Jyllands-Posten, p. 7.
7.
BesleyJ. C.KramerV. L.PriestS. H. (2008). Expert opinion on nanotechnology: Risks, benefits, and regulation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10, 549-558.
8.
BoelskifteE. (2006, August12). Galathea 3: Afrejse: Af sted med piber og trommer. Jyllands-Posten, p. 4.
9.
ConradP. (1999). Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science, 8, 285-302.
Dansk Ekspeditionsfond. (2006). Scientific research, dissemination of information, educational perspectives and good seamanship. Retrieved from http://www.galathea3.dk/uk/Menu/The+expedition
13.
DornanC. (1990). Some problems in conceptualizing the issue of science and the media. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 48-71.
14.
DunwoodyS.BrossardD.DudoA. (2009). Socialization or rewards? Predicting U.S. scientist-media interactions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 299-314.
15.
EjsingJ. (2007a, May15). Avis i ordkrig med forskere og sømænd. Berlingske Tidende, p. 13.
16.
EjsingJ. (2007b, May22). Morgenavis og universitet i Galathea-strid. Berlingske Tidende, p. 6.
FaircloughN. (1995). Media discourse. London, England: Edward Arnold.
20.
FaircloughN. (2003). Analysing discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
FaircloughN. (2007). Media discourse. London, England: Edward Arnold.
22.
FjæstadB. (2007). Why journalists report science as they do. In BauerM. W.BucchiM. (Eds.), Science communication between news and public relations (pp. 121-131). New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
FlemingC.HemmingwayE.MooreG.WelfordD. (2005). An introduction to journalism. London, England: Sage.
24.
FraylingC. (2005). Mad, bad and dangerous: The scientist and the cinema. London, England: Reaktion Books.
25.
FriedmanS. M.DunwoodyS.RogersC. L. (1986). Introduction. In FriedmanS. M.DunwoodyS.RogersC. L. (Eds.), Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news (pp. xi-xvii). New York, NY: Free Press.
GoodellR. (1986). How to kill a controversy: The case of recombinant DNA. In FriedmanS. M.DunwoodyS.RogersC. L. (Eds.), Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news (pp. 170-181). New York, NY: Free Press.
29.
GramS. (2007, June24). Stort kendskab til Galathea 3-ekspeditionen. Jyllands-Posten, p. 6.
30.
HaarderB. (2006, December28). Kronik: Anders Lund Madsen eller Galathea?Jyllands-Posten, p. 9.
31.
HansenL. H.RichardsonK. (2007, April25). Galathea 3: to succeser og én fiasko. Berlingske Tidende, p. 13.
32.
HaynesR. D. (1994). From Faust to Dr. Strangelove: Representations of the scientist in Western literature. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33.
HøegP. (1993). Smilla’s sense of snow. New York, NY: Dell.
MouritzenL. T. (2006, December16). Debat: Anders Lund gemte sig. Jyllands-Posten, p. 10.
48.
NelkinD. (1987). Selling science. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
49.
NielsenK. H. (2008). In quest of publicity: The science-media partnership of the Galathea Deep Sea Expedition from 1950 to 1952. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 464-480.
50.
NielsenL. H. (2007, February20). Frøken Camilas fornemmelse for vand. Berlingske Tidende, p.12.
51.
NisbetM. C.LewensteinB. V. (2002). Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication, 23, 359-391.
52.
PetersH. P. (1995). The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: Co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media Culture & Society, 17(1), 31-48.
53.
PetersH. P. (2008). Scientists as public experts. In BucchiM.TrenchB. (Eds.), Handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 131-146). New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
PetersH. P.BrossardD.de CheveigneS.DunwoodyS.KallfassM.MillerS.TsuchidaS. (2008a). Science communication: Interactions with the mass media. Science, 321, 204-205.
55.
PetersH. P.BrossardD.de CheveigneS.DunwoodyS.KallfassM.MillerS.TsuchidaS. (2008b). Science-media interface: It’s time to reconsider. Science Communication, 30, 266-276.
56.
PilegaardH. (2007, March23). Mudder fortæller om fremtidens klima. Berlingske Tidende, p. 14.
57.
PriestS. H.GillespieA. W. (2000). Seeds of discontent: Expert opinion, mass media messages, and the public image of agricultural biotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 6, 529-539.
58.
RasmussenJ. (2006, October23). Oceanets vandlopper under lup. Berlingske Tidende, p. 10.
