Understanding how genetic science is communicated to the lay public is of great import. To address this issue, this study examines the presentation of genetic research relating to cancer outcomes and behaviors (i.e., prostate cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, smoking and obesity) in both the press release (n = 23) and its subsequent news coverage (n = 71). Data suggest that genetic discoveries are presented in a biologically deterministic and simplified manner 67.5% of the time. The introduction of deterministic language is attributed equally to both press releases and news coverage. Also, there are substantive differences between content introduced in the press release and content presented in subsequent press coverage; in fact, when two sources report on the same scientific discovery, the information is inconsistent more than 40% of the time. These findings suggest that the intermediary press release may serve as a source of distortion in the dissemination of science to the lay public.
Bernhardt, J.M., & Cameron, K.A. (2003). Accessing, understanding, and applying health communication messages: The challenge of health literacy. In T. L. Thompson, A. M. Dorsey, K. I. Miller, & R. Parrot (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 583-606). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Bor, J. (2006, September 8). Genetic code of cancers mapped: Hopkins researchers find new leads on breast, colon tumors. Baltimore Sun, p. 1A.
3.
Borchelt, R.E. (2001). Communicating the future: Report of the research roadmap panel for public communication of science and technology in the twenty-first century. Science Communication, 23, 194-211.
4.
Broadstock, M., Michie, S., & Marteau, T. (2000). Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: A systematic review. European Journal of Human Genetics , 8, 731-738.
5.
Bubela, T.A., & Caulfield, T.A. (2004). Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170(9), 1399-1407.
6.
Cappella, J.N., Lerman, C., Romantan, A., & Baruh, L. (2005). News about genetics and smoking: Priming, family smoking history, and news story believability on inferences of genetic susceptibility to tobacco addiction. Communication Research, 32(4), 478-502.
7.
Cappella, J.N., Mittermaier, D.J., Weiner, J., Humphreys, L., & Falcone, T. (2007, November). Framing genetic risk in print and broadcast news: A content analysis. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, Chicago.
8.
Carsten, L.D., & Illman, D.L. (2002). Perceptions of accuracy in science writing. IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication, 45(3), 153-156.
9.
Caulfield, T. (2000). Underwhelmed: Hyperbole, regulatory policy and the genetic revolution. McGill Law Journal, 45, 437-460.
10.
Condit, C. (2007). How geneticists can help reporters to get their story right. Nature Reviews, 8, 815-820.
11.
Condit, C., Ferguson, A., Kassel, R., Thadhani, C., Gooding, H.C., & Parrott, R. (1999). A exploratory study of the impact of news headlines on genetic determinism. Science Communication, 22, 379-395.
12.
Condit, C.M., Ofulue, N., & Sheedy, K.M. (1998). Determinism and mass-media portrayals of genetics . American Journal of Human Genetics, 62, 979-984.
13.
Condit, C.M., & Parrot, R. (2004). Perceived levels of health risk associated with linguistic descriptors and type of disease. Science Communication , 26, 152-161.
14.
Conrad, P. (1997). Public eyes and private genes: Historical frames, news constructions, and social problems. Social Problems, 44(2), 139-154.
15.
Conrad, P. (2001). Media images, genetics and culture: Potential impacts of reporting scientific findings on bioethics. In C. B. Hoffmaster (Ed.), Bioethics in social context (pp. 90-111). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
16.
Conrad, P., & Weinberg, D. (1996). Has the gene for alcoholism been discovered three times since 1980? A news media analysis. Perspectives on Social Problems, 8, 3-25.
17.
Dunwoody, S. (1999). Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertainty . In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communication uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 59-79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Dunwoody, S., & Ryan, M. (1983). Public information persons as mediators between scientists and journalists. Journalism Quarterly, 60, 647-656.
19.
Einsiedel, E.F., & Thorne, B. (1999). Public responses to uncertainty. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody , & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communication uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 43-57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (Eds.). (1999). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Frosch, D., Mello, P., & Lerman, C. (2005). Behavioral consequences of testing for obesity risk. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, & Prevention, 14(6), 1485-1489.
22.
Gaskell, G., & Bauer, M. W. (Eds.). (2001). Biotechnology 1996-2000: The years of controversy. London: Science Museum.
23.
Geller, G., Bernhardt, B.A., & Holtzman, N.A. (2002). The media and public reaction to genetic research. Journal of the American Medical Association , 287, 773.
24.
Harvard School of Public Health. (April, 2006 ). Gene variant associated with obesity risk found with new statistical technique (Press release). Boston: Author.
25.
Hubbard R., & Wald, E. (1993). Exploding the gene myth. Boston : Beacon.
26.
Jensen, J.D. (2008). Scientific uncertainty in news coverage in cancer research: Effects of hedging on scientists and journalists' credibility. Human Communication Research, 34, 347-369.
27.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ( 2004, August 17). Other highlights in the August 18 JNCI (Press release). Bethesda, MD: Author.
28.
Kim, J., Wyatt, R.O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication , 16, 361-385.
29.
Kua, E., Reder, M., & Grossel, M.J. (2004). Science in the news: A study of reporting genomics . Public Understanding of Science, 13, 309-322.
30.
Lee, C.-J., & Scheufele, D.A. (2006). The influence of knowledge and deference toward scientific authority: A media effects model for public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 819-834.
31.
Logan, R.A. (2001). Science mass communication: Its conceptual history . Science Communication, 23, 135-163.
32.
MacDonald, M.M., & Hoffman-Goetz, L. (2002). A retrospective study of the accuracy of cancer information in Ontario daily newspapers. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 93(2), 142-145.
33.
McCall, R.B. (1988). Science and the press: Like oil and water? American Psychologist, 43(2), 87-94.
34.
McCall, R.B., & Stocking, S.H. (1982). Between scientists and public: Communicating psychological research through the mass media. American Psychologist, 37(9), 985-995.
35.
McEnery, R. (2006, September 8). Case team helps crack genetic code of tumors. Cleveland Plain Dealer, p. A1.
36.
McInerney, C., Bird, N., & Nucci, M. (2004). The flow of scientific knowledge from lab to the lay public. Science Communication, 26, 44-74.
37.
McQuail, D. (2000). McQuail's mass communication theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Melzer, D., & Zimmern, R. (2002). Genetics and medicalisation. British Medical Journal, 324, 863-864.
39.
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. (2005 , July 27). Researchers identify gene set linked to breast cancer's spread to lungs (Press release). New York: Author.
40.
Mountcastle-Shah, E., Tambor, E., Geller, G., Karalisukas, R., Rodgers, J., & Holtzman, N.A. (2003). Assessing mass media reporting of disease-related genetic discoveries: Development of an instrument and initial findings. Science Communication, 24, 458-478.
41.
Moyer, A., Greener, S., Beauvais, J., & Salovey, P. (1995). Accuracy of health research reported in the popular press: Breast cancer and mammography. Health Communication , 7(2), 147-161.
42.
National Institutes of Health. (2006, September 7). Statement from the NIH on cancer genetics findings at Johns Hopkins University. Bethesda, MD: Author.
43.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2008). Science and engineering indicators 2008. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
44.
Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology (Rev. ed.). New York: Freeman.
45.
Nelkin, D. (2001). Molecular metaphors: The gene in popular discourse . Nature Reviews. Genetics, 2(7), 555-559.
46.
Nelkin, D., & Lindee, S. (1995). The DNA mystique: The gene as cultural icon. New York: Freeman.
47.
Parrot, R., Silk, K., Weiner, J., Condit, C., Harris, T., & Bernhardt, J. (2004). Deriving lay models of uncertainty about genes' role in illness causation to guide communication about human genetics. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 105-122.
48.
Peterson, A. (2001). Biofantasies: Genetics and medicine in the print news media. Social Science and Medicine, 52, 1255-1268.
49.
Priest, S.H. (1999). Popular beliefs, media, and biotechnology. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communication uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 95-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
Ransohoff, D., & Ransohoff, R. (2001). Sensationalism in the media: When scientists and journalists may be complicit collaborators. Effective Clinical Practice, 4, 185-188.
51.
Ricks, D. (2005a, July 28). Cancer cells' need to roam; Scientists track breast tumor genes that somehow communicate to target other organs. Newsday, p. A26.
52.
Ricks, D. (2005b, July 28). Scientists tag genes that stir breast cancer's spread. Orlando Sentinel, p. A18.
53.
Rogers, C.L. (1999). The importance of understanding audiences. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (p. 191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
Schwartz, L., Woloshin, S., & Baczek, L. (2002). Media coverage of scientific meetings. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2859-2863.
55.
Shannon, C.E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, Illinoise: University if Illinois Press.
56.
Silva, V.T. (2005). In the beginning was the gene: The hegemony of genetic thinking in contemporary culture. Communication Theory , 15(1), 100-123.
57.
Singer, E. (1990). A question of accuracy: How journalists and scientists report research on hazards. Journal of Communication, 40(4), 102-116.
58.
Smith, S. (2006, April 17). Genetic discovery one day could lead to weight loss. Boston Globe, p. B9.
59.
Stocking, S.H. (1999). How journalists deal with scientific uncertainty . In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communication uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 23-41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
Szabo, L. (2005, October 28). Findings identify likely origin of prostate cancer. USA Today, p. 7A.
61.
Tankard, J.W., & Ryan, M. (1974). News source perceptions of accuracy of science coverage. Journalism Quarterly, 51(2), 219-225, 334.
62.
Ten Eyck, T.A., & Willment, M. (2003). The national media and things genetic: Coverage in the New York Times (1971-2001) and the Washington Post (1977-2001). Science Communication, 25, 129-152.
63.
Tichenor, P.J., Olien, C.N., Harrison, A., & Donohue, G. (1970). Mass communication systems and communication accuracy in science news reporting. Journalism Quarterly, 47, 673-683.
64.
Translational Genomics Research Institute. ( 2004, August 17). Study narrows search for genes putting men at increased risk for prostate cancer (Press release). Phoenix, AZ: Author.
65.
University of Michigan Health System. (2005 , October 27). U-M scientists say fused genes trigger the development of prostate cancer (Press release). Ann Arbor: Author.
66.
Wade, N. (2006, April 18). Common genetic link to obesity is discovered . New York Times, p. F2, F4.
67.
Weigold, M.F. (2001). Communicating science: A review of the literature . Science Communication, 23, 164-193.
68.
Woloshin, S., & Schwartz, L. (2002). Press releases: Translating research into news . Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(21), 2856-2858.
