The diagnosis of cancer is a family affair. Programs of research that evaluate the impact of the cancer diagnosis and treatment on thefamily system can be used to promote more effective physical and psychosocial adjustment of individual family members and the family as a whole. The purpose of this article is to describe an analysis of published empirical studies examining the impact of the cancer diagnosis and treatment of an adult on family functioning. The theoreticalframework, sample, the unit of analysis, measures, and selectedfindings are identified for each study. Feetham's criteriafor research offamilies are applied to evaluate the studies. Implicationsforfuture theory development and research are also presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baider, L.
, & Kaplan De-Nour, A. (1993). Impact of cancer on couples. Cancer Investigation, 11, 706-713.
2.
Bloom, B. L.
(1985). A factor analysis of self report measures of family functioning. Family Process, 24,225-239.
3.
*Carey, P. J.
, Oberst, M. T., McCubbin, M. A., & Hughes, S. (1991). Appraisal and caregiving burden in family members caring for patients receiving chemotherapy. Oncology Nursing Forum, 18,1341-1348.
4.
Clayton, L. A.
, & Byrd, W M. (1993). The African-American cancer crisis. Part I: The problem. Journal of Health Carefor the Poor and Underserved, 4(2), 83-101.
5.
Cook, T. D.
, & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues forfield settings. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
6.
Dashiff, C. J.
(1994). Decision points in choosing family self report scales in research. Image, 26, 283-288.
7.
Feetham, S. L.
(1984). Family research: Issues and directions for nursing. In H. Werley & J. J. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Annual Review of Nursing Research, 2, 3-25.
8.
Feetham, S.
(1991a). Conceptual and methodological issues in research of families. In J. Fawcett & A. Whall (Eds.), Family theory development in nursing: State of the science and art (pp. 55-68). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
9.
Feetham, S. B.
(1991b). Patient outcomes research: Examining the effectiveness of nursing practice. In Proceedings of the State of the Science Conference sponsored by the National CenterfJr Nursing Research. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 93-3411, pp. 103-111). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
10.
Fisher, L.
, Kokes, R F., Ransom, D. C., Phillips, S. L., & Rudd, P. (1985). Alternative strategies for creating "relational" family data. Family Process, 24, 213-224.
11.
Fobair, P. A.
, & Zabora, J. R. (1995). Family functioning as a resource variable in psychosocial cancer research: Issues and measures. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 13,97-114.
12.
*Friedman, L. C.
, Baer, P. E., Nelson, D. V., Lane, M., Smith, F. E., & Dworkin, R J. (1988). Women with breast cancer: Perception of family functioning and adjustment to illness. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50, 529-540.
13.
Ganong, L. H.
(1995). Current trends and issues in family nursing research. Journal of Family Nursing, 1(2), 207-212.
14.
Given, B. A.
, Keilman, L. J., Collins, C., & Given, C. W. (1990). Strategies to minimize attrition in longitudinal studies. Nursing Research, 39, 184-186.
15.
*Hilton, B. A.
(1993). Issues, problems and challenges for families coping with breast cancer. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 9, 88-100.
16.
Kitson, G. C.
, Sussman, M. B., Williams, G. K., Zeehandelaar, R. B., Schickmanter, B. K., & Steinberger, J. C. (1982, November). Sampling issues in family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, pp. 965-981.
17.
Kobasa, S. C.
(1979). Stressful life events, personality and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1-11.
18.
Larson, A.
, & Olson, D. H. (1990). Capturing the complexity of family systems: Integrating family theory, family scores and family analysis. In T. W. Draper & A. C. Marcos (Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualization, measurement and use (pp. 19-47). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Lazarus, R. S.
, & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
20.
Lewis, F.
(1986). The impact of cancer on the family: A critical analysis of the research literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 8, 269-289.
21.
*Lewis, F.
, Hammond, M. A., & Woods, N. F. (1993). The family's functioning with newly diagnosed breast cancer in the mother: The development of an explanatory model. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 351-370.
22.
*Lewis, F.
, Woods, N., Hough, E., & Bensley, L. S. (1989). The family's functioning with chronic illness in the mother: The spouse's perspective. Social Science in Medicine, 29, 1261-1269.
23.
Loveland-Cherry, C. J.
, Youngblut, J. M., & Leidy, N. W. (1989). Apsychometric analysis of the Family Environment Scale. Nursing Research, 38, 262-266.
24.
McCubbin, H. I.
, Larsen, A., & Olson, D. H. (1987). F-COPES: Family Crisis Oriented Personal Scales. In H. I. McCubbin & A. Thompson (Eds.), Family assessment inventoriesfor research and practice (pp. 198-210). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
25.
McCubbin, M. A.
(1993). Family stress theory and the development of nursing knowledge about family adaptation. In S. L. Feetham, S. B. Meister, J. M. Bell, & C. L. Gilliss (Eds.), The nursing offamilies: Theory, research, education, practice (pp. 46-60). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
McCubbin, M. A.
, McCubbin, H. I., & Thompson, A. I. (1987). Family Hardiness Index. In H. I. McCubbin & A. I. Thompson (Eds.), Family assessment inventories for research and practice (pp. 125-132). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
27.
Minuchin, S.
(1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Moos, R. H.
, & Moos, B. S. (1982). Family environment scale manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
29.
Moriarty, H. J.
(1990). Key issues in the family research process: Strategies for nurse researchers. Advances in Nursing Science, 12, 1-14.
30.
Moriarty, H. J.
, & Cotroneo, M. (1993). Sampling issues and family research: Recruitment and sampling issues. In S. L. Feeham, S. B. Meister, J. M. Bell, & C. L. Gilliss (Eds.), The nursing offamilies: Theory, research, education, practice (pp. 79-89). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Munhall, P. L.
(1993a). Language and nursing research. In P. L. Munhall & C. Oiler-Boyd (Eds.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (pp. 5-38). New York: National League for Nursing.
32.
Munhall, P. L.
(1993b). Epistemology in nursing. In P. L. Munhall &C. Oiler-Boyd (Eds.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (pp. 39-65). New York: National League for Nursing.
33.
*Munkres, A.
, Oberst, M. T., & Hughes, S. (1992). Appraisal of illness, symptom distress, self care burden and mood states in patients receiving chemotherapy for initial and recurrent cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 19,1201-1209.
34.
*Musci, E. C.
, & Dodd, M. J. (1990). Predicting self care with patients and family members; Affective states and family functioning. Oncology Nursing Forum, 17, 394-400.
35.
*Northouse, L. L.
, Jeffs, M., Cracchiolo-Caraway, A., Lampman, L., & Dorris, G. (1995). Emotional distress reported by women and husbands prior to a breast biopsy. Nursing Research, 44, 196-201.
36.
*Oberst, M. T.
, Hughes, S., Chang, A. S., & McCubbin, M. A. (1991). Self care burden, stress appraisal, and mood among persons receiving radiotherapy. Cancer Nursing, 14,71-78.
37.
Olson, D. H.
(1991). Commentary: Three-dimensional (3-D) Circumplex Model and revised scoring of FACES LII. Family Process, 30,74-79.
38.
Olson, D. H.
, & Portner, J. (1983). Family adaptability and cohesion scales. In E. E. Filsinger (Ed.), Marriage and family assessment (pp. 299-316). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
Olson, D. H.
, Sprenkle, C. H., & Russell, C. S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types and clinical applications. Family Process, 18, 3-28.
40.
Polit, D. F.
, & Hungler, B. P. (1987). Nursing research: Principles and methods (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
41.
Ryan, E. A.
, & Hayman, L. L. (1996). The role of the family coordinator in longitudinal research: Strategies to recruit and retain families. Journal of Family Nursing, 2(3), 325-335.
42.
Sawin, K. J.
, & Harrigan, M. (1994). Measures of family functioning for research and practice. Scholarly Inquiryfor Nursing Practice, 8, 5-9.
43.
Smilkstein, G.
(1993). Family APGAR analyzed. Family Medicine, 25,293-293.
44.
Smilkstein, G.
, Ashworth, C., & Montano, D. (1982). Validity and reliability of the family APGAR: A test of family function. Journal of Family Practice, 15,303-311.
45.
*Spiegel, D.
, Bloom, J. R., & Gottheil, E. (1983). Family environment as a predictor of adjustment to metastatic breast carcinoma. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 1, 33-44.
46.
*Stetz, K. M.
, Lewis, F., & Houck, G. M. (1994). Family goals as indicants of adaptation during chronic illness. Public Health Nursing, 11, 385-391.
47.
*Vess, J. D.
, Moreland, J. R., & Schwebel, A. J. (1985a). An empirical assessment of the effects of cancer on family role functioning. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 3(1), 1-14.
48.
*Vess, J. D.
, Moreland, J. R., & Schwebel, A. J. (1985b). A follow-up study of role functioning and the psychological environment of families of cancer patients. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 3(2), 1-14.
49.
*Vess, J. D.
, Moreland, J. R., Schwebel, R. I., & Kraut, E. (1988). Psychosocial needs of cancer patients: Learning from patients and their spouses. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 6, 31-51.
50.
Vincent, B.
, & Mirand, A. (1991). The nature of cancer. In S. Baird (Ed.), A cancer sourcebookfor nurses (6th ed., pp. 22-29). Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.
51.
*Woods, N. F.
, Haberman, M. R., & Packard, N. J. (1993). Demands of illness and individual, dyadic and family adaptation in chronic illness. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15,10-30.
52.
*Woods, N. F.
, & Lewis, F. (1995). Women with chronic illness: Their views of their families' adaptation. Health Carefor Women International, 16,135-148.
53.
Woods, N. F.
, & Lewis, F. M. (1992). Design and measurement challenges in family research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 14, 397-403.
