This article attempts to define cultural distance and proposes a method to empirically measure it. Using the survey data on perceptions of common citizens, the authors measure this distance in this article by the number of years spent in formal schooling. Cultural distances based on people's explanations of various natural phenomena have been mapped to demonstrate efficacy of the proposed method. The authors argue that the determinants of the magnitude of the cultural distance are (1) the complexity involved in explaining a phenomenon, (2) its life cycle, (3) individual or a collective control that can be exercised to alter the life cycle, and (4) the intensity with which a phenomenon intervenes in the daily life of common citizens.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bhattacharya, N.1983. The cultural heritage of India. Vol. 4, The religions. Calcutta, India: The Ramakrishna Mission, Institute of Culture.
2.
Bensaude-Vincent, B.2001. A genealogy of the increasing gap between science and the public. Public Understanding of Science10:99-113.
Durant, J.1993. What is scientific literacy? In Science and Culture in Europe, edited by J. Durant and J. Gregory, 129-137. London: Science Museum.
5.
Durant, J., and M. Bauer. 1992. British public perception of astrology: An approach from the sociology of knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, February, Chicago.
6.
Geertz, C.1999. A life of learning, Charles Homer Haskins lecture for 1999, American Council of Learned Societies. Occasional Paper No. 45.
7.
Godin, B., and Y. Gingras. 2000. What is scientific and technological culture and how is it measured? A multidimensional model. Public Understanding of Science9:43-58.
8.
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. 2000. Science and society—Third report. London: House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology.
9.
Lee, O., S. H. Fradd, and F. X. Sutman. 1995. Science knowledge and cognitive strategy use among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Journal of Research in Teaching32 (8): 797-816.
10.
Levis, F. R.1962. Two cultures? The significance of C. P. Snow. London: Chatto and Windus.
11.
Lightman, A. P., and J. D. Miller. 1989. Contemporary cosmological beliefs. Social Studies of Science19:127-136.
12.
Miller, J. D., R. Pardo, and F. Niwa. 1996. Public understanding and attitudes toward science and technology: A comparative analysis of Canada, the European Union, Japan, and the United States. Paper presented at a World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR) Regional Conference, 9 November, Tokyo, Japan.
13.
Miller, J. D.1997. Public perceptions of science and technology: A comparative study of European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Chicago: Chicago Academy of Sciences.
14.
Miller, S.2001. Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science10:115-120.
15.
National Science Foundation. 1993. Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
16.
National Science Foundation. 1996. Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
17.
National Science Foundation. 1998a. Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
18.
National Science Foundation. 1998b. Science and technology: Public attitudes and public understanding. Science and engineering indicators (Chap. 7). Arlington, VA: National Science Board.
19.
National Science Foundation. 2000. Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
20.
Raza, G., B. Dutt, and S. Singh. 1997. Kaleidoscoping public understanding of science on hygiene, health and plague: A survey in the aftermath of a plague epidemic in India. Public Understanding of Science6:247-267.
21.
Raza, G., B. Dutt, S. Singh, and A. Wahid. 1991. Prototype of the forms of scientific cognition: A survey of cultural attitude to natural phenomena. Reports I and II. New Delhi: National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies.
22.
Raza, G., S. Singh, and B. Dutt. 1995. Peoples' attitude to scientific knowledge: The context of culture. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research54:108-121.
23.
Raza, G., S. Singh, B. Dutt, and J. Chander. 1996. Confluence of science and people's knowledge at the Sangam. New Delhi: Ishtihaar.
24.
Sardar, Z., and B. V. Loon. 1997. Introducing cultural studies. New York: Totem Books.
25.
Snow, C. P.[1959] 1993. The two cultures. Reprint, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Stamm, K. R., F. Clark, and P. R. Eblacas. 2000. Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: The case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science9:219-237.
Wynne, B.1995. Public understanding of science. In Handbook of science and technology studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. C. Petersen, and T. Pinch, 361-388. London: Sage.
29.
Zhongliang, Z.1991. People and science: Public attitude in China toward science and technology. Science and Public Opinion18:311-317.
