This study uses a quasi-experimental design to assess the impact of pro- and anti-food irradiation messages on consumer opinions. The data came from a panel study of 223 adults in Minneapolis, Minnesota, who completed three successive questionnaires. One group received a packet of information materials; another did not. Packet recipients perceived irradiation to be less safe and held less favorable opinions about the protagonists in the irradiation debate. Opinions changed over three months, although the changes were not statistically significant. Those who did not receive the packet showed significantly more favorable opinions of food irradiation opponents.
Arkin, E.A.
, and
D.B. McCallum.1988. Public knowledge and attitudes: Environmental issues related to toxic chemicals: A review of public polling data, 1984—1987 . Internal Report,
U.S. Environmental protection Agency, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation
.
2.
Bohlen, J.M.1964. The adoption and diffusion of ideas in agriculture. In Our changing rural society: Perspectives and trends, edited by
J. H. Copp
, 265–87.
Ames, IA : Iowa State University Press
.
3.
Bord, R.J.
, and
R.E. O'Connor.1989.
Who wants irradiated food?: Untangling complex public opinion
. Food Technology43:
87–97
.
4.
Brand Group.1986. Irradiated seafood product: Final report.
Chicago: Brand Group
.
5.
Bruhn, C.M.
, and
J.W. Noell.1987.
Consumer in-store response to irradiated papayas
. Food Technology41 (9):
83–85
.
6.
Bruhn, C.M.
,
H.G. Schutz
, and
R. Sommer.1986.
Attitude change toward food irradiation among conventional and alternative consumers
. Food Technology40 (12):
86–91
.
7.
Buller, D.B.
,
R. Borland
, and
M. Burgoon.1997.
Impact of behavioral intention on effectiveness of message features: Evidence from the family safety project
. Human Communication Research24:
433–53
.
8.
Coughenour, C.M.1968. Diffusion research needs (North Central Regional Research Bulletin 186).
Columbia, MO: Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station
.
9.
Covello, V.T.
,
P. Slovic
, and
D. von Winterfeldt .1987. Risk communication: A review of the literature. Unpublished paper.
10.
Dietz, T.F.
,
S.A. Frisch
, and
L. Kalof.1995.
Values and vegetarianism: An exploratory analysis
. Rural Sociology60:
533–642
.
11.
Fishbein, M.
, and
I. Ajzen.1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
.
12.
Gallup.1993. A survey of consumers' awareness, knowledge, and attitudes toward the process of irradiation (Summary report).
Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization
.
13.
Hoban, T.1995.
Measuring the benefits of local public goods: Environmental quality in Gaston County, North Carolina
. Applied Economics27:
1253–60
.
14.
Kasper, R.1980. Perceptions of risk and their effects on decision making . In Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough, edited by
R. Schwing
and
W. Albers
, Jr., 71–81.
New York: Plenum
.
15.
Klonglan, G.E.
, and
E.W. Coward
, Jr. 1970.
The concept of symbolic adoption: A suggested interpretation
. Rural Sociology35:
77–83
.
16.
Maciorowski, K.G.
,
S.C. Ricke
, and
S.G. Birkhold.1998. Consumer food safety awareness and acceptance of irradiated raw poultry in three Texas cities (Working paper).
College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, Department of Poultry Science
.
17.
Market Facts.1998.
Consumers' views on food irradiation. Food Marketing Institute and The Grocery Manufacturers ofAmerica.
18.
McCombs, M.E.
, and
D.L. Shaw.1972.
The agenda setting function of the mass media
. Public Opinion Quarterly36:
176–87
.
19.
McIntosh, W.A.1996. Sociologies of food and nutrition.
New York: Plenum Press
.
20.
McKean, J.1996. Irradiation of meat: An educational program.
Ames, IA: Iowa State University, Iowa Pork Industry Center
.
21.
Murano, E.A.
,
D.J. Hayes
,
P.S. Murano
,
D.G. Olson
, and
S.G. Sapp.1995. Food irradiation: A sourcebook.
Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press
.
22.
Nowak, P.J.1987.
The adoption of agricultural conservation technologies: Economic and diffusion explanations
. Rural Sociology52:
208–20
.
23.
Nowak, P.J.
, and
P.F. Korsching.1983. Social and institutional factors affecting the adoption and maintenance of agricultural BMPs. In Agricultural management and water quality, edited by
F. Schaller
and
G. Bailey
, 349–473.
Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press
.
24.
Otway, H.
, and
K. Thomas.1982.
Reflections on risk perception and policy
. Risk Analysis2:
69–82
.
25.
Petty, R.E.
, and
J.T. Cacioppo.1986. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change.
New York: Springer-Verlag
.
26.
Rogers, E.M.1995. Diffusion of innovations (4th ed).
New York: Free Press
.
27.
Rogers, E.M.
, and
F.F. Shoemaker.1971. Communication of innovations.
New York: Free Press
.
28.
Sapp, S.G.1995. Consumer acceptance of irradiated food. In Food irradiation: A sourcebook, edited by
E. A. Murano
,
D.J. Hayes
,
P.S. Murano
,
D. G. Olson
, and
S. G. Sapp
, 89–110.
Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press
.
29.
Sapp, S.G.
, and
W.J. Harrod.1990.
Consumer acceptance of irradiated food: An examination of symbolic adoption
. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics14:
133–45
.
30.
———. 1994a.
The social construction of consumer risk assessments
. Journal of Home Economics and Consumer Studies18:
97–106
.
31.
———. 1994b.
Socially constructed subjective norms and subjective norm-behavior consistency
. Social Behavior and Personality22 (1):
31–40
.
32.
Sapp, S.G.
,
W.J. Harrod
, and
L. Zhao.1995.
Social demographic and attitudinal determinants of consumer acceptance of food irradiation
. Agribusiness11 (2):
117–30
.
33.
Schutz, H.G.
,
C.M. Bruhn
, and
K.V. Diaz-Knauf .1989.
Consumer attitudes toward irradiated foods: Effects of labeling and beliefs information
. Food Technology43 (10):
80–86
.
34.
Shaw, D.L.
, and
M.E. McCombs.1977. The emergence of American political issues.
St. Paul, MN: West
.
35.
Slater, M.D.
, and
D. Rouner.1996a.
How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journalism andMass Communication Quarterly73:
974–91
.
36.
———. 1996b.
Value affirmative and value protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistics and anecdotes
. Communication Research23:
210–35
.
37.
Taylor, D.L.
, and
W.L. Miller.1978.
The adoption process and environmental decisions: A case study of a government project
. Rural Sociology43:
634–48
.
38.
Weise Research Associates.1984. Consumer reaction to the irradiation concept.
Omaha, NE : Weise Research Associates
.
39.
Wilkening, E.A.1953. Adoption of improved farm practices as related to family factors (Research Bulletin 183).
Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station
.
40.
Zey, M.
, and
W.A. McIntosh.1992.
Predicting intent to consume beef: Normative versus attitudinal influences
. Rural Sociology57:
250–65
.
