Two recent international conferences held in Sweden focused on science, engineering, and sustainable development. Although both were deemed successful by participants, problems continue with concept definition and with communicating how real steps will be implemented in achieving sustainability's goals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderton, M.
1995. Blue guide: Sweden. London: A&C Black.
2.
Brown, J.
, J. Procter, and N. Roland. 1997. Sweden: The rough guide. London: The Rough Guides.
3.
Einsiedel, E. F.
, and D. L. Eastlick. 2000. Consensus conferences as deliberative democracy: A communications perspective. Science Communication21 (4): 323-343.
4.
Lewis, T. L.2000. Media representations of “sustainable development”: Sustaining the status quo?Science Communication21 (3): 244-273.
5.
Rabe, M.
1994. Living and working in Sweden. Göteborg, Sweden: Tre Bocker Forlag.
6.
Valenti, J. M.1999. Ethical decision making in environmental communication. Journal of Mass Media Ethics13:219-231.
